Skip to main content
Log in

The Borda dictionary

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forn candidates, a profile of voters defines a unique Borda election ranking for each of the 2n − (n + 1) subsets of two or more candidates. The Borda Dictionary is the set of all of these election listings that occur for any choice of a profile. As such, the dictionary contains all positive features, all flaws, and all paradoxes that can occur with single profile, sincere Borda elections. After the Borda Dictionary is characterized, it is used to show in what ways the Borda Count (BC) is an improvement over other positional voting methods and to derive several new BC properties. These properties include several new characterizations of the BC expressed in terms of axiomatic representations of social choice functions, as well as showing, for example, that the BC ranking ofn candidates can be uniquely determined by the BC rankings of all sets ofk <n candidates for any choice ofk between 2 andn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrow KJ (1952) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brams S, Fishburn P (1983) Paradoxes of preferential voting. Math Mag 56: 207–214

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fishburn P, Gehrlein W (1976) Borda's rule, positional voting, and Condorcet's simple majority principle. Public Choice 28: 79–88

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haunsperger D (1991). PhD dissertation, Northwestern University, Department of Mathematics

  5. Nurmi H (1987) Comparing voting systems. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saari DG (1982) Inconsistencies of weighted summation voting systems. Math Oper Res 7:479–490

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saari DG (1984)The ultimate of chaos resulting from weighted voting systems. Adv Appl Math 5:286–308

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saari, DG (1987) Chaos and the theory of elections. In: Kurzhanski AB, Sigmund K (eds) Dynamical systems. (Lect Notes Econ Math Systems, vol 287) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 179–188

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saari DG (1988) Symmetry, voting, and social choice. Math. Intell 10: (No 3):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saari DG (1989a) A dictionary for voting paradoxes. J Econ Theory 48:443–475

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saari DG (1989b) Calculus and extensions of Arrow's theorem. J Math Econ

  12. Saari DG (1990a) Susceptibility to manipulation. Public Choice 64: 21–41

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saari DG (1990b) Consistency of decision processes. Ann Oper Res 23: 103–137

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saari DG (1991) Relationship admitting families of candidates. Soc Choice Welfare 8

  15. Smith JH (1973) Aggregation of preferences with variable electorate. Econometrica 41: 1027–1041

    Google Scholar 

  16. Young HP (1974) An axiomatization of Borda's rule. J Econ Theory 9:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  17. Young HP (1975) Social choice scoring functions. SIAM J Appl Math 28:824–838

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Newenhizen J (1988) A geometric investigation of voting techniques: a comparison of approval voting, positional voting techniques and the Borda count. Northwestern University PhD dissertation, 1988

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported, in part, by NSF grants IRI8415348, IRI-8803505 and a Fellowship from the Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saari, D.G. The Borda dictionary. Soc Choice Welfare 7, 279–317 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01376279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01376279

Keywords

Navigation