Summary
The hydraulic resistivity ofVicia faba L. roots grown in soil was estimated from steady state measurements of transpiration rate and leaf and soil water potentials. Root and stem axial resistivities, estimated from xylem vessel radii, were negligible. Root radial resistivity was estimated to be 1.3×1012 sm−1.
This root radial resistivity value was used to estimate, root resistance to water uptake for a field crop ofVicia faba. Previously published results were used for root distribution and soil water contents at the drained upper limit (DUL) and the lower limit (LL) of extractable soil water. Soil resistance to water uptake was estimated from single root theory using the steady rate solution.
At the DUL, root resistance was about 105 times greater than soil resistance. At the LL, soil resistance exceeded root resistance for depths less than 0.3 m, but for depths greater than this soil resistance was smaller than root resistance. Estimates of possible uptake rates at given leaf water potentials indicated that overall soil resistance had a negligible influence upon uptake, even at the LL. The reliability of this result is examined in detail.
It is concluded that over the complete range of extractable soil water contents soil resistanceper se would not have limited water use by this crop. This conclusion may also be valid for a wide range of soil and crop combinations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brouwer R 1953 Water absorption by the roots ofVicia faba at various transpiration strengths: II. Causal relation between suction tension, resistance and uptake. Proc. Kon. Acad. Wet. C 56, 129–136.
Burch G J 1979 Soil and plant resistances to water absorption by plant root systems. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 30, 279–292.
Caldwell M M 1976 Root extension and water absorption.In Water and Plant Life. Eds O L Lange, L Kappen and E D Schulze. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp 63–85.
Cowan I R 1965 Transport of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. J. Appl. Ecol. 2, 221–239.
Faiz S M A and Weatherly P E 1982 Root contraction in transpiring plants. New Phytol. 92, 333–343.
Gardner W R 1960 Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants. Soil Sci. 89, 63–73.
Graham J, Clarkson D T and Sanderson J 1974 Physiology of root function. A.R.C. Letcombe Laboratory Annual Report for 1973, 9–12.
Greacen E L, Ponsana P and Barley K P 1976 Resistance to water flow in the roots of cereals.In Water and Plant Life. Eds. O L Lange, L Kappen and E D Schulze. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp 86–100.
Hanks R J 1965 Estimating infiltration from soil moisture properties. J. Soil Water Conserv. 20, 49–51.
Herkelrath W N, Miller E E and Gardner W R 1977 Water uptake by plants: II. The root contact model. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 41, 1039–1043.
Hillel D, Krentos V D and Sylianov Y 1972 Procedure and test of an internal drainage method for measuring soil hydraulic characteristicsin situ. Soil Sci. 114, 395–400.
Hulugalle N R and Willat S T 1983 The role of soil resistance in determining water uptake by plant root systems. Aust. J. Soil Res. 21, 571–574.
Jackson R D 1972 On the calculation of hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 380–383.
Johns G G 1982 Measurement and simulation of evaporation from a red earth: II Simulation using different evaporation functions. Aust. J. Soil Res. 20, 179–191.
Johns G G and Smith R C F 1975 Accuracy of soil water budgets based on a range of relationships for the influence of soil water availability on actual water use. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 26, 871–873.
Newman E I 1969 Resistance to water flow in soil and plant. I. Soil resistance in relation to amounts of root: theoretical estimates J. Appl. Ecol. 6, 1–12.
Newman E I 1971 Permeability to water of the roots of five herbaceous species. New Phytol. 72, 547–555.
Newman E I 1974 Root and soil water relations.In The Plant Root and its Environment. Ed. E W Carson. University Press of Virginia. Carlottesville. pp 363–440.
Passioura J B 1984 Hydraulic resistance of plants. I. Constant or variable? Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11, 333–339.
Reicosky D C and Ritchie J T 1976 Relative importance of soil resistance and plant resistance in root water absorption. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 40, 293–297.
Reid J B, Hashim O and Gallagher J N 1984 Relations between available and extractable soil water and evapotranspiration from a bean crop. Agric. Water Manage. 9, 193–209.
Rijtema P E 1967 Measurement of the capillary conductivity of undisturbed soil samples under steady state conditions of flow according to the method of RIJTEMA.In West European Methods for Soil Structure Determination Ed. by M De Boodt, L De Leenheer, H Frese, A J Low and P K Peerlkamp State Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Ghent, Belgium, pp V129-V131.
Ritchie J T 1981 Water dynamics in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Plant and Soil 58, 81–96.
Ritchie J T, Burnett E and Henderson R C 1972 Dryland evaporative flux in a subhumid climate. III. Soil water influence. Agron. J. 64, 168–174.
Rowse H R and Goodman D 1981 Axial resistance to water movement in broad bean (Vicia faba) roots. J. Exp. Bot. 32, 591–598.
Scholander P F, Hammel H T, Bradstreet E D and Hemmingsen E A 1965 Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148, 339–346.
Tenant D 1975 A test of a modified line intercept method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63, 995–1001.
Tinker P B 1976 Roots and water. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 445–461.
Zur B, Jones J W, Boote K J and Hammond L C 1982 Total resistance to water flow in field soybeans: II. Limiting soil moisture. Agron. J. 74, 99–105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reid, J.B., Hutchison, B. Soil and plant resistances to water uptake byVicia faba L.. Plant Soil 92, 431–441 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372491
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372491