Abstract
In the Maastricht Treaty and the European Stability and Growth Pact, it was recognized that high public deficits and debt levels would endanger the success of the European Economic and Monetary Union. In its stability program, updated in December 2001, the German government published its objective to achieve a balanced general budget in the year 2004. The budget of the central government should be balanced in 2006 [Bundesfinanzministerium, 2001]. This paper analyzes the effects of strict budget consolidation policies on important macroeconomic variables like inflation, unemployment and GDP growth. It is shown that a balanced budget as early as 2004 would necessitate high public consumption and investment. These should be financed by higher indirect taxes, whereas social security contribution rates should be reduced to bring unemployment down.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Federal Republic of Germany, Federal Ministry of Finance (Bundesfinanzministerium).German Stability Programme, December 2001 Update, Berlin, December 2001.
Carlberg, Michael.Economic Policy in a Monetary Union, Berlin et al.: Springer, 2000.
Clements, Mike; Hendry, David. “Macro-Economic Forecasting and Modelling,”The Economic Journal, 105, 1995, pp. 1001–13.
Deutsche Bundesbank. “Stellungnahme des Zentralsbankrates zur Konvergenzlage in der Europäischen Union im Hinblick auf die dritte Stufe der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion,”Monthly Bulletin, April 1998, pp. 17–40.
Dreger, Christian; Brautsch, Hans-Ulrich. “Dokumentation. Das Makrooekonomische Modell des IWH - Version 1.0,” IWH Discussion Paper 55, 1997.
Karbuz, Sohbet; Matulka, Josef; Neck, Reinhard. “OPTCON: An Algorithm for the Optimal Control of Nonlinear Stochastic Models. User Manual.” Discussion Paper 284, Department of Economics, University of Bielefeld, 1994.
Lucas, Robert E., Jr. “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique,” in: Karl Brunner, Alan Meltzer, eds.,The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, Amsterdem, 1976, pp. 19–46.
Matulka, Josef; Neck, Reinhard. “OPTCON: An Algorithm for the Optimal Control of Nonlinear Stochastic Models,”Annals of Operations Research, 37, 1992, pp. 375–401.
Neck, Reinhard; Karbuz, Sohbet. “Optimal Budgetary and Monetary Policies under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Control Approach,”Annals of Operations Research, 58, 1995, pp. 379–402.
——. “Optimal Control of Fiscal Policies for Austria: Applications of a Stochastic Control Algorithm,”Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods & Applications, 30, 1997, pp. 1051–61.
——. “Optimal Macroeconomic Policies with and without the Monetary Instrument,” in: Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger et al., eds.,Modelling and Decisions in Economics. Essays in Honor of Franz Ferschl, Heidelberg et al.: Physica, 1999, pp. 255–68.
Sutter, Matthias.Der Stabilitäts- und Wachstumspakt in der Europäischen Währungsunion. Grundlagen, Abstimmungsmacht und Glaubwürdigkeit der Sanktionierung übermäßiger Defizite, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999.
Tüselmann, Heinz Josef. “Economic Developments in Germany and Their Impact on Europe,” in: Frank McDonald; Stephen Dearden, eds.,European Economic Integration, Second edition, London: Longman, 1994, pp. 323–43.
Welfens, Paul J. J. “Transatlantic Growth Differentials, ICT Dynamics, Fiscal Policy and the Fall of the Euro,” Discussion Paper 82, University of Potsdam, European Economy and International Economic Relations, 2001.
Weyerstrass, Klaus; Neck, Reinhard. “Towards an Objective Function for Slovenian Fiscal Policy-Making: A Heuristic Approach,” in: Andranin Tangian; Josef Gruber, eds.,Constructing and Applying Objective Functions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 510, Berlin et al.: Springer, 2001, pp. 366–89.
Weyerstrass, Klaus; Neck, Reinhard; Haber, Gottfried. “Optimal Monetary and Fiscal Policies for Slovenia Under Flexible and Fixed Exchange Rates,”Central European Journal of Operations Research, 8, 3, 2000, pp. 209–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weyerstrass, K. The german stability program: A quantitative assessment. Atlantic Economic Journal 30, 320–334 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298428
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298428