Skip to main content
Log in

Primary production: Terrestrial ecosystems

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The history of growth in understanding of primary productivity and in making estimates of biosphere production is reviewed. Two approaches to estimation of land production are discussed. Production may first be estimated by mean values for ecosystem types and the areas of these. A total production of 100×10 9 tons/year is thus estimated for the continents, making up 29% of the earth's surface. The energy content of net primary production is 426×1018 cal for the continents and 261×1018 cal for the seas, implying a biosphere energy efficiency of 0.13% relative to incident sunlight of the full spectrum at the earth's surface. As a second approach, the relation of productivity to mean annual temperature and precipitation is analyzed. On the basis of these relationships, a “Miami model” map of primary productivity of the continents is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Art, H. W., and Marks, P. L. (1971). A summary table of biomass and net annual primary production in forest ecosystems of the world. InForest Biomass Studies, International Union of Forest Research Organizations Conference, Section 25, Gainesville, Fla.; Life Science and Agriculture Experiment Station, University of Maine, Orono, pp. 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Art, H. W., Marks, P. L., and Scott, J. T. (1971). Productivity profile of New York. Eastern Deciduous Forest Biome US-IBP Memo Report No. 71-12, unpaginated.

  • Aruga, Y., and Monsi, M. (1963). Chlorophyll amount as an indicator of matter productivity in bio-communities.Plant Cell Physiol. 4:29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandhu, D. (1971). A study of the productive structure of tropical dry deciduous forest at Varanasi. Thesis, Benares Hindu University, Varanasi, 111 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazilevich, N. I., and Rodin, L. E. (1971) Geographical regularities in productivity and the circulation of chemical elements in the earth's main vegetation types.Soviet Geog. Rev. Transl. 12(1):24–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazilevich, N. I., Drozdov, A. V., and Rodin, L. E. (1968). Productivity of the plant cover of the earth, general regularities of its distribution and relation to climatic factors (In Russian with English summary).Zh. Obshch. Biol. 29(3):267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basilevich, N. I., Rodin, L. E., and Rozov, N. N. (1970). Untersuchungen der biologischen Produktivität in geographischer Sicht (In Russian), 5.Tagung Geog. Gessell. USSR (Leningrad).

  • Bowen, H. J. M. (1966).Trace Elements in Biochemistry, Academic Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R. (1960). The chlorophyll content of some native and managed plant communities in central Minnesota.Can. J. Bot. 38:313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R. (1962). The primary productivity of vegetation in central Minnesota/USA and its relationship to chlorophyll content and albedo (German summary). In Lieth, H. (ed.),Die Stoffproduktion der Pflanzendecke, Fischer, Stuttgart, pp. 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R., and Gorham, E. (1964). Litter production in forests of the world.Advan. Ecol. Res. 2:101–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann-Jerosch, H. (1930). Formations Klassen der Erde, Map. In Rübel, E.,Pflanzengesellschaften der Erde, Huber, Bern-Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., and Wuycheck, J. C. (1971). Caloric equivalents for investigations in ecological energetics.Mitt. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 18:1–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusanus, N. (Nicolai de Cusa) (1450).De staticis experimentatis.

  • Dennis, J. G., and Tieszen, L. L. (1971). Primary production and nutrient dynamics of tundra vegetation at Barrow, Alaska. In Bowen, S. (ed.), Preliminary Report of Project 3111, 1971 Progress Report, Tundra Biome US-IBP, Vol. 1, pp. 35–37.

  • DeSelm, H. R. (1971). Tennessee productivity profiles. Eastern Deciduous Forest Biome US-IBP Memo Report No. 71-13.

  • Drozdov, A. V. (1971). The productivity of zonal terrestrial plant communities and the moisture and heat parameters of an area.Soviet Geog. Rev. Transl. 12:54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvigneaud, P. (ed.) (1967).L'Ecologie, Science Moderne de Synthèse, Vol. 2:Écosystèmes et Biosphère, Minist. de l'Education National et Culture, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebermayer, E. W. F. (1882).Naturgesetzliche Grundlagen des Wald- und Ackerbaues. Pt. I:Physiologische Chemie der Pflanzen, Vol. 1:Die Bestandtheile der Pflanzen, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg, H., and Mueller-Dombois, D. (1967). Tentative physiognomic-ecological classification of plant formations of the earth.Ber. Geobot. Inst. Eidg. Techn. Hochschule Stiftung Rübel, Zürich, 1965–69 37:21–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. J. (1971a). Biomass changes in early tropical forest succession.Turriabla 21(1):110–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. J. (1971b). Experiments in arresting succession with cutting and herbicides in five tropical environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 248 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filzer, P. (1951).Die natürlichen Grundlagen des Pflanzenertrages in Mitteleuropa, Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, R. H. (1957). General features of the oceans. In Hedgepeth, J. W. (ed.),Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology, Vol. 2:Ecology, Geological Society of America, Memoirs 67(1), New York, pp. 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogg, G. E. (1958). Actual and potential yields in photosynthesis.Advan. Sci. 14:359–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsen, E. K. (1960). Chlorophyllkonzentration und Photosynthese.Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie, Vol. 2, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gessner, F. (1959).Hydrobotanik, Vol. 2, Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyger, E. (1964). Methodische Untersuchungen zur Erfassung der assimilierenden Gesamtoberflächen von Wiesen.Ber. Geobot. Inst. Eidg. Techn. Hochschule, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich, 1963 35:41–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley, F. B. (1972). Energy flux in ecosystems. In Wiens, J. A. (ed.),Ecosystem Structure and Function, Oregon State University, Corvallis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C. F. (1971a). Productivity of a tropical forest and its relation to a world pattern of energy storage.J. Ecol. 59:127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C. F. (1971b). A world pattern of plant energetics.Sci. Am. 59:425–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junge, C. E., and Czeplak, G. (1968). Some aspects of the seasonal variation of carbon dioxide and ozone.Tellus 20:422–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kira, T., and Ogawa, H. (1971). Assessment of primary production in tropical and equatorial forests (French summary). In Duvigneaud, P. (ed.),Productivity of Forest Ecosystems: Proceedings of the Brussels Symposium 1969, Ecology and Conservation 4, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreh, R. (1965). Untersuchungen über den Aufbau und die Stoffproduktion eines Sonnenblumenbestandes. Doctoral thesis, Landwirtschftliche Hochschule Stuttgart Hohenheim, 71 pp. with table volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1956). Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Korrelation zwischen mittleren Klimawerten und Vegetationsformationen.Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesell. 69:169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1961). La produccion de sustancia organica por la capa vegetal terrestre y sus problemas.Acta Cien. Venezolana 12:107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1962).Die Stoffproduktion der Pflanzendecke, Fischer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1963). The role of vegetation in the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere.J. Geophys. Res. 68(13):3887–3898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1964). Versuch einer kartographischen Darstellung der Produktivität der Pflanzendecke auf der Erde. InGeographisches Taschenbuch 1964/65, Steiner, Wiesbaden, pp. 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1965a). Oekologische Fragestellungen bei der Untersuchung der biologischen Stoffproduktion.Qualitas Plantarum et Materiae Vegetabiles 12:241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1965b). Indirect methods of measurement of dry matter production (French summary). InMethodology of Plant Eco-physiology: Proceedings of the Montpellier Symposium 1962, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1968). The determination of plant dry matter production with special emphasis on the underground parts (French summary). In Eckardt, F. E. (ed.),Functioning of Terrestrial Ecosystmes at the Primary Production Level: Proceedings of the Copenhagen Symposium 1965, Natural Resources Research 5, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1971). Mathematical modeling for ecosystems analysis (French summary). In Duvigneaud, P. (ed.),Productivity of Forest Ecosystems: Proceedings of the Brussels Symposium 1969, Ecology and Conservation 4, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (1972). Über die Primärproduktion der Pflanzendecke der Erde.Z. Angew. Bot. 46:1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. (in press). Primary productivity of successional stages. In Tüxen, R. (ed.),Handbuch der Vegetationskunde. Junk, The Hague.

  • Lieth, H., and Pflanz, B. (1968). The measurement of calorific values of biological material and the determination of ecological efficiency (French summary). In Eckardt, F. E. (ed.),Functioning of Terrestrial Ecosystems at the Primary Production Level: Proceedings of the Copenhagen Symposium 1965, Natural Resources Research 5, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H., and Zauner, F. (1957). Vegetationsformationen und mittlere Klimadaten.Flora 144:290–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H., Osswald, D., and Martens, H. (1965). Stoffproduktion, Spross/Wurzel-Verhältnis, Chlorophyllgehalt and Blattfläche von Jungpappeln,Mitt. Vereins Forstliche Standortskunde und Forstpflanzenzüchtung 1965:70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lossaint, P., and Rapp, M. (1971). Répartition de la matière organique, productivité des èlèments minèraux dans des écosystèmes de climat méditerráneen (English summary). In Duvigneaud, P. (ed.),Productivity of Forest Ecosystems: Proceedings of the Brussels Symposium 1969, Ecology and Conservation 4, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 597–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, H. J. (1964). Untersuchungen über den Blattflächenindex und die Methoden zu seiner Messung. Thesis, Stuttgart University, 51 pp.

  • Medina, E. (1970). Estudios eco-fisiologicos de la vegetation tropical.Bol. Soc. Venezolana den. Nat. 29(2):63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, E., and Lieth, H. (1963). Contenido de clorofila de algunas asociaciones vegetales de Europa Central y su relacion con la productividad.Qualitas Plantarum et Materiae Vegetabiles 9:219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, E., and Lieth, H. (1964). Die Beziehungen zwischen Chlorophyllgehalt, assimilierender Flache und Trockensubstanzproduktion in einigen Pflanzengemeinschaften.Beitr. Biol Pflanzen 40:451–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, E., and San Jose, J. J. (1970). Analisis de la productividad de cana de azucar. II.Turrialba 20:149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitscherlich, E. A. (1954).Bodenkunde für Landwirte, Forstwirte und Gärtner, 7th ed., Parey, Berlin and Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, D. (1960). Kreislauf des Kohlenstoffs.Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie, Vol. 12/2, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 934–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, J. (1971). Doctoral thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddack, W. (1937). Der Kohlenstoff im Haushalt der Natur.Angew. Chem. 50:271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddack, W., and Komor, J. (1937). Uber die Ausnutzung des Sonnenlichtes beim Wachstum der grünen Pflanzen unter natürlichen Bedingungen.Angew. Chem. 50:271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1971).Fundamentals of Ecology, 3rd ed., Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T., McConnell, W., and Abbot, W. (1959). The chlorophyll “A” of communities.Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Univ. Texas 5:65–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S. (1963). Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems.Ecology 44:322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S. (1970). Geographic index of world ecosystems. In Reichle, D. (ed.),Analysis of Temperate Forest Ecosystems, Springer, New York, pp. 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflanz, B. (1964). Der Energiegehalt und die ökologische Energieausbeute verschiedener Pflanzen und Pflanzenbestäunde. Thesis, Stuttgart University, 42 pp.

  • Rabinovitch, E. (1971). An unfolding discovery.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 68:2875–2876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, R. (1971). Net primary productivity and peat accumulation in Southeastern Manitoba. Master's thesis, University of Manitoba, 220 pp.

  • Reichle, D. (ed.) (1970).Analysis of Temperate Forest Ecosystems, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, G. A. (1944). The carbon metabolism and photosynthetic efficiency of the earth as a whole.Sci Am. 32:129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, L. E., and Bazilevich, N. I. (1966).Production and Mineral Cycling in Terrestrial Vegetation, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryther, J. H. (1959). Potential productivity of the sea.Science 130:602–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryther, J. H. (1963). Geographic variations in productivity. In Hill, M. N. (ed.),The Sea, Vol. 2, Interscience, London, pp. 347–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, H. (1919). Die jährliche Gesamtproduktion der grünen Pflanzendecke der Erde.Naturwissenschaften 7:8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, G. (1962). Blattfläche und Assimilationsleistung in Beziehung zur Stoffproduktion. Untersuchungen an Zuckerrüben.Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Gesell. 75:261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, F., Kobriger, N., Cottam, G., and Howell, E. (1971). Productivity profile of Wisconsin. Eastern Deciduous Forest Biome US-IBP Memo Report No. 71-14.

  • Steemann Nielsen, E. (1954). On organic production in the oceans.J. Conseil Permanante Internat. Exploration de Mer (Paris) 19:309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steemann Nielsen, E., and Aabye Jensen, E. (1957). Primary oceanic production. The autotrophic production of organic matter in the oceans.Galathea Rep. 1:49–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup, H. U. (1955). The place of physical oceanography in oceanographic research.J. Mar. Res. 14:287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • SYMAP. Reference Manual for Synagraphic Computer Mapping. Harvard Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Trewartha, G. T. (1954).An Introduction to Climate, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vareschi, V. (1953). Sobre las superficies de asimilacion de sociedades vegetales de cordilleras tropicales y extratropicales.Bol. Soc. Venezolana Cien. Nat. 14:121–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Liebig, J. (1840).Organic Chemistry and Its Applications to Agriculture and Physiology, English ed., L. Playfair and W. Gregory, Taylor & Walton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Liebig, J. (1862).Die Naturgesetze des Feldbaues, Vieweg, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H. (1939). Grasland, Savanne und Busch der ariden Teile Afrikas in ihrer ökologschen Bedingtheit.Jahrbücher Wissenschaft. Bot. 87:750–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H. (1964).Die Vegetation der Erde in ökologischer Betrachtung, Vol. 1:Die tropischen und subtropischen Zonen, Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H. (1968).Die Vegetation der Erde in ökologischer Betrachtung, Vol. 2:Die gemässigten und arktischen Zonen, Fisher, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H., and Lieth, H. (1960–1967).Klimadiagramm-Weltatlas, Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C., and Lieth, H. (1970). Preliminary assessment of the productivity of aPinus taeda plantation in the Piedmont of North Carolina. Report to the Deciduous Forest Biome Headquarters, 4 pp.

  • Whigham, D., Lieth, H., Noggle, R., and Gross, D. (1971). Productivity profile of North Carolina; preliminary results. Eastern Deciduous Forest Biome US-IBP Memo Report No. 71-9.

  • Whittaker, R. H. (1962). Classification of natural communities.Bot Rev. 28:1–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. (1966). Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains.Ecology 47:103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. (1970).Communities and Ecosystems, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., and Woodwell, G. M. (1971). Measurement of net primary production of forests (French summary). In Duvigneaud, P. (ed.),Productivity of Forest Ecosystems: Proceedings of the Brussels Symposium 1969, Ecology and Conservation 4, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. E. (ed.) (1968).Symposium on Primary Productivity and Mineral Cycling in Natural Ecosystems, University of Maine Press, Orono.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. E. (ed.) (1971). Biomass sampling methods for puckerbursh stands. InForest Biomass Studies, International Union of Forest Reseach Organizations Conference, Section 25, Gainesville, Fla.; Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station, University of Maine, Orono.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author's experimental work on primary productivity and seasonal modeling is sponsored by the Deciduous Forest Biome Project, International Biological Program, funded by the National Science Foundation under Interagency Agreement AG-199, 40-193-69 with the Atomic Energy Commission — Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lieth, H. Primary production: Terrestrial ecosystems. Hum Ecol 1, 303–332 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536729

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536729

Keywords

Navigation