Abstract
Although the field of scientometrics/bibliometrics is rapidly growing, and the interest in scientometric indicators is constantly rising, the field is in a crisis: subfields are drifting apart, the field is lacking consensus in basic questions and of internal communication, the quality of scientometric research is questioned by other disciplines. Among the causes stated are: the loss of integrating personalities; shift from basic and methodological research to applied bibliometrics; domination of the interests of science policy and business in commissioning and funding research; vendor policies and failing quality-management on the side of database-producers; misuse of bibliometric research results and disregard for scientific standards. To overcome the situation, the authors plead for integrative and interdisciplinary research approaches, for reinforcing fundamental, methodological and experimental research programs in scientometrics, for independent funding of research, and for an enhancement of scientometric databases. The need for acknowledged technical and scientific standards in research and publication is stressed. Finally, the establishment of aCode of Ethics for the field of scientometrics is proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. de Solla Price,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1963.
B. C. Brookes, Biblio-, Sciento-, Infor-metrics??? What are we talking about? In:Egghe, Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics 89/90, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990, 31–43.
O. Nacke, Informetrie. Ein neuer Name für eine neue Disziplin,Nachrichten für Dokumentation, 1979, 219–226.
M. Weinstock, Citation indices,Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 5 (1971) 16–40.
L. Egghe, R. Rousseau,Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.
J. P. Courtial,Introduction à la scientometrie, Anthropos, Paris, 1990.
A. F. J. van Raan, (Ed.),Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
E. Bujdosó,Bibliometria és tudománymetria, Országos Széchényi Könyvtár Könyvtártudományi és Módszertani Központ — MTA Könyvtára, Budapest, 1986.
I. K. Ravichandra Rao,Quantitative Methods for Library and Information Science, Wiley-Eastern 1983, Revised edition 1984.
U. Schoepflin, Zur Situation der Scientometrie in der BRD,Deutscher Dokumentartag 1990, 101–112, 1991.
A. J. Lotka, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity,J. Washington Acad. Sci., 16 (1926) 317–323.
S. C. Bradford, Sources of information on specific subjects,Engineering, 137 (1934) 85–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond?. Scientometrics 30, 375–384 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018107
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018107