Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms of pollen deposition by insect pollinators

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Studies of pollen dispersal in insect-pollinated plants have often documented highly leptokurtic patterns of pollen deposition that can increase the likelihood of long-distance mating. To examine potential causes of highly leptokurtic deposition, we introduce four functions that arise when (1) the duration of pollinator visits to pollen sources is limited, (2) the rate of pollen deposition varies randomly among pollinators and/or among visits, (3) the rate of pollen deposition changes monotonically over time or (4) pollen is carried in layers or compartments on the pollinator's body that differ in deposition rate. Maximum likelihood techniques were used to fit deposition functions to data obtained from honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) visiting mustard plants (Brassica campestris L.) that contained a marker gene. Each of the alternative leptokurtic functions fit the experimental data better than a simple exponential function and the best-fit function predicted a mean pollen dispersal distance more than three times greater than the exponential. We argue that studies of pollen deposition need to test a broader range of deposition models to assess outcrossing distance in plant populations accurately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. InInternational Symposium on Information Theory (B.N. Petran and F. Csaki, eds), 2nd edn, pp. 267–81. Akademiai iadi, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A.J. (1947) Contamination of seed crops. III. Relation with isolation distance.Heredity 1, 303–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1985) Pollen and gene dispersal: the influences of competition for pollination.Evolution 39, 418–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.R. and Waser, N.M. (1989) Variation in pollen flow within and among populations ofIpomopsis aggregata.Evolution 43, 1444–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, T.J. (1984) What is a population? InEvolutionary ecology. Twenty-third Symposium of the British Ecological Society (B. Shorrocks, ed.), pp. 135–73. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C. and Plowright, R.C. (1984) The effects of nectar level and flower development on pollen carryover in inflorescences of fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) (Onagraceae).Can. J. Bot. 63, 488–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C. and Rotenberry, J.T. (1988) Variance in pollen carryover in animal-pollinated plants: implications for mate choice.J. Theor. Biol. 135, 419–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geber, M. (1985) The relationship of plant size to self-pollination inMertensia ciliata.Ecology 66, 762–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvålseth, T.O. (1985) Cautionary note aboutR 2.Am. Stat. 39, 279–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lertzman, K.P. and Gass, C.L. (1983) Alternative models of pollen transfer. InHandbook of experimental pollination biology (C.E. Jones and R.J. Little, eds), pp. 474–89. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D.A. (1984) Inbreeding depression and proximity-dependent crossing success inPhlox drummondii.Evolution 38, 116–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D.A. and Kerster, H.W. (1974) Gene flow in seed plants.Evol. Biol. 7, 139–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D.A. Kerster, H.W. and Niedzlek, M. (1971) Pollinator flight directionality and its effect on pollen flow.Evolution 25, 113–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manasse, R. (1992) Ecological risks of transgenic plants: effects of spatial dispersion on gene flow.Ecol. Appl. 2, 421–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martz, H.F. and Waller, R.A. (1982)Bayesian Reliability Analysis. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W.F. (1993) Predicting the consequences of plant spacing and biased movement for pollen dispersal by honey bees.Ecology 74, 493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W.F., Price, M.V., Waser, N.M., Thomson, J.D., Thomson, B. and Stratton, D.A. (1994) Systematic increase in pollen carryover and its consequences for geitonogamy in plant populations.Oikos, in press.

  • Portnoy, S. and Willson, M.F. (1993) Seed dispersal curves: behavior of the tail of the distribution.Evol. Ecol. 7, 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. and Waser, N. (1979) Pollen dispersal and optimal outcrossing inDelphinium nelsoni.Nature 277, 294–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M.V. and Waser, N.M. (1982) Experimental studies of pollen carryover: hummingbirds andIpomopsis aggregata.Oecologia 54, 353–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A.W. (1992) The relationship between floral display size, pollen carryover and geitonogamy inMyosotis colensoi (Kirk) Macbride (Boraginaceae).Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 46, 333–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M. and Kitagawa, G. (1986)Akaike information criterion statistics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B.A. (1980) Measurement of gene flow inLupinus texensis.Nature 284, 450–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (1985) An estimate of pollen carryover by ants in a natural population ofScleranthus perennis L. (Caryophyllaceae).Oecologia 66, 373–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.D. (1986) Pollen transport and deposition by bumble bees inErythronium: influences of floral nectar and bee grooming.J. Ecol. 74, 329–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.D. and Plowright, R.C. (1980) Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference toDiervilla lonicera.Oecologia 46, 68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.D. and Thomson, B.A. (1989) Dispersal ofErythronium grandiflorum pollen by bumblebees: implications for gene flow and reproductive success.Evolution 43, 657–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.D., Price, M.V., Waser, N.M. and Stratton, D.A. (1986) Comparative studies of pollen and fluorescent dye transport by bumble bees visitingErythronium grandiflorum.Oecologia 69, 561–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N.M. (1988) Comparative pollen and dye transfer by pollinators ofDelphinium nelsonii.Funct. Ecol. 2, 41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N.M. and Price, M.V. (1982) A comparison of pollen and fluorescent dye carry-over by natural pollinators ofIpomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae).Ecology 63, 1168–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N.M. and Price, M.V. (1983) Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of plant-pollinator interaction. InHandbook of experimental pollination biology (C.E. Jones and R.J. Little, eds), pp. 341–59. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N.M. and Price, M.V. (1984) Experimental studies of pollen carryover: effects of floral variability inIpomopsis aggregata.Oecologia 62, 262–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N.M. and Price, M.V. (1989) Optimal outcrossing inIpomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness.Evolution 43, 1097–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. (1989)SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Systat, Inc., Evanston, Il.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1969)Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwillinger, D. (1989)Handbook of Differential Equations. Academic Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, W.F., Mangel, M. & Adler, F.R. Mechanisms of pollen deposition by insect pollinators. Evol Ecol 9, 304–317 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237776

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237776

Keywords

Navigation