Abstract
The bibliographic database widely used for measurement of scientific production either for developed or developing countries isScience Citation Index. So then, in the case of LDCs only their negligible contribution to the “mainstream” of science is evaluated. Eight LDCs productivity as obtained fromSCI is compared to that from some international specialized or multidisciplinary databases, most of which give more information than SCI for each country. In the case of Cuba,Biosis and CA supply 17 and 15 times respectively more information than the SCI in the same period. The use of Cuban local database and its comparison with international ones is also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. D. Frame, Problems in the use of literature-based S & T indicators in developing countries,Science and Technology Indicators for Development,Hiroko Morita-Lou (Ed.) United Nations Science and Technology for Development Series, Westview Press, 1985, 207.
M. D. Gordon, Deficiences of scientific information access and output in less developed countries,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30 (1979), No. 6, 340–342.
J. Gaillard, Es visible la ciencia en el Tercer Mundo?Mundo Científico, 9 (1989) No. 93, 764–768.
S. Arunachalam, K. C. Garg, A small country in the world of big science. A preliminary bibliometric study of science in Singapore,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 301–313.
F. Spagnolo, Brazilian scientific publications and mainstream science: some policy implications. The case of Chemical and Electrical Engineering,Scientometrics, 18 (1990) 205–218.
R. Sancho, G. Bernal, L. Galvez, Analysis of the Cuban scientific activity by using national and international databases,45th Conference and Congress FID. La Habana, Cuba, 17–22 Sept, 1990.
R. Sancho, G. Bernal, G. La Serna, I. Garcia, Estudio estadístico y bibliométrico de la producción científica mundial sobre los derivados de la caña de azúcar (1983–1987).INFO-88, 17–22 Oct. 1988, La Habana, Cuba.
Ch. H. Davis, Th. O. Eisemon, Mainstream and non mainstream scientific literature in four peripheral Asian scientific communities,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 215–239.
M. Moravcsik, Strengthening the Coverage of Third World Science. International Task Force for Assessing the Scientific Output of the Third World. Final Report of the Philadelphia Workshop and of the Discussions Proceeding, July 1985.
E. Garfield, Mapping science in the Third World,Science and Public Policy, 10 (1983) 112–127.
J. D. Frame, F. Narin, P. Carpenter, The distribution of world science,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977), No. 4, 501–516.
E. Garfield, Third World research. Parts 1 and 2.Current Contents, 23 (1983), No. 33, 34.
A. Schubert, W. Glånzel, T. Braun, Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields, 1981–1985.Scientometrics, 16 (1989) 3–478.
T. Arends, Vinculación de Latinamerica a la literature científica y tecnológica international,Medicina, 35 (1975) 505–512.
M. Roche, T. Freites, Producción y flujo de información científica en un país perférico americano (Venezuela),Intercienca, 7 (1982) No. 5 279–290.
Y. M. Rabkin, H. Inhaber, Science on the periphery: a citation study in three less developed countries,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 261–274.
M. Krauskopf, P. Pessot, R. Vicuña, Science in Latin America. How much and along what lines?.Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 199–206.
J. D. Frame, Measuring scientific activity in lesser developed countries,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 133–145.
A. Schubert, S. Zsindely, T. Braun, Scientometric indicators for evaluating medical research output of mid-sized countries,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 155–163.
Yongyuth Yuthavong, Bibliometric indicators of scientific activity in Thailand,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 139–143.
J. Blickenstaff, M. Moravcsik, Scientific output in the Third World,Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 133–169.
J. D. Frame, F. Narin, Mainstream research in Latin American and the Caribbean,Interciencia, 2, (1977) 143–147.
F. Al-Kharafi, N. El-Rayyes, G. Janini Science research in Kuwait. A bibliometric study,Journal of Information Science: Principles and Practices, 13 (1987) No. 1, 37–44.
S. Arunachalam, K. C. Garg, Science on the periphery. A scientometric analysis of science in the ASEAN countries,Journal of Information Sciences: Principles and Practices, 12, (1986) No. 3, 105–118.
S. Arvanitis, Y. Chatelini National scientific strategies in tropical soil sciences,Social Studies of Science, 18 (1988) No. 1, 113–146.
IDRC, 1987. Searching. Research in small countries, International Development Research Center, Ontario, Canada, 1988.
L. Velho, J. Krige, Publication and citation practices of Brazilian agricultural scientists,Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984) 45–62.
B. Ubel, Cuba's great leap.Nature, 302 (1984) 745–748.
C. Galban, I. Gomez, Producción científica cubana en el área de la química a través del Chemical Abstracts,INFO-88, 17–22 Oct. 1988, La Havana, Cuba.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sancho, R. Misjudgments and shortcomings in the measurement of scientific activities in less developed countries. Scientometrics 23, 221–233 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020924
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020924