Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

A biomass productivity model based on soil properties and climate is developed from literature and used to evaluate and compare potential effects of mining and reclamation on several soils in the continental United States. Soil productivity is assumed to vary as a product of root distribution function modified by five soil properties: available water, aeration porosity, bulk density, electrical conductivity, and pH. Yield limiting property levels are derived from literature and input soil data are obtained from available USDA Soil Conservation Service information on typical profiles. Modelled values of potential productivity after mining, indicate problems and limitations to be expected. The proposed model can be used as a guide to reclamation strategy, to restore the land to premining conditions, or at times to enhance productivity of a reclaimed area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, F. 1981. “Alleviating chemical toxicities,” p.269in G.F. Arkin and H.M. Taylor (ed.)Modifying the Root Environment to Reducing Stress, ASAE Monograph No. 4, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, R.S. and Westcot, D.W. 1976. Water quality for agriculture, Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.D. 1981. “Alleviating mechanical impedance,” p.2111in G.F. Arkin and H.M. Taylor (ed.)Modifying the Root Environment to Reducing Stress, ASAE Monograph No. 4, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, C.A., Ogata, G., and Tucker, J.M. 1968. Sodium hazard of irrigation waters as influenced by leaching fraction and by precipitation or solution of calcium carbonate,Soil Sci. 106, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannell, R.Q. and Jackson, M.B. 1981. “Alleviating aeration stress,” p.191in G.F. Arkin and H.M. Taylor (ed),Modifying the Root Environment to Reducing Stress, ASAE Monograph No. 4, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, H., Goertzen, J.O., and Rhoades, J.D. 1978. Effects of clay type and content, exchangeable sodium percentage, and electrolyte concentration on clay disperson and soil hydraulic conductivity,Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W.R. 1964. Relation of root distribution to water uptake and availability,Agronomy J. 56, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, G.J. 1981. “Alleviating salinity stress,” pages 305–341in G.F. Arkin and H.M. Taylor (ed.) Modifying the Root Environment to Reducing Stress, ASAE Monograph No. 4, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, F.W. 1971. “The prediction of amounts and depth distribution of water in a well-drained soil,” M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, H. 1980. The Soil Resource:Ecological Studies 37, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiniry, L.N., Scrivner, C.L., and Keener, M.E. A soil productivity index based upon predicted water depletion and root growth, Research Bulletin 1051, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

  • Lieth, H. 1975. “Modeling the primary productivity of the world,”in H. Lieth and R.H. Whittaker (ed.)Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, L.L. (L.N. Kiniry). 1979. An evaluation of soil productivity based on root growth and water depletion, Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, J.D. and Rhoades, J.D. 1976. Various indices for evaluating the effective salinity and sodicity of irrigation waters,Proceedings of the International Salinity Conference, Texas Tech. Univ., Lubbock, TX, August 1976, 1–14.

  • Pearson, R.W., 1965. “Soil environment and root development,” p.9511,in N.H. Pierre (ed.)Plant Environment and Efficient Water Use, American Society of Agronomy, 677 South Segoe Road, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G.W., Cunningham, R.L., and Matelski, R.P. 1968. Moisture characteristics of Pennsylvania soils: moisture retention as related to texture,Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32, 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, R.C. and Bower, C.A. 1960. Use of high salt waters as a flocculent and source of divalent cations for reclaiming sodic soils,Soil Sci. 90, 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, J.D. 1972. Quality of water for irrigation,Soil Sci. 113, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, J.D. 1982. Reclamation and management of salt-deffected soils after drainage, Soil and Water Management Seminar, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, Nov. 29–Dec. 2.

  • Shainberg, I., Rhoades, J.D., Suarez, D.L., and Prather, R.J. 1981. Effect of mineral weathering on clay dispersion and hydraulic conductivity of sodic soils,Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45, 287–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 1975. Soil taxonomy, Agriculture Handbook No. 436, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurway, C.H. 1941. Soil reaction (pH) preferences of plants, Michigan Agric. Exp. Sta. Spec. Bull. 306.

  • Suarez, D.L., Rhoades, J.D., Lavado, R., and Grieva, C.M. 1984. Effect of pH on saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil dispersonSoil Sci. Soc. Am. J. (in press).

  • Taylor, H.M. and Terrell, E.E. 1982. “Rooting pattern and plant productivity,”in Miloslav Rechligl, Jr. (ed.)Handbook of Agricultural Productivity, Vol. 1, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi, V. and Peck, R.B. 1948.Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, p.5611, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite, C.W. 1984. An approach towards a national classification of climate, Geographical Review 38, 55–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, D. and Rogowski, A.S. 1969. Hydrologic and morphologic implications of anisotropy and infiltration in soil profile development,Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 33, 594–599.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogowski, A.S. Evaluation of potential topsoil productivity. Environ Geochem Health 7, 87–97 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01783555

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01783555

Keywords

Navigation