Abstract
A linear utility model is introduced for optimal selection when several subpopulations of applicants are to be distinguished. Using this model, procedures are described for obtaining optimal cutting scores in subpopulations in quota-free as well as quota-restricted selection situations. The cutting scores are optimal in the sense that they maximize the overall expected utility of the selection process. The procedures are demonstrated with empirical data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference note
van der Flier, H., & Drenth, P. J. D.Fair selection and comparability of test scores. Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Educational Testing, Leiden, The Netherlands, June 1977.
References
Bock, R. D.Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
Clearly, T. A. Test Bias: Prediction of grades of negro and white students in integrated colleges.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968,5, 115–124.
Cole, N. S. Bias in selection.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973,10, 237–255.
Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C.Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1965.
Darlington, R. B. Another look at “culture fairness”.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971,8, 71–82.
Einhorn, H. J., & Bass, A. R. Methodological considerations relevant to discrimination in employment testing.Psychological Bulletin, 1971,75, 261–269.
Ferguson, T. S.Mathematical statistics: A decision theoretic approach. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Gross, A. L., & Su, W. H. Defining a “fair” or “unbiased” selection model: A question of utilities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975,60, 345–351.
Linn, R. L. Fair test use in selection.Review of Educational Research, 1973,43, 139–161.
Novick, M. R., & Lindley, D. V. The use of more realistic utility functions in educational applications.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1978,15, 181–191.
Petersen, N. S. An expected utility model for “optimal” selection.Journal of Educational Statistics, 1976,1, 333–358.
Petersen, N. S., & Novick, M. R. An evaluation of some models for culture-fair selection.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1976,13, 3–29.
Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R.Applied statistical decision theory. Boston: Harvard University, 1961.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., McKenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T. W. Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979,64, 609–626.
Thorndike, R. L. Concepts of culture-fairness.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971,8, 63–70.
van der Linden, W. J., & Mellenbergh, G. J. Optimal cutting scores using a linear loss function.Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977,1, 593–599.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The order of the names of the authors is alphabetical; they are equally responsible for the content. We thank Fred N. Kerlinger for his comments, Henk van der Flier for making available his data, and Ineke Wesling and Erna Bot for typing the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mellenbergh, G.J., van der Linden, W.J. The linear utility model for optimal selection. Psychometrika 46, 283–293 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293736
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293736