Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in primary science over the past decade: Implications for the research community

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

During the early 1980s in Australia there was a new wave of expectancy about primary science as new curricula were being considered or introduced and research findings were beginning to identify new directions for both teaching and research. In an expression of this, six authors were invited to present papers to a symposium on primary science held in 1984 to address the question: “What do you believe should be the state of primary science (in Australia) in 1995 and what are the steps which need to be taken to achieve the desired state?” This study set out to identify what had been said at that time, to compare that with actual developments, and to identify possible future directions for research. Relevant publications includingResearch in Science Education were analysed as a means of comparing what had happened since 1984 with the hopes of those authors. It was only in the latter half of the decade that some of the scenarios painted by the authors in 1984 began to emerge. A key implication for the research community drawn from the analysis shows that science education researchers have tended to neglect working in collaboration with education departments and authorities for the improvement of primary science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleton, K. (1977). Is there a fairy godmother in the house?Australian Science Teachers Journal, 23(3), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (1984a, December).Beyond the Primary Science Project. Paper presented at the Science Advisory Teachers' conference, Brisbane, Queensland.

  • Appleton, K. (1984b). Educating teachers: A new message? In D. Symington (Ed.),Primary science: The next ten years. Malvern, Vic: Victoria College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (1984c). Student teachers' opinions—a follow up.Research in Science Education, 14, 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (1989). A learning model for science education.Research in Science Education, 19, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (1990). A learning model for science education: Developing teaching strategies.Research in Science Education, 20, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (1991). Mature age students, how are they different?Research in Science Education, 21, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science: Self perceptions of primary teacher education students.Research in Science Education, 22, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (1996, January).Preservice science teacher education and learning theory: A report on practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS), Seattle, USA.

  • Appleton, K., & Beasley, W. (1994). Students' learning in science lessons: Towards understanding the learning process.Research in Science Education, 24, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K., Hawe, E., Biddulph, F., & Osborne, R. (1984). So you think the guide materials look good!Research in Science Education, 14, 206–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K., Skamp, K., Crawford, G., Cousins, J., Kirkwood, V., Jones, B., Palmer, W., Tytler, R., & Fleer, M. (1995, July).An Australian curriculum in science? Responses by the States to the Statements and Profiles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Bendigo, Victoria.

  • Australian Academy of Science [AcoS]. (1994).Primary Investigations. Canberra, ACT: Australian Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. (1994). Teaching Science in primary schools: What knowledge do teachers need?Research in Science Education, 24, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearlin, M. (1990). Toward a gender-sensitive model of science teacher education for women primary and early childhood teachers.Research in Science Education, 20, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. (Ed.). (1993).I know about LISP but how do I put it into practice? Final Report of the Learning in Science Project (Teacher Development). Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1993). Towards a model of teacher development. In B. Bell (Ed.),I know about LISP but how do I put it into practice? Final Report of the Learning in Science Project (Teacher Development)(pp. 365–381). Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., & Pearson, J. (1991). I know about LISP but how do I put it into practice?Research in Science Education, 21, 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. F., Kirkwood, V. M., & Pearson, J. D. (1990). Learning in Science Project (Teacher Development): The framework.Research in Science Education, 20, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. (1984). Primary science in Australia and South Australia in 1995. In D. Symington (Ed.),Primary science: The next ten years. Malvern, Vic: Victoria College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, F., & Osborne, R. (1984a). Pupils' ideas about floating and sinking.Research in Science Education, 14, 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, F., & Osborne, R. (1984b).Making sense of our world: An interactive teaching approach. Hamilton, N.Z.: SERU, University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, F., Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1983). Investigating learning in science at the primary school level.Research in Science Education, 13, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M., & Symington, D. (1991). The treatment of discipline knowledge in primary teacher education.Research in Science Education, 21, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, B. (1992). Classroom behaviour settings for science: What can pre-service teachers achieve?Research in Science Education, 22, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Corporation. (1994a).A statement on science for Australian schools. Carlton, Vic: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Corporation. (1994b).Science—A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Carlton, Vic: Curriculum Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, K. (1982). Attitudes to inquiry teaching in students preparing to be primary school teachers.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 28(3), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment, Education and Training [DEET]. (1989).Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, T. S., & Ritchie G. (1992). Reconstructing the interactive science pedagogy: Experiences of beginning teachers implementing the interactive science pedagogy.Research in Science Education, 22, 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, F. N. (1983). Science processes.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M., Hardy, T., Baron, K., & Malcolm, C. (1995).They don't tell the truth about the wind: K-3 science program. Carlton, Vic: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, M. N., Healy, T. W., & Spurling, T. H. (1984). Primary science-some chemists' views. In D. Symington (Ed.),Primary science: The next ten years. Malvern, Vic: Victoria College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., Cousins, J., & Kinnear, A. (1992). The reluctant primary school teacher.Research in Science Education, 22, 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, M. (1994). Student beliefs and learning environments: Developing a survey of factors related to conceptual change.Research in Science Education, 24, 156–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happs, J. C. (1991). Challenging pseudo-scientific and paranormal beliefs held by some pre-service primary teachers.Research in Science Education, 21, 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, T., Bearlin, M., & Kirkwood, V. (1990). Outcomes of the Primary and Early Childhood Science and Technology Education Project at the University of Canberra.Research in Science Education, 20, 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, T., & Kirkwood, V. (1991a, July).Challenging and developing teachers' conception of science education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Gold Coast, Queensland.

  • Hardy, T., & Kirkwood, V. (1991b, July).Toward creating effective learning environments for science teachers: The role of the science educator in the tertiary setting. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Gold Coast, Queensland.

  • Hayes, D., & Symington, D. (1989). Techniques used by primary school pupils in drawing during science activities.Research in Science Education, 19, 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, G. (1992). Improving the quality of primary science teaching through a pre-service course.Research in Science Education, 22, 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. A. (1977). Victorian primary science: Five years on.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 23(1), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G. (1991). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods to monitor an intervention programme.Research in Science Education, 21, 178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane, B., Martin, M. D., & Tytler, R. (1991). Changing primary teacher trainees' attitudes to science.Research in Science Education, 21, 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeans, B., & Farnsworth, I. (1992). Primary science education: Views from three Australian states.Research in Science Education, 22, 214–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrison, A. R., & Jones, B. L. (1994). Responses to an interactive science exhibit in a school setting.Research in Science Education, 24, 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, V., Bearlin, M., & Hardy, T. (1989). New approaches to the inservice education in science and technology of primary and early childhood teachers (Or Mum is not dumb after all).Research in Science Education, 19, 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W., & Wallace, J. (1990). The constructivist paradox: Teachers' knowledge and constructivist science teaching.Research in Science Education, 20, 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. B., & Dooley, J. H. (1982). Student teachers' attitude towards science and science teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(9), 805–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, C. (1984). Primary science in the 1990s. In D. Symington (Ed.),Primary science: The next ten years. Malvern, Vic: Victoria College.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, D., & McInerney, V. (1994).Educational psychology: Constructing learning. Sydney, NSW: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (1994). Knowing and learning about science in a pre-service setting: A narrative study.Research in Science Education, 24, 236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napper, I., & Crawford, G. (1990). Focus folklore: Reflections of focus teachers on the Sci-Tech Inservice Project.Research in Science Education, 20, 230–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. (1984). A focus on children's ideas. In D. Symington (Ed.),Primary science: The next ten years. Malvern, Vic: Victoria College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K. (1994). Factors perceived to have enabled twenty-five women to develop expertise to teach primary science.Research in Science Education, 24, 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., & Treagust, D. (1992). Primary pre-service teachers' pedagogical reasoning skills.Research in Science Education, 22, 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. W. (1989). Inservice for elementary teachers in science education—Some directions for the future.Research in Science Education, 19, 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G., & Cosgrove, M. (1992). Challenging student teachers' conceptions of science and technology education.Research in Science Education, 22, 348–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G., & Cosgrove, M. (1993). “The sun is sleeping now”: Early learning about light and shadows.Research in Science Education, 23, 276–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K. (1989). General science knowledge and attitudes towards science and science teaching of pre-service primary teachers: Implications for pre-service units.Research in Science Education, 19, 257–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K. (1991). Primary science and technology: How confident are the teachers?Research in Science Education, 21, 290–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K. (1992). Attitudes of pre-service mature age women students towards teaching primary science: An interview study.Research in Science Education, 22, 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington, D. (1974). Why so little primary science?Australian Science Teachers Journal, 20(1), 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington, D. (1984a). Restricting the menu. In D. Symington (Ed.),Primary science: The next ten years. Malvern, Vic: Victoria College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington, D. (Ed.). (1984b).Primary science: The next ten years. Malvern, Vic: Victoria College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington, D., & Hayes, D. (1987). Parental involvement in a science program.Research in Science Education, 17, 228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington, D., & Hayes, D. (1989). What do you need to know to teach science in the primary school?Research in Science Education, 19, 278–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (1992). Children's explanations of air pressure generated by small group activities.Research in Science Education, 22, 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (1994). Consistency of children's use of science conceptions: Problems with the notion of “conceptual change.”Research in Science Education, 24, 338–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley, P. (1975).Science in the primary school. Brisbane, Qld: Research Branch, Department of Education, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, S., & Goodrum, D. (1990). How confident are primary schools teachers in teaching science?Research in Science Education, 20, 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Central Queensland University, 4702, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia

    Ken Appleton

  2. Deakin University, USA

    David Symington

Authors
  1. Ken Appleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Symington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Appleton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Appleton, K., Symington, D. Changes in primary science over the past decade: Implications for the research community. Research in Science Education 26, 299–316 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356941

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356941

Keywords

Search

Navigation