Skip to main content
Log in

Moral voices, moral selves: About getting it right in moral theory

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baier, A. (1987). Hume: The women's moral theorist? In E. Kittay and D. Meyers (Eds.),Women and moral theory, 37–55. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1986). Sex differences in moral reasoning: Response to Walker's [1984] conclusion that there are none.Child Development 57:511–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. (1990). Feminist second thoughts about free agency.Hypatia 5(3):47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, E. and Gilligan, C. (1990). Unfairness and not listening: Converging themes in Emma Willard girls' development. In C. Gilligan, N. Lyons and T. Hanmer (Eds.),Making connections, 147–161. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. (1980).Friendship, altruism and morality. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. (1986). Iris Murdoch and the domain of the moral.Philosophical Studies 50:343–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. (1988). Gilligan and Kohlberg: Implications for moral theory.Ethics 98(3):472–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, J. (1983). Women's rationality and men's virtues: A critique of gender dualism in Gilligan's theory of moral development.Social Research 50(3):597–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (1990). When is a moral problem not a moral problem? In C. Gilligan, N. Lyons and T. Hanmer (Eds.),Making connections, 88–109. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. and Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities.Psychological Bulletin 94(1):100–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O. and Jackson, K. (1987). Justice, care and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited.Ethics 97:622–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1971).The order of things. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, W. K. (1963).Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1987). Care and context in moral reasoning. In E. Kittay and D. Meyers (Eds.),Women and moral theory, 190–204. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1986). Reply by Carol Gilligan.Signs 11(2):324–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1987a). Moral orientation and moral development. In E. Kittay and D. Meyers (Eds.),Women and moral theory, 19–33. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1987b). Remapping development: The power of divergent data. In C. Farnham (Ed.),The impact of feminist research in the academy, 77–94. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1989). Adolescent development reconsidered. In C. Gilligan et al. (Eds.),Mapping the moral domain, vii–xxxix. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1990). Preface. In C. Gilligan, N. Lyons and T. Hanmer (Eds.),Making connections, 6–29. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. and Wiggins, G. (1988). The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In C. Gilligan et al. (Eds.),Mapping the moral domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., Rogers, A. and Brown, L. (1990). Epilogue. In C. Gilligan and T. Hanmer (Eds.),Making connections, 314–334. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, C. and Maccoby, E. (1986). How different is the “different voice”?Signs 11(2):310–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986).The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwig, J. (1984). Should women think in terms of rights?Ethics 94(3):441–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (1987). Feminism and moral theory. In E. Kittay and D. Meyers (Eds.),Women and moral theory, 111–128. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, L. et al. (1986). OnIn a different voice: An interdisciplinary forum.Signs 11(2):304–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981).The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1982). A reply to Owen Flanagan and some comments on the Puka-Goodpaster exchange.Ethics 92(3):513–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984).The psychology of moral development: Essays on moral development, vol. 2. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (1984).After virtue. 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, I. (1970).The sovereignty of good. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nails, D. (1983). Social-scientific sexism: Gilligan's mismeasure of man.Social Research 50(3):643–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984).Caring. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (1989).Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S. (1989).Maternal thinking. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L. (1990). Conceptions of separation and connection in female adolescents. In C. Gilligan, N. Lyons and T. Hanmer (Eds.),Making connections, 73–87. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990).You just don't understand: Women and men in conversatio. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (1987). Women's morality: Beyond gender differences to a theory of care.Signs 12(4):644–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review.Child Development 55:677–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, S. (1977).The Simone Weil reader. Ed. G. Fanichas. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985).Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990).Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hekman, S. Moral voices, moral selves: About getting it right in moral theory. Hum Stud 16, 143–162 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01318576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01318576

Keywords

Navigation