Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Size and ageing of the scientific community in Chile

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The size and ageing of the Chilean scientific community was studied using as data the individuals actively engaged in research projects funded by the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT). Between 1982 and 1991, 4966 individuals participated at least once, either as responsible for the research or as qualified associate in one term of the funding period. From this population, 2765 persons can be considered further committed with scientific research. As for sex, about 30% of the researchers are women. Taking into account all the disciplines, and in addition to the fact that the size of the Chilean scientific community seems to be subcritical, the study reveals that the workforce has been ageing dangerously through the years. The number of young scientists becoming part of the scientific workforce is decreasing. Research in mathematics, physics and chemistry, although qualitatively competitive, relies only on an extremely small group of excellent scientists, situation which is seriously affecting the scientific capacity that the country needs. Biology, although with a higher number of individuals, exhibits a pattern of ageing which will also affects the possibilities to strengthen the scientific demands. The global context in which science develops, leads to a brain drain that Third World countries will have to overcome, implementing public policies to offer the support that young people require to nurture the scientific strength. Indigenous Ph. D. programs demand urgent attention of policy decision makers as well as from research universities which need to offer opportunities to substitute, when existing, their incompetent faculty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Three scientometric etudes on developing countries as a tribute to Michael Moravcsik,International Conference on Science Indicators for the Developing Countries, Paris. 1990.

  2. F. Saavedra, R. Vergara, Recursos humanos en investigación científica tecnológica: su participación en FONDECYT. CONICYT,Serie Estudios, No 21, (1989).

  3. J. J. Brunner, In:Educación Superior en América Latina: Cambios y desafíos, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Santiago de Chile, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Krauskopf, Scientometric indicators as a means to assess the performance of state supported universities in developing countries: the Chilean case,Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Krauskopf, R. Pessot, Science and University. Both demand more attention,Archivos de Biologia y Medicina Experimentales, 20 (1987) 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Krauskopf, A. M. Prat, A vision of research in Chile through some scientometric indicators,Archivos de Biologia y Medicina Experimentales, 23 (1990) 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. J. Brunner, Los problemas de la educación superior en Chile y su futuro,Material de Discusión, Programa FLACSO N o 86, FLACSO, Santiago de Chile, 1986.

  8. M. Roche, The establishment of a scientific community in a developing country,Interciencia, 12 (1987) 230–232.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Schubert, A. Telcs, Publication potential — An indicator of scientific strength for cross-national comparisons,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Schubert, A. Telcs, Estimation of the publication potential in 50 U.S. states and in the District of Columbia based on the frequency distribution of scientific productivity,Journal American Society for Information Science, 40 (1989) 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Publication productivity: From frequency distributions to scientometric indicators,Journal of Information Science, 16 (1990) 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Krauskopf, R. Pessot, Scientific activity in Chile. Publications registered during 1980–1982,Archivos de Biologia y Medicina Experimentales, 16 (1983) 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Krauskopf, R. Pessot, Science in Chile: Where is it going? An analysis of the present activity,Archivos de Biologia y Medicina Experimentales, 18 (1985) 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Krauskopf, R. Pessot, R. Vicuña, Science in Latin America. How much and along what lines,Scientometrics, 10 (1986) 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. M. Martins, R. Queiroz, O perfil do pesquisador brasileiro,Revista Brasileira de Technologia, 18 (1987) 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Pool, News & Comment. Who will do science in the 1990s?Science, 248 (1990) 433–435.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Lemoine, M. Roche, ¿Por qué la mujer hace ciencia en Venezuela?Acta Científica Venezolana, 38 (1987) 304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Niemeyer, In:Una visión de la comunidad científica nacional. Las actividades de investigación y desarrollo en Chile, (CPU Eds) Santiago de Chile, 1981, pp. 118–137.

  19. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, The newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact in physics, engineering and mathematics, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Te newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact in the life sciences and chemistry, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. D. Frame, Modelling national technological capacity with patent indicators,Scientometrics, 22 (1991) 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Patterns of Science and Technology Resources: 1987. Survey of science Resources Series National Science Foundation, USA, NSF.

  23. M. G. Finn, Foreign national scientists and engineers in the U.S. labor force, 1972–1982, In:The Roles of Internatinal Mobility of Scientists and Engineers. Proceedings of the Workshop,C. Ganz,G. Boggio (Eds), National Science Foundation, Commission of the European Communities. Washington D. C., 1985, pp. 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. G. Barber, R. P. Morgan, The impact of foreign graduate students on engineering education in the United States,Science, 236 (1987) 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  25. New Directions for U.S.-Latin American Cooperation in Science and Technology. Final Report. Prepared for National Science Foundation, National Aeronautic and Space Administration, and Department of Energy, Washington. D. C. SRI International/Washington, 1988.

  26. L. De Meis, P. H. Longo, The training of Brazilian biochemists in Brazil and in developed countries: Costs and benefits,Biochemical Education, 18 (1990) 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Technológica, Santiago, (Chile)

    F. Saavedra & Mary Rose Mackenzie

  2. Instituto de Bioquimica, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, (Chile)

    R. Pessot & M. Krauskopf

Authors
  1. F. Saavedra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Rose Mackenzie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Pessot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Krauskopf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saavedra, F., Mackenzie, M.R., Pessot, R. et al. Size and ageing of the scientific community in Chile. Scientometrics 27, 105–117 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016545

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016545

Keywords

Search

Navigation