Skip to main content
Log in

Sphincterfunktion nach coloanaler Anastomose

Sphincter function after coloanal anastomosis

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of coloanal anastomosis (CAA) on the function of the anal sphincters was assessed in 27 cases by interview, sphincter manometry and a retention test. During an observation period of 3–12 months after closure of colostomy, the percentage of patients with perfect continence increased from 50 to 80%, of those with solid stool consistency from 30 to 90% and of those with solid stool consisteny from 30 to 90% and of those with less than 5 b.o./day from 30 to 80%. The operation resulted in a significant reduction of the length of the anal canal from 4.0 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.2 cm (P < 0.001) and a significant reduction of the resting tone from 85.5 ± 7.9 to 30.3 ± 6.1 cm H2O (P < 0.001). The contraction pressure was hardly influenced, the recto-anal inhibition reflex was temporarily lost. Minute preoperative assessment of a normal sphincter function with anal manometry is an essential prerequisite for the evaluation of the indication for a CAA.

Zusammenfassung

Die Sphincterfunktion nach coloanaler Anastomose wurde in 27 Fällen durch Kontinenzanamnese, Sphinctermanometrie und Retentionstest untersucht. In einem Beobachtungszeitraum von 3 bis 12 Monaten nach dem Colostomieverschluß stieg der Anteil von Patienten mit vollständiger Kontinenz von 50 auf 80%, von jenen mit fester Stuhlkonsistenz von 30 auf 90% und von jenen mit weniger als 5 Defäkationen/Tag von 30 auf 80%. Die Operation bewirkte eine signifikante Verkürzung des Analkanals von 4,0 ± 0,3 auf 1,7 ± 0,2 cm (p < 0,001) und eine signifikante Reduktion des Ruhedrucks von 85,5 ± 7,9 auf 30,3 ± 6,1 cm H2O (p < 0,001). Der Kontraktionsdruck wurde nicht wesentlich beeinträchtigt, der rectoanale Reflex ging temporär verloren. Wesentliche Voraussetzung zur Indikationsstellung der KAA ist eine durch präoperative Sphincterdiagnostik objektivierte normale Funktion des analen Schließmuskelapparates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Parks AG (1977) Endoanal technique of low colonic anastomosis. Surg Techniques III 2:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG, Percy JP (1982) Resection und sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 69:301–304

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gowers WR (1877) The automatic action of the sphincter ani. Proc R Soc Lond 26:7789

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duthie HL, Bennett RC (1963) The relation of sensation in the anal canal to the function of the anal sphincter: a possible factor in anal continence. Gut 4:179–182

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gross E, Beersiek F, Eigler FW (1980) Sphincterfunktion nach peranalen Anastomosen. Langenbecks Arch Chir 353:207–216

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ritchie JA (1968) Colonic motor activity and bowel function. Part II: Distribution and incidence of motor activity at rest and after food and carbachol. Gut 9:502–511

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wunderlich M, Parks AG (1982) Physiology and pathophysiology of the anal sphincters. Int Surg 67: 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gould RP (1960) Sensory innervation of the anal canal. Nature 187:337–338

    Google Scholar 

  9. Swash M (1982) The neuropathology of idiopathic faecal incontinence. In: Cavanagh NB, Thomas Smith W (Hrsg) Recent advances in neuropathology, vol 2. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 243–271

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gaston EA (1948) Fecal continence following resections of various portions of the rectum with preservation of the anal sphincters. Surg Gynecol Obstet 78:669–678

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goligher JC (1951) The functional results after sphincter-saving resections of the rectum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 8:421–439

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goligher JC, Duthie HL, deDombal FT, Watts JMcK (1965) Abdomino-anal pull-through excision for tumours of the mid-third of the rectum. Br J Surg 52:323–335

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams NS, Price R, Johnston D (1980) The long-term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 67:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gaston EA (1951) Physiological basis for preservation of fecal continence after resection of the rectum. JAMA 146:1486–1489

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keighley MRB, Matheson D (1980) Functional results of rectal excision and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 67:757–761

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lane RHS, Parks AG (1977) Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 64:596–599

    Google Scholar 

  17. Read MG, Read NW, Haynes WG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG (1982) A prospective study of the effect of haemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and faecal continence. Br J Surg 69:396–398

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vellacott KD, Hardcastle JD (1980) Is continued anal dilatation necessary after a Lord's procedure for haemorrhoids? Br J Surg 67:658–659

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bates T (1972) Rectal prolapse after anorectal dilatation in the elderly. Br Med J 2:505

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bennett RC, Duthie HL (1964) The functional importance of the internal anal sphincter. Br J Surg 51:355–357

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffmann DC, Goligher JC (1970) Lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy in treatment of anal fissure. Br Med J 3:673

    Google Scholar 

  22. Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read MG, Santa Ana C, Fordtran JS (1979) A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea. Gastroenterology 76:747–756

    Google Scholar 

  23. Read M, Read WN, Barber DC, Duthie HL (1982) Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency. Dig Dis Sci 27:807–814

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wunderlich, M., Teleky, B. & Schiessel, R. Sphincterfunktion nach coloanaler Anastomose. Langenbecks Arch Chiv 367, 259–269 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263406

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263406

Key words

Navigation