Summary
Although ‘utility’ has been the central concept in economics, economists have paid relatively little attention to its measurement. Generally, utility is measured indirectly via the revealed preference approach. We discuss problems with this approach and next introduce alternative ‘direct’ measurement methods. The direct measurement methods are seen to spawn a so-called theory of preference formation, which explains differences in utility functions of different individuals. The similarities of this theory with related theories in sociology and psychology, and various sorts of empirical evidence, are reviewed. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of these findings for economic theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassis, M.S., ‘The Campus as a Frog Pond: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment,’American Journal of Sociology, LXXXII (1977), pp. 1318–1326.
Battalio, R.C., E.B. Fisher, J.H. Kagel, R.L. Bassman, R.C. Winkler and L. Krasner, ‘A Test of Consumer Demand Theory Using Observations of Individual Consumer Purchases,’Western Economic Journal, XI (1973), pp. 411–425.
Battalio, R.C., J.H. Kagel and M.O. Reynolds, ‘A Note on the Distribution of Earnings and Output per Hour in an Experimental Economy,’Economic Journal, LXXXVIII (1978), pp. 822–829.
Bentham, J., ‘An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation,’ Reprinted in: N.A. Page (ed.),Utility Theory. A Book of Readings, New York, 1823.
Christensen, L.R., D.W. Jorgenson and L.J. Lau, ‘Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions,’American Economic Review, LXV (1975), pp. 367–383.
Dagenais, D.L., ‘Evaluating Public Goods from Individual Welfare Functions,’European Economic Review, IX (1977), pp. 123–149.
Darrough, M., R.A. Pollak and T.J. Wales, ‘Dynamic and Stochastic Structure: An Analysis of Three Time Series of Household Budget Studies,’Review of Economics and Statistics, LXV (1983), pp. 274–281.
Davis, J.A., ‘A Formal Interpretation of the Theory of Relative Deprivation,’Sociometry, XXII (1959), pp. 280–296.
Davis, J.A., ‘The Campus as a Frog Pond: An Application of the Theory of Relative Deprivation to Career Decisions of College Men,’American Journal of Sociology, LXXII (1966), pp. 17–31.
Debreu, G.,Theory of Value, London, 1959.
Duesenberry, J.S., Income,Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Cambridge, MA, 1949.
Duncan, O.D., ‘Does Money Buy Satisfaction?,’Social Indicators Research, II (1975), pp. 267–274.
Easterlin, R.A., ‘Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence,’ in: P.A. David and M.W. Reder (eds.),Nations and Households in Economic Growth. Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz, New York, 1974.
Edwards, P. (ed.),The Encylopaedia of Philosophy, Vol. 8, London, 1967.
Grether, D.M., ‘Recent Psychological Studies of Behavior under Uncertainty,’American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, LXVIII (1978), pp. 70–74.
Helson, H., ‘Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior, New York, 1964.
Helson, H., ‘Adaptation-Level Theory: 1970-And After,’ in: M.H. Appley (ed.),Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium, New York, 1971.
Helson, H. and A. Kozaki, ‘Anchor Effects using Numerical Estimates of Simple Dot Patterns,’Perception and Psychophysics, IV (1968), pp. 163–164.
Houthakker, H.S., ‘Revealed Preference and the Utility Function,’Economica, XVII (1950), pp. 159–174.
Houthakker, H.S. and L.D. Taylor, ‘Consumer Demand in the United States: Analysis and Projections, 2nd. ed., Cambridge, MA, 1970.
Jorgenson, D.W. and L.J. Lau, ‘The Integrability of Consumer Demand Functions,’European Economic Review, IIX (1979), pp. 115–147.
Kapteyn, A., ‘A Theory of Preference Formation,’ Ph.D. thesis, Leyden University, 1977.
Kapteyn, A., T.J. Wansbeek and J. Buyze, ‘Maximizing or Satisficing?,’Review of Economics and Statistics, LXI (1979), pp. 549–563.
Kapteyn, A., T.J. Wansbeek and J. Buyze, ‘The Dynamics of Preference Formation,’Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, I (1980), pp. 123–157.
Kapteyn, A. and T.J. Wansbeek, ‘Empirical Evidence on Preference Formation,’Journal of Economic Psychology, II (1982), pp. 137–149.
Koopmans, T.C., ‘Representation of Preference Orderings over Time,' in: C.B. McGuire and R. Radner (eds.),Decision and Organization, A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak, Amsterdam, 1973.
Lea, S.E.G., ‘Animal Experiments in Economic Psychology,’Journal of Economic Psychology, I (1981), pp. 245–271.
Manser, M.E., ‘Elasticities of Demand for Food: An Analysis Using Non-additive Utility Functions Allowing for Habit Formation,’Southern Economic Journal, XLVII (1976), pp. 879–891.
Merton, R.K. and A.S. Kitt, ‘Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior,’ in: R.K. Merton and P.F. Lazarsfeld (eds.),Continuities in Social Research, Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier,’ Glencoe-II, 1950.
Muellbauer, J., ‘Testing the Barten Model of Household Composition Effects and the Cost of Children,’Economic Journal, XXCVII (1977), pp. 460–487.
Muellbauer, J., ‘The Estimation of the Prais-Houthakker Model of Equivalence Scales,’Econometrica, IIL (1980), pp. 153–176.
Phlips, L., ‘A Dynamic Version of the Linear Expenditure Model,’Review of Economics and Statistics, LIV (1972), pp. 450–458.
Phlips, L.,Applied Consumption Analysis, Amsterdam, 1974.
Pollak, R.A., ‘Endogenous Tastes in Demand and Welfare Analysis,’American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, LXVIII (1978), pp. 374–379.
Ross, M. and J. Thibaut, ‘Determinants of Standards of Judgment,’Journal of Personality, XLII (1974), pp. 383–398.
Runciman, W. G.,Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, London, 1966.
Samuelson, P.A., ‘A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behavior,’Economica, V (1938), pp. 61–71.
Schoemaker, P., ‘The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Linitations,’Journal of Economic Literature, XX (1982), pp. 529–563.
Stigler, G.J., ‘The Development of Utility Theory,’Journal of Political Economy, LVIII (1950), pp. 307–327, 373–396. Reprinted in: A.N. Page (ed.),Utility Theory. A Book of Readings, New York.
Stigler, G.J. and G.S. Becker, ‘De Gustibus non est Disputandum,’American Economic Review, LXVII (1977), pp. 76–90.
Stouffer, S.A., E.A. Suchman and L.C. DeVinney, S.A. Star, R.M. Williams Jr.,The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life, Princeton NJ, 1949.
Van Herwaarden, F.G. and A. Kapteyn, ‘Empirical Comparison of the Shape of Welfare Functions,’European Economic Review, XV (1981), pp. 261–286.
Van der Leeuw, J.L., ‘De toekomst in retrospectief. Over de voorspelkwaliteit van de macroeconomische verkenning,’Economisch Statistische Berichten, LXIX (1984), pp. 160–163.
Van Praag, B.M.S.,Individual Welfare Functions and Consumer Behavior, Amsterdam, 1968.
Van Praag, B.M.S., ‘The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation,’European Economic Review, II (1971), pp. 337–369.
Van de Stadt, H.A. Kapteyn and S.A. van de Geer, ‘The Relativity of Utility: Evidence from Panel Data,’Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming (1985).
Von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern,Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed., New York, 1944.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This is a slightly adapted version of my inaugural address at Tilburg University. I thank Tom Wansbeek for his helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kapteyn, A. Utility and economics. De Economist 133, 1–20 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01675959
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01675959