Skip to main content
Log in

Development and assessment of a single-image fringe projection method for dynamic applications

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A single-image fringe projection profiling method suitable for dynamic applications was developed by combining an accurate camera calibration procedure and improved phase extraction procedures. The improved phase extraction process used a modified Hilbert transform with Laplacian pyramid algorithms to improve measurement accuracy. The camera calibration method used an accurate pinhole camera model and pixel-by-pixel calibration of the phase-height relationship. Numerical simulations and controlled baseline experiments were performed to quantify key error sources in the measurement process and verify the accuracy of the approach. Results from numerical simulations indicate that the resulting phase error can be reduced to less than 0.02 radians provided that parameters such as fringe spacing, random measured intensity noise, fringe contrast and frequency of spatial intensity noise are carefully controlled. Experimental results show that the effects of random temporal and spatial noise in typical CCD cameras for single fringe images limits the accuracy of the method to 0.04 radians in most applications. Quantitative results from application of the fringe projection method are in very good agreement with numerical predictions, demonstrating that it is possible to design both a fringe projection system and a measurement process to achieve a prespecified accuracy and resolution in the point-to-point measurement of the spatial (X, Y, Z) positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McNeill, S.R., Sutton, M.A., Miao, Z., andMa, J., “Measurement of Surface Profile Using Digital Image Correlation,”Experimental Mechanics,37 (1),13–21 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Helm, J.D., Sutton, M.A. andMcNeill, S.R., “Improved Three-dimensional Image Correlation for Surface Displacement Measurement,”Opt. Eng.,35,1911–1920 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsai, R.Y., “An Efficient and Accurate Camera Calibration Technique for 3D Machine Vision,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 364–374 (1986).

  4. Weng J., Cohen, P., Herniou, M., “Camera Calibration with Distortion Models and Accuracy Evaluation,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.,14,965–980 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Takasaki, M., “Moiré Topography,”Appl. Opt.,9,1467–1472 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Masanoril, I., Toyohiko, Y., andTakashi, S., “Scanning Moiré Method and Automatic Measurement of 3-D Shapes,”Appl. Opt.,6,2152–2162 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Matssumoto, T., Kitagawa, Y., Adachi, M., andHayashi, A., “Moiré Topography for Three-dimensional Profile Measurement Using the Interference Fringes,”Opt. Eng.,31,2668–2672 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suganuma, M. andYoshizawa, T., “Three-dimensional Shape Analysis by Use of a Projected Grating Image,”Opt. Eng.,30,1529–1533 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Larkin, K.G. andOreb, B.F., “Design and Assessment of Symmetrical Phase-shifting Algorithms,”J. Opt. Soc. Am.,9,1741–1748 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hibino, K., Oreb, B.F., andFarrant, D.I., “Phase Shifting for Nonsinusoidal Waveforms with Phase-shifting Errors,”J. Opt. Soc. Am.,12,761–768 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, B. andSurrel, Y., “Effects of Quantization Error on the Computed Phase of Phase-shifting Measurements,”Appl. Opt.,36,2070–2075 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hibino, K., Oreb, B.F., Farrant, D., andLarkin, K.G., “Phaseshifting Algorithms for Nonlinear and Spatially Nonuniform Phase Shifts,”J. Opt. Soc. Am.,14,918–930 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hibino, K., Larkin, K.G., Oreb, B.F., andFarrant, D.I., “Phaseshifting Algorithms for Nonlinear and Spatially Nonuniform Phase Shifts: Reply to Comment,”J. Opt. Soc. Am.,15,1234–1235 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, P.S., Jin, F., and Chiang, F.P., “Quantitative NDE of Corrosion by Digital Fringe Projection and Phase Shifting,” Proceedings of the SEM Spring Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Houston, TX, 305–306 (June 1998).

  15. Huntley, J.M. and Coggrave, C.R., “High Speed Measurement of Discontinoous Surface Profiles,” International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Symposium on Advanced Optical Methods and Applications in Solid Mechanics, Poitiers-Futuroscope, France, 161–168 (Aug.–Sep. 1988).

  16. Hornbeck, L.J., “Digital Light Processing for High-brightness, High-resolution Applications,”Proc. SPIE,3013,27–40 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kato, J., Yamaguchi, I., Nakamura, T., andKuwashima, S., “Videorate Fringe Analyzer Based on Phase-shifting Electronic Moiré Patterns,”Appl. Opt.,36,8403–8412 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Takeda, M., Ika, H., andKobayasha, S., “Fourier Transform Method of Fringe Pattern Analysis for Computer Based Topography and Interferometry,”J. Opt. Soc. Am.,72,156–160 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zweig, D.A., Hufnagel, R.E., “A Hilbert Transform Algorithm for Fringe-pattern Analysis,”Adv. Opt. Manufact. Test.,SPIE 1333,295–302 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jaehne, B., Practical Handbook on Image Processing for Scientific Applications, Chemical Rubber Company Press, Cleveland, OH (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tang, S. andHung, Y.Y., “Fast Profilometer for the Automatic Measurement of 3-D Object Shapes,”Appl. Opt.,29,3012–3018 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toyooka, S. andIwasa, Y., “Automatic Profilometry of 3-D Diffuse Objects by Spatial Phase Detection,”Appl. Opt.,25,1630–1633 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gu, R., Yoshizawa, T., andOtani, Y., “One-step Phase Shift 3-D Surface Profilometry with Grating Projection,”Appl. Opt.,21 (1–2),61–75 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Burt, P.J. andAdelson, E.H., “The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code,”IEEE Trans. Commun.,31,532–540 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huntley, J.M., “Noise-immune Phase Unwrapping Algorithm,”Appl. Opt.,28,3268–3270 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bone, D.J., “Fourier Fringe Analysis—The 2-dimensional Phase Unwrapping Problem,”Appl. Opt.,30,3627–3632 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Carter, W.H., “On Unwrapping 2-dimensional Phase Data in Contour Maps,”Opt. Commun.,94 (1–3),1–7 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Judge, T.R. andBryanstoncross, P.J., “A Review of Phase Unwrapping Techniques in Fringe Analysis,”Opt. Lasers Eng.,21,199–239 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cusack, R., Huntley, J.M., andGoldrein, H.T., “Improved Noiseimmune Phase-unwrapping Algorithm,”Appl. Opt.,34,781–789 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huntley, J.M. andSaldner, H.O., “Shape Measurement Temporal Phase Unwrapping: Comparison of Unwrapping Algorithms,”Maes. Sci. Tech.,8,986–992 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fujigaki, M. and Morimoto, Y., “Automated Shape Analysis for Multiple Phase Fringes by Phase-shifting Method Using Fourier Transform,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics,1,Oxford, UK, 711–715 (Aug. 1998).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutton, M.A., Zhao, W., McNeill, S.R. et al. Development and assessment of a single-image fringe projection method for dynamic applications. Experimental Mechanics 41, 205–217 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323136

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323136

Key Words

Navigation