Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T11:06:09.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Parallel Proportional Profiles” and other Principles for Determining the Choice of Factors by Rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Raymond B. Cattell
Raymond B. Cattell*
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The choosing of a set of factors likely to correspond to the real psychological unitary traits in a situation usually reduces to finding a satisfactory rotation in a Thurstone centroid analysis. Seven principles, three of which are new, are described whereby rotation may be determined and/or judged. It is argued that the most fundamental is the principle of “parallel proportional profiles” or “simultaneous simple structure.” A mathematical proof of the uniqueness of determination by this means is attempted and equations are suggested for discovering the unique position.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1944 , pp. 267 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © 1944 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Reyburn and Taylor (13) and others have sometimes spoken of an intermediate degree of reality. “If common factors are not causal they must at least be objective . . . [which requires] a certain form and degree of invariance” [namely, of factor loading of a test from battery to battery]. We should consider such factors to be in a transitory limbo, destined soon to emerge to one status or the other.

References

Burt, C. The factors of the mind, London: University of London Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. Temperament tests: I. Temperament. Brit. J. Psychol., 1932, 23, 308–329.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. The description of personality: I. Foundations of trait measurement. Psychol. Rev., 1943, 50, 559–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. The description of personality: II. Basic traits resolved into clusters. J. abn. & soc. Psychol., 1943, 38, 476–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
--. The description of personality: III. Principles and findings in a factor analysis of the personality sphere. (Publication to be announced).Google Scholar
--. The cultural functions of social stratification: I. Regarding the genetic bases of society. J. soc. Psychol., 1944, 20.Google Scholar
--. The operational determination of trait unities and modalities. Brit. J. Psychol., (Publication date to be announced).Google Scholar
Garnett, J. C. M. General ability, cleverness and purpose. Brit. J. Psychol., 1919, 9, 345–366.Google Scholar
Holzinger, K. J., and Harman, H. H. Factor analysis: a synthesis of factorial methods, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J. educ. Psychol., 1933, 13, 223–298.Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. Essential traits of mental life. Harvard Studies in Education, Vol. 26, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Reyburn, H. A. Taylor, J. G. Some factors of intelligence. Brit. J. Psychol., 1941, 31, 259–270.Google Scholar
Reyburn, H. A., and Taylor, J. G. On the interpretation of common factors: a criticism and a statement. Psychometrika, 1943, 8, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. Abilities of man, London: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. The vectors of mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935.Google Scholar