Skip to main content
Log in

Nodes, networks, and MUMs: Preserving diversity at all scales

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present focus of practical conservation efforts is limited in scope. This narrowness results in an inability to evaluate and manage phenomena that operate at large spatiotemporal scales. Whereas real ecological phenomena function in a space-time mosaic across a full hierarchy of biological entities and processes, current conservation strategies address a limited spectrum of this complexity. Conservation typically is static (time-limited), concentrates on the habitat content rather than the landscape context of protected areas, evaluates relatively homogeneous communities instead of heterogeneous landscapes, and directs attention to particular species populations and/or the aggregate statistic of species diversity. Insufficient attention has been given to broad ecological patterns and processes and to the conservation of species in natural relative abundance patterns (native diversity).

The authors present a conceptual scheme that evaluates not only habitat content within protected areas, but also the landscape context in which each preserve exists. Nodes of concentrated ecological value exist in each landscape at all levels in the biological hierarchy. Integration of these high-quality nodes into a functional network is possible through the establishment of a system of interconnected multiple-use modules (MUMs). The MUM network protects and buffers important ecological entities and phenomena, while encouraging movement of individuals, species, nutrients, energy, and even habitat patches across space and time. An example is presented for the southeastern USA (south Georgia-north Florida), that uses riparian and coastal corridors to interconnect existing protected areas. This scheme will facilitate reintroduction and preservation of wide-ranging species such as the Florida panther, and help reconcile species-level and ecosystem-level conservation approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Allen, T. F. H., and Starr, T. B. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 310 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Big Cypress Area Management Task Force. 1984. Sensitive natural resources of the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. Unpublished report to Florida governor and members of the cabinet.

  • Bonnicksen, T. M., and E. C. Stone. 1982. Reconstruction of a presettlement giant sequoia—mixed conifer forest community using the aggregation approach.Ecology 63:1134–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, F. H., and G. E. Likens. 1979. Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York, 253 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R. 1956. Gap phase replacement in a maple-basswood forest.Ecology 37:598–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F. E. 1936. Nature and structure of the climax.Journal of Ecology 24:252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. S. 1913. The climax forest of Isle Royale, Lake Superior, and its development.Botanical Gazette 55:1–44, 115–140, and 189–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, H. S., R. G. Hooper, and R. W. Titterington. 1981. Songbird population response to silvicultural practices in central Appalachian hardwoods.Journal of Wildlife Management 45:680–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. K. 1971. Competition, disturbance and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community.Ecological Monographs 41:351–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M. 1975. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural preserves.Biological Conservation 7:129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M. 1976. Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations.Science 193:1027–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M. 1981. Current issues in conservation.Nature 289:350–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell, G. B. 1983. The natural area movement in the United States, its past and its future.Natural Areas Journal 3(4):47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, J. H. 1980. The need for comprehensive wildlife programs in the United States: a summary. Council Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, 23 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. 1983. Corridors in a landscape: their ecological structure and function.Ekologiya (CSSR) 2:375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T., and J. Baudry. 1984. Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology.Environmental Management 8:495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology.BioScience 31:733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. B. 1980. Heterogeneity and disturbance in tropical vegetation. Pages 75–92in M. E. Soule and B. A. Wilcox (eds.), Conservation biology: an ecological-evolutionary perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, T., and W. G. Bradley. 1984. Effects of a highway on Mojave Desert rodent populations.American Midland Naturalist 111:47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garwood, N. C., D. P. Janos, and N. Brokow. 1979. Earthquake-caused landslides: a major disturbance to tropical Forests.Science 205:997–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graul, W. D., and G. C. Miller. 1984. Strengthening ecosystem management approaches.Wildlife Society Bulletin 12:282–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, N. G. 1959. Species abundance and community organization.Ecology 40:404–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, L. 1977. Landscape ecology and stability of populations.Landscape Planning 4:85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D. 1984a. The fragmented forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 211 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D. 1984b. Bottomland hardwoods: valuable, vanishing, vulnerable. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida Special Publication 28, 20 pp.

  • Harris, L. D., and R. F. Noss. 1985. Problems in categorizing the status of species: endangerment with best of intentions.In 16th IUCN technical meeting, Madrid, Spain, November 1984 (in press).

  • Henderson, M. T., G. Merriam, and J. Wegner. 1985. Patchy environments and species survival: chipmunks in an agricultural mosaic.Biological Conservation 31:95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. E. 1978. Heritage classification: the elements of ecological diversity.Nature Conservancy News 38(1):24–25 and 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. 1967. The ghost in the machine. Macmillan, New York, 384 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushlan, J. A. 1979. Design and management of continental wildlife reserves: lessons from the Everglades.Biological Conservation 15:281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A., and R. T. Paine. 1974. Disturbance, patch formation and community structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 71:2744–2747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, T. E., and D. C. Oren. 1981. The minimum critical size of ecosystems. Pages 7–12in R. L. Burgess and D. M. Sharpe (eds.) Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Task Force. 1974. Criteria and guidelines for the choice and establishment of biosphere reserves. MAB Report Series 22. Unesco, Paris, 61 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader, H.-J. 1984. Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields.Biological Conservation 29:81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C., and M. B. Usher. 1981. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review.Biological Conservation 24:115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J. 1983. Geometric forms known as fractals find sense in chaos.Smithsonian 14(9): 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S.J. 1984. Grazing lawns: animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution.American Naturalist 124:863–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., R. C. Peterson, and C. F. Nimz. 1985. Species richness in streams of different size from the same drainage basin.American Naturalist 125:16–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, Z., and A. S. Lieberman. 1984. Landscape ecology: theory and application. Springer-Verlag, New York, 356 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity.BioScience 33:700–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1985a. On characterizing presettlement vegetation: how and why.Natural Areas Journal 5(1):5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1985b. Landscape considerations in reintroducing and maintaining the Florida Panther: design of appropriate preserve networks. Unpublished report submitted to the Florida Panther Technical Advisory Council, 32 pp. + figures.

  • Odum, H. T. 1983. Systems ecology: an introduction. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 644 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity.American Naturalist 100:65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. T., and S.A. Levin. 1981. Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of pattern.Ecological Monographs 51:145–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., and J. N. Thompson. 1978. Patch dynamics and the size of nature reserves.Biological Conservation 13:27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. 1975. Ecological diversity. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, R. M. 1980. Management of nature reserves. Pages 319–327in M. E. Soule and B. A. Wilcox (eds.), Conservation biology: an ecological-evolutionary perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risser, P. G., J. R. Karr, and R. T. T. Forman. 1984. Landscape ecology: directions and approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 2. Champaign, Illinois, 18 pp.

  • Romme, W. H., and D. H. Knight. 1982. Landscape diversity: the concept applied to Yellowstone Park.BioScience 32:664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, R. B. 1973. Organization of a plant—arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea).Ecological Monographs 43:95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox, C. M., S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and W. L. Thomas. 1983. Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, 722 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, W. P. 1979. Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the nonequilibrium maintenance of species diversity.Ecology 60:1225–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, W. P. 1984. Intertidal mosaics: patch size, propagule availability, and spatially variable patterns of succession.Ecology 65:1918–1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprugel, D. G. 1976. Dynamic structure of wave-regeneratedAbies balsamea forests in the north-eastern United States.Journal of Ecology 64:889–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprugel, D. G., and F. H. Bormann. 1981. Natural disturbance and the steady state in high-altitude balsam fir forests.Science 211:390–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States National Park Service. 1978. Management policies. USDI, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J. 1984. The guild concept applied to management of bird populations.Environmental Management 8:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A. 1983. Conservation and the land. Pages 19–39in A. Warren and F. B. Goldsmith (eds.), Conservation in perspective. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, A. S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community.Journal of Ecology 35:12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. R., R. T. Clarke, and J. T. Nicholas. 1984. Invertebrate diversity on fragmented Calluna-heartland: Effects of surrounding vegetation.Journal of Biogeography 11:41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. S. 1979. Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation.Botanical Review 45:229–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. S., and S. P. Bratton. 1980. After preservation: philosophical and practical problems of change.Biological Conservation 18:241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., and S. A. Levin. 1977. The role of mosaic phenomena in natural communities.Theoretical Population Biology 12:117–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E. O. 1974. Populations and local extinctions of birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.Ecological Monographs 44:153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. E. 1974. Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.Science 186:487–495.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noss, R.F., Harris, L.D. Nodes, networks, and MUMs: Preserving diversity at all scales. Environmental Management 10, 299–309 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867252

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867252

Key words

Navigation