Skip to main content
Log in

Direct regenerationin vitro and transient GUS expression inMentha xpiperita

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic transformation of peppermint is known to be very difficult essentially because of low efficiency regeneration. A regeneration protocol allowing 51% shooting frequency is proposed. Transient β-glucuronidase expression and adjustment of selection pressure with kanamycin are also reported. The final retained method to attempt peppermint transformation is:Agrobacterium inoculation or biolistic treatment of the first apical leaves ofin vitro clones, regeneration in the dark with kanamycin (1 mg l−1) and 6-benzylaminopurine (2 mg l−1), followed by selection of regenerated shoots with 200 mg 1−1 kanamycin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

6-benzylaminopurine

GUS:

β-glucuronidase

MS:

Murashige and Skoog (1962)

NAA:

α-naphthalenacetic acid

PIG:

particle inflow gun

SEM:

scanning electron microscope

References

  • Clark RJ, Menary RC (1984) J Sci Food Agric 35: 1191–1195

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby SM, Alonso WR, Katahira EJ, McGarvey DJ, Croteau R (1993) J Biol Chem 268: 23016–23024

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constabel F (1990) Planta Med 56: 421–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croteau R, Karp F, Wagschal KC, Satterwhite DM, Hyatt D, Skotland CB (1991) Plant Physiol 96: 744–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Deblaere R, Bytebier B, De Greve H, Deboeck F, Schell J, Van Montagu M, Leemans J (1985) Nucl Acids Res 13: 4777–4788

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ, Vain P, Jones MW, McMullen MD (1992) Plant Cell Rep 11: 323–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilly G, Garnero J, Racine P (1986) Parfums, Cosmétiques, Arômes 71: 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA (1983) Nature 303: 179–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Plant Mol Biol Rep 5: 387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Koncz C, Schell J (1986) Mol Gen Genet 204: 383–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Theor Applied Genet 60: 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit A, Tempé J (1978) Mol Gen Genet 167: 147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DD (1981) Plant Disease 65: 322–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato H, Enomoto S, Oka S, Hosomi K, Ito Y (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12: 546–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer A, Hamill JD, Rhodes MJC (1990) Plant Cell Rep 8: 601–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer A, Hamill JD, Rhodes MJC (1993) In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 22, Plant Protoplasts and Genetic Engineering (III). Springer, Berlin, pp 278–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L, Rocha-Sosa M (1990) Mol Gen Genet 220: 245–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck JM, Kitto SL (1990) HortScience 25: 804–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck JM, Kitto SL (1992) Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 30: 41–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caissard, J.C., Faure, O., Jullien, F. et al. Direct regenerationin vitro and transient GUS expression inMentha xpiperita . Plant Cell Reports 16, 67–70 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275452

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275452

Keywords

Navigation