Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the results of semi-thin sections with those of conventional paraffin histology and immunohistology in renal biopsy specimens

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One hundred renal biopsy specimens out of the routine material were investigated by the usual paraffin technique, by semi-thin sections and by the immunofluorescence technique. The findings were compared in regard of the diagnoses made by each technique. The results indicate that the paraffin technique is inadequate in a considerable proportion of the specimens, because very small glomerular lesions cannot be recognized. The semi-thin section technique enabled us to correct the light-microscopic diagnosis in 17 per cent, particularly in establishing membranous glomerulonephritis. In another 31 per cent the histologic diagnoses could be improved. The immunofluorescence technique provided evidence of active glomerulonephritis in 57 per cent (24 cases with immune complex nephritis and 3 cases with basement membrane antibody nephritis). We found a much closer correlation between results of the semi-thin section technique and immunohistology than between the paraffin technique and immunohistology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ben-Bassat, M., Stark, H., Bobson, M., Rosenfeld, J.: Value of routine electron microscopy in the differential diagnosis of the nephrotic syndrome.Path. Microbiol. 41, 26 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, J., Yaneva, H., Antoine, B.: Etude immunohistochimique des lésions glomérulaires.J. Urol. Néphrol. 75, 269 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ditscherlein, G., Marx, I., David, H., Schneider, W., Natusch, R.: Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Nierenbiopsiezylindern. 5. Tagung d. Ges. f. Pathologie d. DDR, 29–31. 8. 1974 in Dresden.Ergebn. exper. Med. (in the press).

  4. Ditscherlein, G., Dena, R.: Zur Aussagekraft von versilberten Semidünnschnitten in der histologischen Diagnostik von Nierenveränderungen.Zbl. allg. Path. 116, 113 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ditscherlein, G., Dena, R.: Einfache Semidünnschnittmethode, welche die Anwendung verschiedener Routinefärbungen gestattet.Zschr. med. Labortechnik 15, 302 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ditscherlein, G., Schneider, W.: Befunde bei membranöser Glomerulonephritis.Dtsch. Ges.-wesen (in the press).

  7. Ehrenreich, T., Churg, J.: Pathology of membranous nephropathy.Pathology annual 3 145 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Germuth, F. G., Rodriguez, E.: Immunopathology of the Renal Glomerulus. Immune Complex Deposit and Antibasement Membrane Disease. Little, Brown & Co., Boston 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hadley, W. K., Rosenau, W.: Study of human renal disease by immunofluorescent methods.Arch. Path. 83, 342 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Humair, L.: Bases immunologiques de néphropathies glomérulaires.Helv. med. Acta Suppl. 52 (1972).

  11. Kettler, L.-H., Ditscherlein, G., Schneider, W.: Zur Systematik der Glomerulonephritis unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Biopsiematerials.Dtsch. Ges.-wesen 28, 778 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCluskey, R. T.: The value of immunofluorescence in the study of human renal disease.J. exp. Med. 134, 242 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morel-Maroger, L., Leathem, A., Richet, G.: Glomerular abnormalities in nonsystemic diseases. Relationship between findings by light microscopy and immunofluorescence in 433 renal biopsy specimens.Amer. J. Med. 53, 170 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Movat, H. Z.: Silver impregnation methods for electron microscopy.Amer. J. clin. Path. 35, 528 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider, W.: Die Immunhistologie in der Nierenbiopsiediagnostik. 5. Tagung d. ges. f. Pathologie d DDR, 29.–31. 8. 1974 in Dresden.Ergebn. exper. Med. (in the press).

  16. Schneider, W.: Immunhistologie. In: Natusch, R. und Ditscherlein, G.: Nierenbiopsie. J. A. Barth Verlag, Leipzig 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siegel, N. J., Spargo, B. H., Kashgarian, M., Hayslett, J. P.: An evaluation of routine electron microscopy in the examination of renal biopsies.Nephron 10, 109 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thoenes, G. H.: Die Immunhistologie der Glomerulonephritis. Mittler zwischen Pathogenese und Morphologie.Klin. Wschr. 51, 739 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tighe, J. R., Jones, N. F.: The diagnostic value of routine electron microscopy of renal biopsies.Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 63, 475 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ditscherlein, G., Schneider, W. Comparison of the results of semi-thin sections with those of conventional paraffin histology and immunohistology in renal biopsy specimens. International Urology and Nephrology 8, 227–235 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082244

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02082244

Keywords