Skip to main content
Log in

Cefaclor versus amoxicillin in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia: A comparative double-blind study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A randomized double-blind controlled trial was carried out to compare the effectiveness and side-effects of cefaclor with those of amoxicillin in the treatment of 34 patients hospitalized because of acute bacterial pulmonary infection. Cefaclor and amoxicillin were given three times daily before meals in a dosage of 500 and 750 mg respectively for seven days. The cure rate was 94 % in the group of patients treated with cefaclor and 89 % in the group treated with amoxicillin. According to all the parameters used to assess outcome, no significant difference was found between the two antibiotics tested. In this study, cefaclor and amoxicillin appeared to be of equal value in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia or bronchopneumonia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobson, J. A., McCormick, J. B., Hayes, J. B., Thornsberry, C., Kirven, C.: Epidemiologic characteristics of infections caused by ampicillinresistantHaemophilus influenzae. Pediatrics 1976, 58: 388–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson, J. D.: Should ampicillin be abandoned for treatment ofHaemophilus influenzae? Pediatrics 1974, 45: 827–838.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Syriopoulou, V., Scheifele, D., Smithi, A. L., Perry, P. M., Howie, P.: Increasing incidence of ampicillin resistance inHaemophilus influenzae. Journal of Pediatrics 1978, 92: 889–892.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ward, J. I., Tsai, T. F., Filica, G. A., Fraser, D.: Prevalence of ampicillin and chloramphenicol-resistant strains ofHaemophilus influenzae causing meningitis and bacteremia: national survey of hospital laboratories. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1978, 138: 421–424.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartmann, K., Tarbuc, R.: In vitro activity of cefaclor againstHaemophilus influenzae in comparison to cephalexin, cephradine, cefadroxil, cefatrizine and ampicillin. Infection 1981, 9: 186–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neu, H. G., Fu, K. P.: Cefaclor: in vitro spectrum of activity and beta-lactamase stability. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1978, 13: 584–588.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Santoro, J., Levison, M. E.: In vitro activity of cefaclor, a new orally administrated cephalosporin antibiotic. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1977, 12: 442–443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Silver, M. S., Counts, G. W., Zeleznik, D., Turck, M.: Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of three oral cephalosporins: cefaclor, cephalexin and cephradine. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1977, 12: 591–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinai, R., Hammerberg, S., Marks, M. I., Pai, C. H.: In vitro susceptibility ofHaemophilus influenzae to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and cefaclor, cephalexin and cephradine. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1978, 13: 861–864.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yourassowsky, E., Schoutens, E.: In vitro bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of seven cephalosporin antibiotics onHaemophilus influenzae. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1975, 12: 433–436.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kammer, R. B., Short, L. J.: Cefaclor: summary of clinical experience. Infection 1979, 7 Supplement 6: 631–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mattson, K., Renkonen, O. V., Laitinen, L., Nikander-Hurme, R.: Treatment of acute bronchitis and pneumonia with cefaclor. Postgraduate Medical Journal 1979, 55 Supplement 4: 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mogabgab, W. J., Pollock, B., Beville, R. B., Gentry, L. O., Jemsek, J. G.: Treatment of acute bacterial bronchitis and pneumonia with cefaclor. Postgraduate Medical Journal 1979, 55 Supplement 4: 62–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McLinn, S. E.: Comparative study of cefaclor, a new cephalosporin and amoxicillin in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. Current Chemotherapy 1978, 1: 123–125.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, G. S., Kakati, R., Mahmoud, I. A.: A comparison of cefaclor and ampicillin in the treatment of respiratory infectious in elderly inpatients. Current Medical Research and Opinion 1980, 6: 564–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brodie, N. H., McGhie, R. L., O'Hara, J., Rahman, M. K., Vallé-Jones, J. C.: A double-blind study comparing cefaclor and amoxicillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infectious in general practive. Pharmatherapeutica 1980, 2: 494–498.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaffe, G. V., Grimshaw, J. J.: Comparative study of cefaclor and amoxicillin in the treatment of respiratory tract infectious in general practice. Current Medical Research and Opinion 1980, 6: 569–575.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartlett, J. G., Brewer, N. S., Ryan, K. J.: Laboratory diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infectiona. Cumitech 7, American Society of Microbiology, Washington, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ericsson, H. M., Sherris, J. C.: Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an International collaborative study. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 1971 Supplement 217: 1–90.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Macfarlane, J. T., Finch, R. G., Ward, M. J., Macrae, A. D.: Hospital study of adul community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet 1982, ii: 255–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leuenberger, P., Vrantchev, S. Cefaclor versus amoxicillin in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia: A comparative double-blind study. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 2, 11–16 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019916

Keywords

Navigation