Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization ofin vivo acid secretory responses of rabbit with comparison to dog and rat

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even though rabbit gastric glands are a commonly used model for the study of gastric physiology, little is known about the secretion of gastric acid in the rabbit in vivo.Gastric acid secretion in response to pentagastrin, histamine, and bethanechol stimulation, and the effect of specific cholinergic and histamine H 2 -receptor blockers was studied in 62 urethane-anesthetized rabbits. Additionally, the responses of eight conscious rabbits prepared with chronic gastric fistula were compared with similarly prepared conscious dogs (n=10) and conscious rats (n=18). In anesthetized rabbits, maximal pentagastrin stimulation resulted in acid outputs only 22% that of maximal histamine stimulation, but this was enhanced by restoring cholinergic tone with a subthreshold infusion of bethanechol. In conscious rabbits, pentagastrin was an effective stimulant, resulting in maximal acid output 70% that of maximal histamine stimulation. This is in contrast to the in vitrofindings reported reported by others utilizing isolated gastric glands and cells. Histamine was a potent stimulant of acid secretion in both the anesthetized and conscious rabbit, an observation that parallels the in vitrofindings. Unlike the dog and rat, atropine was ineffective as an inhibitor of histamine-stimulated acid secretion in the conscious rabbit, although it was marginally effective against histamine in anesthetized rabbits and against pentagastrin in conscious rabbits. It is concluded that cholinergic tone plays a crucial role in pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion in the rabbit. This may be an explanation for the poor response to pentagastrin described in isolated rabbit gastric gland preparations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soll AH: The actions of secretagogues on oxygen uptake by isolated mammalian parietal cells. J Clin Invest 61:370–380, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chew CS, Hersey SJ: Gastrin stimulation of isolated gastric glands. Am J Physiol 242:G504-G512, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Soll AH, Berglindh T: Physiology of isolated gastric glands and parietal cells: receptors and effectors regulating function.In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. LR Johnson (ed). New York, Raven Press, 1987, pp 883–909

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goto Y, Debas HT: GABA-mimetic effect on gastric acid secretion: Possible significance in central mechanisms. Dig Dis Sci 28(1):56–60, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. NIH Publication No. 86-23. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 1985

  6. Berglindh T, Helander HF, Obrink KJ: Effect of secretagogues on oxygen consumption, aminopyrine accumulation and morphology in isolated gastric glands. Acta Physiol Scand 97:401–414, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berglindh T, Sachs G, Takeguchi N: Ca2+-dependent secretagogue stimulation in isolated rabbit gastric glands. Am J Physiol 239:G90-G94, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nylander O, Bergqvist E, Obrink KJ: Dual inhibitory actions of somatostatin on isolated gastric glands. Acta Physiol Scand 125:111–119, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soll AH, Amirian DA, Thomas LP, Reedy TJ, Elashoff JD: Gastrin receptors on isolated canine parietal cells. J Clin Invest 73:1434–1447, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berglindh T: The mammalian gastric parietal cellin vitro. Annu Rev Physiol 46:377–392, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brimblecombe RW, Duncan WAM, Durant GJ, Emmett JC, Ganellin CR, Parsons ME: Cimetidine—A non-thiourea H2-receptor antagonist. J Int Med Res 3:86–92, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirschowitz BI, Gibson RG: Effect of cimetidine on stimulated gastric secretion and serum gastrin in the dog. Am J Gastroenterol 70:437–447, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirschowitz BI, Sachs G: Atropine inhibition of insulin-, histamine-, and pentagastrin-stimulated gastric electrolyte and pepsin secretion in the dog. Gastroenterology 56:693–702, 1969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Porro GB, Prada A, Petrillo M, Grossi M: Inhibition of pentagastrin and insulin-stimulated gastric secretion by pirenzipine in healthy and duodenal ulcer subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 14(57):63–67, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stockbrugger R, Jaup B, Hammer R, Dotevall G: Inhibition of gastric acid secretion by pirenzipine (LS519) in man. Scand J Gastroenterol 14:615–620, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soll AH: Secretagogue stimulation of14C-aminopyrine accumulation by isolated canine parietal cells. Am J Physiol 238:G366-G375, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lane A, Ivy AC, Ivy EK: Response of the chronic gastric fistula rat to histamine. Am J Physiol 190:221–228, 1957

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gardner JD, Jackson MJ, Batzri S, Jensen RT: Potential mechanisms of interaction among secretagogues. Gastroenterology 74:348–354, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soll AH, Lewin KJ, Beaven MA: Isolation of histaminecontaining cells from rat gastric mucosa: Biochemical and morphologic differences from mast cells. Gastroenterology 80:717–727, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cox RH, Bagshaw RJ: Influence of anesthesia on the response to cartoid hypotension in dogs. Am J Physiol 237:H424-H432, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulvihill, S.J., Pappas, T.N. & Debas, H.T. Characterization ofin vivo acid secretory responses of rabbit with comparison to dog and rat. Digest Dis Sci 34, 895–904 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540276

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540276

Key words

Navigation