Summary
Ten alfalfa cultivars were used to study the effects of nodulation and variations in resistance to alfalfa sickness. The alfalfa seedlings were planted in sick soil with three treatment,,i.e.: pasteurized sick soil inoculated with Rhizobium ‘Nitragin’ which served as the control, the inoculated non-pasteurized sick soil and the non-inoculated non-pasteurized sick soil. None of the alfalfa cultivars were immune from the sickness. Cultivar ‘Anik’ fromMedicago falcata was among the most resistant cultivars. Three Phytophthora root rot resistant cultivars including ‘Agate’, ‘Apollo’ and ‘Ramsey’ were not resistant to the disease. Alfalfa inoculated with Rhizobium showed greatly improved seedling growth. Correlation coefficients showed that those alfalfa cultivars more resistant to alfalfa sickness produced more dry weight. Dry weight increase due to nodulation (82%) had more than compensated for the loss of dry weight due to alfalfa sickness (33%). The present study suggested that the poor growth of alfalfa on sick soil was attributed to both the soil borne pathogens and the poor nodulation of alfalfa, probably due to the absence of effective Rhizobium in sick soil. Highly significant differences were also obtained among olfalfa cultivars for plant dry weight in the inoculation treatment. Selection for effective Rhizobium strains and for alfalfa genotypes which are resistant to alfalfa sickness and are high in nitrogen fixation rates could improve alfalfa yield in sick soil.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Damirgi S M, Cook F D and Webster G R 1976 Alfalfa disease in some Alberta soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 56, 97–103.
Domirgi S M, Cook F D and Webster G R 1978 Incidence of root rot fungus in a diseased alfalfa soil of central Alberta. Can. J. Soil Sci. 58, 229–236.
Drapeau R, Fortin J A and Gagnon C 1973 Antifungal activity of Rhizobium. Can. J. Bot. 51, 681–682.
Duhigg P, Melton B and Baltensperger A 1978 Selection for acetylene reduction rate in ‘Mesilla’ alfalfa. Crop Sci. 18, 813–816.
Faechner T R and Bolton J L 1978 Chemical control of alfalfa sickness. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58, 891–892.
Faechner T R and Bolton J L 1978 Genetics of resistance and susceptibility in alfalfa to alfalfa sick soil. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58, 945–952.
Golpen B P and Webster G R 1969 Selection inMedicago sativa for tolerance to alfalfa sick soils of Central Alberta. Agron. J. 61, 589–591.
McElgunn J D and Heinrichs D H 1970 Effects of root temperature and a suspected phytotoxic substance on the growth of alfalfa. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50, 307–311.
Murphy W M, Barber L E and Hagedorn C 1977 Inoculant effects on nodulation of alfalfa seedlings grown on alfalfa-sick soil. Agron. Abstr. 103.
Roslycky E B 1967 Bacteriocin production in the Rhizobia bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 13, 431.
Seetin M W and Barnes D K 1977 Variation among alfalfa genotypes for rate of acetylene reduction. Crop Sci. 17, 783–787.
Steel R G D and Torrie T H 1960 Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., N.Y.
Tan G Y 1981 Genetic variation for acetylene reduction rate and other characters in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 485–488.
Tan G Y and Tan W K 1981 Net assimilation rate and relative nitrogen assimilation rate in relation to the dry matter production of alfalfa cultivars. Plant and Soil 59, 185–192.
Tan G Y and Tan W K 1984 Interaction between alfalfa cultivars and Rhizobium strains for nitrogen fixation. Theor. Appl. Genet. (In press).
Tu J C 1978 Protection of soybean from severe Phytophthora root rot by Rhizobium. Physiol. Plant Pathology. 12, 233–240.
Webster G R and Dekok P C 1969 Nutrient status of alfalfa showing poor growth on some Alberta soils. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50, 277–282.
Webster G R, Khan S U and Moore A W 1967 Poor growth of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) on some Alberta soils. Agron. J. 59, 37–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, GY., Tan, WK. Effects of nodulation on resistance to alfalfa sickness among ten alfalfa cultivars. Plant Soil 94, 133–141 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380595
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380595