Skip to main content
Log in

All 0–1 polytopes are traveling salesman polytopes

  • Published:
Combinatorica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the facial structure of two important permutation polytopes in\(\mathbb{R}^{n^2 } \), theBirkhoff orassignment polytopeB n , defined as the convex hull of alln×n permutation matrices, and theasymmetric traveling salesman polytopeT n , defined as the convex hull of thosen×n permutation matrices corresponding ton-cycles. Using an isomorphism between the face lattice ofB n and the lattice of elementary bipartite graphs, we show, for example, that every pair of vertices ofB n is contained in a cubical face, showing faces ofB n to be fairly special 0–1 polytopes. On the other hand, we show thatevery 0–1d-polytope is affinely equivalent to a face ofT n , ford∼logn, by showing that every 0–1d-polytope is affinely equivalent to the asymmetric traveling salesman polytope of some directed graph withn nodes. The latter class of polytopes is shown to have maximum diameter [n/3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. I. Barvinok: Combinatorial complexity of orbits in representations of the symmetric group,Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 9, 1992, pp 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. J. Billera, andA. Sarangarajan: The combinatorics of permutation polytopes, in L. Billera, C. Greene, R. Simion and R. Stanley, eds.,Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Vol 24, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Brualdi, andP. Gibson: Convex polyhedra of doubly stochastic matrices, I, II, III,Journal of Combin. Theory, A22 (1977), 192–230; B22 (1977), 175–198; A22 (1977), 338–351.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Emelichev, M. M. Kovalev, andM. K. Kravtsov:Polytopes, Graphs and Optimization, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1984, 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. L. Lawler, J. K. Lenstra, A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, andD. B. Shmoys, eds.:The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization, Wiley, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. L. Lovász, andM. D. Plummer:Matching Theory, Elsevier Science Pub. Co., New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. R. Rao: Adjacency of the traveling salesman tours and 0–1 vertices,SIAM J. Appl. Math.,30, (1976), 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Ziegler:Lectures on Polytopes, Graduate Text in Mathematics 152, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. (Updates and corrections available athttp://winnie.math.tu-berlin.de/∼ziegler/.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Partially supported by NSF grant DMS-9207700.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Billera, L.J., Sarangarajan, A. All 0–1 polytopes are traveling salesman polytopes. Combinatorica 16, 175–188 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01844844

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01844844

Mathematics Subject Classification (1991)

Navigation