Skip to main content
Log in

Psychological reactance and its relationship to normal personality variables

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the dimensions of normal personality style associated with psychological reactance. Participants consisted of 326 graduate and undergraduate students. They took the California Psychological Inventory—Revised, the Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS), and the Fragebogen zur Messung der psychologischen Reactanz (Questionnaire for the Measurement of Psychological Reactance). Results showed that the reactant individual has a personality style characterized by having a lack of interest in making a good impression on others, being somewhat careless about meeting obligations, being less tolerant of other's beliefs, resisting rules and regulations, being more concerned about problems and worried about the future, and being more inclined to express strong feelings and emotions. Separate analyses by sex on the TRS suggested that reactant women had a personality style that was more decisive, more sociable, and more self-assured than nonreactant women. Conversely, reactant individuals tended to be more concerned with problems and the future than did nonreactant individuals, although this difference did not appear for the subsample of women only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beutler, L. E. (1979). Toward specific psychological therapies for specific conditions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 882–897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966).A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981).Psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W., & Lohnes, P. (1971).Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courchaine, K. E. (1993).The role of client reactance on counselor social influence and the therapeutic alliance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.

  • Dowd, E. T., Hughes, S., Brockbank, L., Halpain, D., Seibel, C. & Seibel, P. (1988). Compliance-based and defiance-based intervention strategies and psychological reactance in the treatment of free and unfree behavior.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, E. T., Milne, C. R., & Wise, S. L. (1991). The Therapeutic Reactance Scale: A measure of psychological reactance.Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 541–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, E. T., & Wallbrown, F. (1993). Motivational components of client reactance.Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 533–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S. L. (1978). Research on client variables in psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 191–232). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1987).California Psychological Inventory administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybar, S. R., Antonnucio, D. O., Boutilier, L. R. & Varble, D. L. (1989). Psychological reactance as a factor affecting patient compliance to physician advice.Scandinavian Journal of Behavior Therapy, 18, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. O., & Goheen, M. D. (1990). Factors mediating the success of defiance- and compliance-based interventions.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1984)Personality Research Form manual (3rd ed.), Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, D. L., & Lichstein, K. L. (1980). The resistive client: A neglected phenomenon in behavior therapy.Behavior Modification, 4, 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (1991). Introduction to psychotherapy research. In L. E. Beutler & M. Crago (Eds.),Psychotherapy research: An international review of programmatic studies (pp. 7–8). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucka, P. A. (1991). Client reactance and counselor interpretations: Do they make a difference? (Doctoral Dissertation, Kent State University, 1990).Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-01B, 522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, K. F. (1992).A scale for assessing psychological reactance proneness: Reliability and validity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska—Lincoln.

  • McKay, J. K., Dowd, E. T., & Rollin, S. A. (1982). Clients' characteristics as mediating variables in perception of counselors' social influence.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 523–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, J. (1983). Fragebogen zur Messung der psychologischen Reactanz [Questionnaire for the measurement of psychological reactance].Diagnostica, Band XXIX 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. (1982).Multivariate regression in behavioral, research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh, M., Tennen, H., Press, S., & White, L. (1981). Compliance, defiance, and therapeutic paradox.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 454–467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham-Salomon, V., Avner, R., & Neeman, R. (1989). You're changed if you do and changed if you don't: Mechanisms underlying paradoxical interventions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 590–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swoboda, J. S., Dowd, E. T., & Wise, S. L. (1990). Reframing and restraining directives in the treatment of clinical depression.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. (1978).Correlational procedures for research. New York: Gardner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, T. J., Ellickson, T. L., & Sherry, P. (1989). Reactance in relation to difference supervisory environments and counselor development.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallbrown F. H., & Jones, J. A. (1992). Reevaluating the factor structure of the revised California Psychological Inventory.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to thank Dana Fisher Trau and Earle Donelson for experimental assistance. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 1993 convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto. The fourth author is deceased.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas Dowd, E., Wallbrown, F., Sanders, D. et al. Psychological reactance and its relationship to normal personality variables. Cogn Ther Res 18, 601–612 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02355671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02355671

Key words

Navigation