Skip to main content
Log in

Econometric analysis of biomedical research publishing patterns

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An econometric-type model was developed that describes the relationship between federal biomedical funding and the number, subject area and research level (clinical to basic) of published papers in biomedical journals. The study covered federal biomedical funding over the period 1962–1979 and biomedical literature counts over the period 1965–1979. A unique feature of the model was the explicit incorporation of the citation-based interrelationships among the various subfields and research levels of biomedicine.

Publication counts in a particular subject area were modeled as a function of federal funding to the area and publication activity in related subject areas. In general, publication activity in related subject areas was found to be a significant explanatory variable over and above funding alone. Moreover, clinically oriented subject areas most often had publication counts in related basic research areas as explanatory variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. NARIN, R. T. SHAPIRO, the extramural role of the NIH as a research support agency,Federation Proceedings, 36 (1977) 2470–2475.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. R. McALLISTER, D. A. WAGNER, Relationship between R & D expenditures and publication output for U. S. colleges and universities,Research in Higher Education, 15 (1981) 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. R. REISHER, F. NARIN,Bibliographic Methods for the Evaluation of Trends in Pulmonary and Hypertension Research, Contract No. N01-HO-8-2938 with the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 1980.

  4. F. NARIN, G. PINSKI, H. H. GEE, Structure of the biomedical literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (1976) 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Science Citation Index, Copyright 1983. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA.

  6. F. NARIN,Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Monograph, NTIS Accession #PB252339/AS, 1976.

  7. C. D. DOUGLASS,NIH IMPAC System: A Computer Information System on the Extramural Programs of NIH, NIH Division of Research Grants, Bethesda, MD, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. G. COCHRAN,Sampling Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY, 1963, p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. W. SNEDECOR, W. G. COCHRAN,Statistical Methods, Iowa State University Press, IA, 1967, p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McAllister, P.R., Condon, T. Econometric analysis of biomedical research publishing patterns. Scientometrics 7, 55–75 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020141

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020141

Keywords

Navigation