Skip to main content
Log in

Prey preferences ofPortia fimbriata, an araneophagic, web-building jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Portia fimbriata from Queensland, a previously studied jumping spider (Salticidae), routinely includes web-building spiders and cursorial salticids in its diet, both of these types of prey being dangerous and unusual prey for a salticid. The present paper is the first detailed study ofP. fimbriata's prey preferences. Three basic types of tests of prey preference were used, providing evidence that (1)P. fimbriata males and females prefer spiders (both web-building spiders in webs and salticids away from webs) to insects; (2)P. fimbriata males and females prefer salticids to web-building spiders; (3)P. fimbriata males and females prefer larger spiders to smaller spiders; (4) there are intersexual differences in the preferences ofP. fimbriata for prey size, females preferring larger prey and males preferring smaller prey; and (5)P. fimbriata's prey preferences are not affected by a prior period without food of 2 weeks. When preferences were tested for by using both living, active prey and dead, motionless lures, the same preferences were expressed, indicating thatP. fimbriata can distinguish among different types of prey independent of the different movement patterns of different prey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blest, A. D., and Carter, M. (1987). Morphogenesis of a tiered principal retina and the evolution of jumping spiders.Nature 328: 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blest, A. D., O'Carroll, D. C., and Carter, M. (1990). Comparative ultrastructure of Layer I receptor mosaics in principal eyes of jumping spiders: The evolution of regular arrays of light guides.Cell Tissue Res. 262: 445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristowe, W. S. (1941).The Comity of Spiders 2; Ray Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coddinton, J. A., and Levi, H. W. (1991). Systematics and evolution of spiders (Araneae).Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 565–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio, E. (1976).The Ethology of Predation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, B. (1980). Ant predation byHabrocestum pulex (Hentz) (Araneae: Salticidae).Zool. Anz. 204: 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, L. M. (1975). Predatory behavior of the zebra spider,Salticus scenicus (Araneae: Salticidae).Can. J. Zool. 53: 1284–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drees, O. (1952). Untersuchunger Über die angeborenen Verhaltensweisen bei Spingspinnen (Salticidae).Z. Tierpsychol. 9: 169–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. B., Carroll, J. F., and Whitcomb, W. H. (1974).Stoidis aurata (Araneae: Salticidae), a spider predator of ants.Fla. Entomol. 57: 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foelix, R. F. (1982)Biology of Spiders, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, L. M. (1982). Visual communication in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). In Witt, P. N., and Rovner, J. S. (eds.),Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 161–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, L. M. (1985). Target discrimination in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). In Barth, F. G. (ed.),Neurobiology of Arachnids, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed, A. N. (1984). Foraging behaviour in the jumping spiderPhidippus audax: Bases for selectivity.J. Zool. Lond. 202: 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. T. (1964). Hunger and sequential responses in the hunting behaviour of salticid spiders.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 58: 167–173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Givens, L. M. (1978). Dimorphic foraging strategies of a salticid spider (Phidippus audax).Ecology 59: 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, K. H. (1936). Beiträge zur Physiologie und Psychologie der Springspinnen.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 23: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann, H. (1928). Beträge zur Physiologie der Spinnenaugen. I. Untersuchungsmethoden, II. Das Sehvermöen der Salticiden.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 7: 201–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R. (1982). The behavior of communicating in jumping spiders (Salticidae). In Witt, P. N., and Rovner, J. S. (eds.),Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance: Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 213–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R. (1990a). Predatory versatility and intraspecific interactions ofCyrba algerina andC. ocellata, web-invading spartaeine jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae).N.Z. J. Zool. 17: 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R. (1990b). Predatory and silk utilisation behaviour ofGelotia sp. indet. (Araneae: Salticidae), a web-invading aggressive mimic from Sri Lanka.N. Z. J. Zool. 17: 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R. (1992). Eight-legged tricksters: Spiders that specialize in catching other spiders.BioScience 42: 590–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R., and Blest, A. D. (1982a). The biology ofPortia fimbriata, a web-building jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland: Utilization of webs and predatory versatility.J. Zool. Lond. 196: 255–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R., and Blest, A. D. (1982b). The distances at which a primitive jumping spider,Portia fimbriata, makes visual discriminations.J. Exp. Biol. 97: 441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R., and Hallas, S. E. A. (1986a). Comparative biology ofPortia africana, P. albimana, P. fimbriata, P. labiata, andP. schultzi, araneophagic, web-building jumping spiders (Aranene: Salticidae): Utilisation of webs, predatory versatility, and intraspecific interactions.N. Z. J. Zool. 13: 423–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R., and Hallas, S. E. A. (1986b). Predatory versatility and intraspecific interactions of spartaeine jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae):Brettus adonis, B. cingulatus, Cyrba algerina andPhaeacius spindet.N.Z. J. Zool. 13: 491–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R., and Tarsitano, M. S. (1993). Responses of jumping spiders to motionless prey.Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 9: 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R., and van Olphen, A. (1991). Prey-capture techniques and prey preferences ofCorythalia canosa andPystira orbiculata, ant-eating jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae).J. Zool. Lond. 223: 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R., and van Olphen, A. (1992). Prey-capture techniques and prey preferences ofChrysilla, Natta, andSiler, ant-eating jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Kenya and Sri Lanka.J. Zool. Lond. 227: 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F. (1969a). Structure of the retinae of the principal eyes of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in relation to visual optics.J. Exp. Biol. 51: 443–470.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F. (1969b). Movements of the retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae) in response to visual stimuli.J. Exp. Biol. 51: 471–493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F. (1971). Orientation by jumping spiders in the absence of visual feedback.J. Exp. Biol. 54: 119–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F. (1972). Stepping movements made by jumping spiders during turns mediated by the lateral eyes.J. Exp. Biol. 57: 15–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F. (1974). A comparison of the visual behavior of a predatory arthropod with that of a mammal. In Wiersma, C. A. G. (ed.),Invertebrate Neurons and Behavior, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Boston, pp. 411–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig, W. (1986). Non-webbuilding spiders: Prey specialists or generalists?Oecologia 69: 571–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prószyński, J. (1971). Notes on systematics of Salticidae (Arachnida: Aranei) I–VI.Ann. Zool. Warsz. 28: 227–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. H., and Valerio, C. E. (1977). Attack on large or heavily defended prey by tropical salticid spiders.Psyche 84: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry: The Principles of Statistics in Biological Research, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarsitano, M. S., and Jackson, R. R. (1992). Influence of prey movement on the performance of simple detours by jumping spiders.Behaviour 123: 106–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath, F., and Parker, G. A. (1992). Sexual dimorphism and distorted sex ratios in spiders.Nature 360: 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanless, F. R. (1978). A revision of the spider genusPortia (Araneae: Salticidae).Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 34: 83–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanless, F. R. (1984). A review of the spider subfamily Spartaeinae nom. n. (Araneae: Salticidae).Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 45: 135–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, D. H. (1993).Spiders in Ecological Webs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, D., Jackson, R.R. Prey preferences ofPortia fimbriata, an araneophagic, web-building jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland. J Insect Behav 9, 613–642 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213884

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213884

Key Words

Navigation