Abstract
Fictitious court cases involving child abuse were presented to 140 male undergraduates and 140 male junior high school students to determine if the tendency to deal harshly with alleged criminals is dependent upon certain defendant characteristics. Results indicate that younger adolescent jurors give longer sentences than older adolescent jurors, and male defendants receive longer sentences than female defendants. While no significant main effects for case content were found, younger jurors gave longer sentences and attributed more responsibility to a parent who beat his/her child, while older adolescent jurors attributed more responsibility and prescribed longer sentences to a parent who burned the child. Implications for future research with adolescent jurors are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bray, R. (1978). The effects of defendant status on the decisions of student and community juries.Soc. Psychol. 41: 256–260.
Bullock, H. (1961). Significance of the racial factor in the length of prison sentences.J. Crim. Law Criminol. Polit. Sci. 52: 411–417.
Feild, H. (1979). Rape trials and jurors' decisions: A psychological analysis of the effects of victim, defendant and case characteristics.Law Hum. Behav. 3: 261–284.
Fischer, S., Sison, G. F., Fehr, L. A., and McMahon, P. M. (1982). Defendant characteristics and juror personality effects on judgment behaviors of mock jurors. Paper presented at Eastern Psychological Association Conference, Baltimore.
Gerbasi, K. C., Zuckerman, M., and Reis, H. T. (1977). Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research.Psychol. Bull. 84: 323–345.
Jacobson, S., and Berger, C. (1974). Communication and justice: Defendant attributes and their effects on the severity of his sentence.Speech Monogr. 41: 282–286.
Jones, C., and Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 26: 214–419.
Kalven, H., and Zeisel, H. (1966).The American Jury, Little, Brown, Boston.
Kohlberg, L., and Kramer, R. (1969). Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development.Hum. Dev. 12: 93–120.
Miller, A. (1970). Social perception of internal-external control.Percept. Mot. Skills 30: 103–109.
Steinberg, Z. (1982). Director, Denver County Juvenile Diversion Program. Personal communication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received Ph.D. from Lehigh University, Major interests include adolescent and adult personality and social development, developmental abnormalities, and jury behavior.
Received Ph.D. from Lehigh University. Major interests are personality and sex-role development, and psychology and the law.
Received Ph.D. from the University of Cincinnati. Major interests are cognitive development, guilt feelings, and jury behavior.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ackerman, A.M., McMahon, P.M. & Fehr, L.A. Defendant characteristics and judgment behaviors of adolescent mock jurors. J Youth Adolescence 13, 123–130 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02089106
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02089106