Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction: Ethics, reflexivity and voice

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becker, Howard S. (1986).Writing for Social Scientists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. & Rosenblum, B. (1991).Cancer in two voices. San Francisco: Spinsters Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, H. (1992). “Ethnography and experience: Gender implications in field work and texts.” In J. Okely, & H. Callaway (Eds.),Anthropology and autobiography. (pp. 29–49) New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.) (1986).Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1995). “Ethnicity and Expertise: Racial-ethnic knowledge in sociological research.Gender & Society. 9:612–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1990). “Talking and listening from women's standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis.Social Problems. 37:96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (1990). “Connecting method and epistemology: A white woman interviewing Black women.Women's Studies International Forum. 13:477–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (1995).Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Or, T. (1992). “Do you really know how they make love?: The limits on intimacy with ethnographic informants.”Qualitative Sociology 15: 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. (1967). A comment on disguised observation in sociology.Social Problems, 14, 366–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1992).Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. An Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, F. (1989).Contested lives. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (1982).Good company. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S. (1986).The science question in feminism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1987).Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatch, R. (1988). “The methodological problems of studying a politically resistant community.”Studies in Qualitative Methodology. 1, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiger, S. (1983).The mirror dance: Identity in a women's community. Philadelphia; Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, D. (1990).Crafting selves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, M. (1994). “Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research.” In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 83–97) CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1986). “Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in ethnography.” In Clifford and Marcus (Eds.)Writing Culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. (pp. 234–261) Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992).Feminist methods in social research. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1994). “Writing: A method of inquiry.” In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 516–529) CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (1987). “When gender is not enough: women interviewing women.”Gender & Society. 1:172–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robillard, A. (1994). “Communication Problems in the Intensive Care Unit.”Qualitative Sociology. 17: 383–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1990).Brave new families. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1988).Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.

  • Wasserfall, R. (1993). “Reflexivitiy, feminism and difference.”Qualitative Sociology, 16, 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. and Heikes, E. (1993). “The importance of researcher's gender in the in-depth interview: Evidence from two case studies of male nurses.Gender & Society. 7:280–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zola, I. (1982).Missing pieces: A chronicle of living with a disability. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hertz, R. Introduction: Ethics, reflexivity and voice. Qual Sociol 19, 3–9 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393245

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393245

Keywords

Navigation