Skip to main content
Log in

The mental health orientation of juvenile courts

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective systems of care for youth with emotional disorders require shared values among stakeholders toward a variety of mental health issues. Juvenile courts represent one stakeholder group whose values can affect the delivery of services to young offenders with or at risk of emotional disturbances. This research uses statewide data from Tennessee to assess the mental health orientation (MHO) of juvenile courts, their use of treatment options for offenders, and whether MHO influences the treatment referral decision. Results show that courts have a positive MHO, but this subjective orientation does not correspond to higher treatment referral rates. Moreover, service referrals are at a considerably lower rate than estimates of need for this population of youth would predict. While positive MHO suggests a basis for nurturing the shared vision required for effective systems of care, other factors must be considered to account for courts' underutilization of treatment options for juvenile offenders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Babbie E.The Sociological Spirit. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Macionis J.Sociology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stroul B, Friedman R.A System of Care for Emotionally Disturbed Children and Youth. Washington, DC: CASSP Technical Assistance Center; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hodges S, Nesman T, Hernandez M. Promising practices: building collaboration in systems of care. In:Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children's Mental Health, 1998 Series, Volume VI. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson C, Pearson C.Integrating Services for Children and Youth with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Skiba R, Polsgrove L, Nasstrom K.Developing a System of Care: Collaboration for Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders. Reston, VA: The Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruner C.Thinking Collaboratively: Ten Questions and Answers To Help Policy Makers Improve Children's Services. Washington, DC: Education and Human Services Consortium; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. US Dept of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Juvenile Court Statistics 1988. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harstone E, Cocozza JJ. Providing services for the mentally ill, violent juvenile offenders. In: Mathias R, DeMuro P, Allison RA, eds.Violent Juvenile Offenders: An Anthology. Newark, NJ: National Council on Crime and Delinquency; 1984:157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McManus M, Alessi N, Grapentine WL, et al. Psychiatric disturbance in serious delinquents.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry. 1984;23:602–615.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers K, Powell E, Strock M. The characteristics of youth referred for mental health evaluation in the juvenile justice system. In: Willis J, Liberton C, Kutash K, Friedman R, eds.The 10th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida; 1998:329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fagan J. Community-based treatment for mentally disordered juvenile offenders.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1991;20:42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenstein J, Jacob H.Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown and Co; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stapleton VD, Aday D, Ito JA. An empirical typology of American metropolitan juvenile courts.American Journal of Sociology. 1982;88:549–564.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norusis MJ.SPSS Statistical Algorithms, Release 8.0. Chicago: SPSS, Inc; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Breda C. Determinants of juvenile court decisions to use mental health interventions. In: Willis J, Liberton C, Kutash K, Friedman R, eds.The 11th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida; 1999:267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glisson C. Judicial and service decisions for children entering state custody: the limited role of mental health.Social Service Review. 1996;70:257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niarhos F, Routh D. The role of clinical assessment in the juvenile court: predictors of juvenile disposition and recidivism.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1992;21:151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kelley TM. Clinical assessment and the detention, disposition, and treatment of emotionally disturbed delinquent youths.Journal of Criminal Justice. 1978;6:315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Feld B. The punitive juvenile court and the quality of procedural justice: disjunctions between rhetoric and reality.Crime and Delinquency. 1990;36:443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Connell P. Juvenile justice in the year 2005?Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1980;9:113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bazemore G, Umbreit M. Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: retributive or restorative responses to youth crime.Crime and Delinquency. 1995;41:296–316.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz I. Juvenile crime: the youth corrections agenda for the 1990s. In: Russell C, McCauley C, eds.Crime and Justice in the 1990s. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University; 1989:45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clynch E, Neubauer D. Trial courts as organizations.Law and Policy Quarterly. 1981;3:69–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn S. Breda PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breda, C.S. The mental health orientation of juvenile courts. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 28, 89–95 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287237

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287237

Keywords

Navigation