Skip to main content
Log in

Institutional competition among jurisdictions: An evolutionary approach

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to outline an evolutionary approach to the process of competition among institutions. We shall focus, in particular, on two issues: first, the role of the competitive process as a knowledge-creating process; and, second, the issue of what inferences, if any, can be drawn from the nature of this process regarding the desirability of its outcomes. In discussing both issues we will draw a parallel between ordinary market competition and competition in the realm of institutions. Some clarifying comments in order to narrow down what we mean by “evolutionary approach” and “institutional competition” precede the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1988) “Following and Leading.” In: Hanusch, H. (ed.)Evolutionary Economics: Applications of Schumpeter's Ideas, 323–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A. (1950) “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.”Journal of Political Economy 58: 211–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P.M. (1990) “Why the Future is not what it was: New Models of Evolution.”Futures 22: 555–70. (Here quoted from typescript, International Ecotechnology Research Centre, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Bedford, England)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P.M., and McGlade, J.M. (1987) “Evolutionary Drive: The Effect of Microscopic Diversity, Error Making, and Noise.”Foundations of Physics 17: 728–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, H. (1952)Schöpferischer Wettbewerb und klassenlose Gesellschaft. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M., and Vanberg, V. (1991) “The Market as a Creative Process.”Economics and Philosophy 7: 167–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. (1965) “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution.” In: Barringer, H.R.; Blanksten, G.I.; and Mack, R.W. (eds.)Social Change in Developing Areas, 19–49. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., et al. (eds.) (1988)Technical Change and Economic Theory. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T.R. (1990)American Federalism—Competition Among Governments. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C.D. (1949)Maintaining Competition. Requisites of a Government Policy. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehl, U. (1986) “Spontaneous Order and the Subjectivity of Expectations: A Contribution to the Lachmann-O'Driscoll Problem.” In: Kirzner, I.M. (ed.)Subjectivism, Intelligibility and the Economic Understanding: Essays in Honor of Ludwig M. Lachmann, 72–86. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. [1980 (1767)]An Essay on the History of Civil Society. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. v. (1948) “The Meaning of Competition.” In: Hayek, F.A. v.Individualism and Economic Order, 92–106. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. v. (1976)Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Vol. 2.The Mirage of Social Justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. v. (1978)New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. v. (1979)Law, Legislation, and Liberty, Vol. 3.The Political Order of a Free People. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. v. (1988)The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, G. (1990) “Evolutorische Ökonomik oder Kreativität in der Theorie.” In: Witt, U. (ed.)Studien zur Evolutorischen Ökonomik I, 49–73. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuss, E. (1965)Allgemeine Markttheorie. Tübingen und Zürich: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) and Polygraphischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppmann, E. (1988)Wirtschaftsordnung und Wettbewerb. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F., and Lloyd, E.A. (1992)Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, W. (1992a) “Innovation, Handlungsrechte und evolutionärer Marktprozess.” In: Witt, U. (ed.)Studien zur Evolutorischen Ökonomik II, 171–95. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, W. (1992b)Competition as a Knowledge-Creating Process. Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Evolutionary Market Processes. Mimeo.

  • Kerber, W. (1993) “Rights, Innovations, and Evolution. The Distributional Effects of Different Rights to Innovate.”Review of Political Economy 5: 427–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, W. (1994) “German Market Process Theory.” In: Boettke, P.J. (ed.)The Edward Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1992)The Meaning of Market Process. Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L.M. (1977)Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process. Essays on the Theory of the Market Economy. Edited by W. Grinder. W. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982)The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, Mass. and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, R. (1992) “Competition: Historical Perspectives.” In: Keller, E.F., and Lloyd, E.A.:Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, 61–67. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J.S. (1989) “Evolution and Economic Change.” In: Silberston, A. (ed.)Technology and Economic Progress. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J.S., and Boden, M. (1992) “Evolutionary Epistemology and the Nature of Technology Strategy.” In: Coombs, R.; Saviotti, P.; and Walsh, V. (eds.)Technological Change and Company Strategies, 49–71. Academic Press.

  • Möschel, W. (1989) “Competition Policy from an Ordo Point of View.” In: Peacock, A., and Willgerodt, H. (eds.)German Neo-liberals and the Social Market Economy, 142–59. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1982)Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1975) “Social Structure and Symbolic Media of Exchange.” In: Blau, P.M. (ed.)Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, 94–120. New York and London.

  • Penrose, E.T. (1952) “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm.”American Economic Review 72: 114–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1972)Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990)The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röpke, J. (1977)Die Strategie der Innovation. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Röpke, J. (1990) “Evolution and Innovation.” In: Dopfer, K., and Raible, K.-F. (eds.)The Evolution of Economic Systems. Essays in Honour of Ota Sik, 111–20. Houndsmill and London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röpke, W. (1960)A Humane Economy. The Social Framework of the Free Market. South Bend, Ind.: Gateway Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934)The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942)Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G.L.S. (1972)Epistemics & Economics. A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, S. (1992) “The Taming of Leviathan: Competition Among Governments.”Constitutional Political Economy 2: 177–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.J. (1987) “How to Model Evolution.” In: Dupre, J. (ed.)The Latest on the Best—Essays on Evolution and Optimality, 117–31. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M.E., and Wegner, G. (1992) “Information, Transactions, and Catallaxy: Reflections on some Key Concepts of Evolutionary Market Theory.” In: Witt, U. (ed.)Explaining Process and Change. Approaches to Evolutionary Economics, 125–49. Ann Arbor: Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C.M. (1956) “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure.”Journal of Political Economy 84: 416–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1983) “Der individualistische Ansatz zu einer Theorie der Entstehung und Entwicklung von Institutionen.”Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie 2: 50–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1991) “Review ofOrdo, Volumes 40 and 41.”Constitutional Political Economy 2: 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1992) “Innovation, Cultural Evolution, and Economic Growth.” In: Witt, U. (ed.)Explaining Process and Change. Approaches to Evolutionary Economics, 105–21. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1993) “Constitutionally Constrained and Safeguarded Competition in Markets and Politics. With Reference to a European Constitution.”Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines 4: 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1994) “Cultural Evolution, Collective Learning and Constitutional Choice.” In: Reisman, D. (ed.)Economic Thought and Political Theory, 171–204. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Translated into German as:Kulturelle Evolution und die Gestaltung von Regeln. Tübingen, Walter Eucken Institut, Vorträge und Aufsätze 144).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V., and Buchanan, J.M. (1991) “Constitutional Choice, Rational Ignorance and the Limits of Reason.”Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie 10: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vihanto, M. (1992) “Competition Between Local Governments as a Discovery Procedure.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 148: 411–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1987a)Individualistische Grundlagen der evolutorischen Ökonomik. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1987b) “How Transaction Rights are Shaped to Channel Innovativeness.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 143: 180–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1991) “Reflections on the Present State of Evolutionary Economic Theory.” In: Hodgson, G., and Screpanti, E. (eds.)Rethinking Economics: Markets, Technology, and Economic Evolution, 83–102. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1992)Evolutionary Economics: An Interpretative Survey. Mimeo, Paper presented at the Eastern Economic Association Meeting, New York.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Richard Wagner for helpful criticism.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanberg, V., Kerber, W. Institutional competition among jurisdictions: An evolutionary approach. Constit Polit Econ 5, 193–219 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393147

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393147

JEL classification

Navigation