Abstract
A rigorous and an approximate solution are found for the problem: Given a primary trait matrix forn tests andr 1 traits, and a matrix for the samen tests andr 2 reference axes, to discover the transformation which will transform the second matrix into the first, or primary trait matrix. Formulas for determining the limits of the effect of using the approximate solution are presented. The method is applied to a set of twenty hypothetical tests, defined by their loadings on four orthogonal primary traits. After factoring the inter-correlations of these variables by Thurstone's centroid method, approximating the diagonals, the original hypothetical matrix is reproduced with a root mean square discrepancy of .014 by assuming as known the primary trait loadings of only the first eight tests. The method is applied to the results of factoring two batteries of 14 tests, having 8 tests in common, to give the factor loadings of the two batteries on the same reference axes. The method provides a means of comparing directly and quantitatively the results of two different factor studies, provided they have tests in common, and of testing the stability of simple structure under changes in the battery. The relations of the method here developed to certain problems in multiple correlation are shown.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bôcher, Maxime. Introduction to higher algebra. New York: Macmillan, 1912, p. 78.
Eckhart, C., and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank.Psychometrika, 1936,1, 211–219.
Mosier, C. I. Influence of chance error on simple structure.Psychometrika, 1938,3, 33–44.
Thomson, G. H. Some points of mathematical technique in the factorial analysis of ability.J. Educ. Psychol., 1936,27, 37–54.
Thurstone, L. L. Vectors of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935, pp. xv + 266.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mosier, C.I. Determining a simple structure when loadings for certain tests are known. Psychometrika 4, 149–162 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288493
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288493