Skip to main content
Log in

How do conventions evolve?

  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper argues that, even in the absence of bureaucratic inertia, the transition from one convention to a superior one can be blocked. Because of the self-reinforcing mechanism generated by coordination effects, the economy can be locked-in to an Pareto-inferior convention. In the framework of evolutionary game theory, convention appears to be an evolutionary stable strategy. We show that the endogenous diffusion of a superior convention is possible but requires the presence of some social or cultural differentiation in order that coordination effects can be localized. The social or cultural links provide no information about the structure of the game, but help people to coordinate themselves by providing external points of reference. We construct a model where matching between agents respects a certain localization of interactions related to social or cultural similarity. These results are used to enlighten the surprising success of japanese labor management in US and UK transplants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler P (1989) New Technologies and the American Industry. Mimeo, August, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler P (1991) The “Learning Bureaucracy”: New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. Mimeo School of Business Administration, University of Southern California, Draft 2.2, October

  • Akerlof GA (1980) A Theory of Social Custom, of Which Unemployment May Be One Consequence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 749–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K (1974) The limits of Organization. W. W. Norton & Company

  • Arthur WB (1988) Competing Technologies: An Overview. In: Dosi R et al. (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp 590–607. Pinter Publishers

  • Aumann RJ (1988) Preliminary Notes on Irrationality in Game Theory. Mimeo Stanford University

  • Boyer R, Orléan A (1991), Les transformations des conventions salariales entre théorie et histoire. D'Henry Ford au fordisme. Revue Economique 42: 233–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford VP, Haller H (1990) Learning how to Cooperate: Optimal play in a Repeated Coordination Games. Econometrica 58: 571–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David P (1985) Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75: 332–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit (1991) Inside Nissan's Sunderland Plant. European Business (August): 79–97.

  • Fallows J (1989) More Like Us. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fucini JJ, Fucini S (1990) Working for the Japanese. The Free Press, Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal S, Janssen M (1991) Can we Learn to Coordinate? Mimeo Erasmus University, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1978) Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83: 1420–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones SRG (1984) The Economics of Conformism. Basil Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler J (1986) Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking. American Economic Review 76: 728–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike K, Inoki T (1990) Skill formation in Japan and southeast Asia. University of Tokyo Press

  • Leibenstein H (1982) The Prisoners' Dilemma and the Invisible Hand: An Analysis of Intrafirm Productivity. American Economic Review 72: 92–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DK (1969) Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The Logic of Animal conflict. Nature 246: 15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (1991) The new institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud B (1991) Les règles d'équité dans la formation des salaires: des études expérimentales aux formalisations économiques. Miméo, CEPREMAP, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter A (1981) The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R (1986) The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare. Basil Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers LH (1988) Relative Wages, Efficiency Wages, and Keynesian Unemployment. American Economic Review 78: 383–388

    Google Scholar 

  • The Institute of Social Science (1990) Local Production of Japanese Automobile and Electronics Firms in the United States: The “Application” and “Adaptation” of Japanese Style Management”. Research Report no 23, March. University of Tokyo

  • Walliser B (1989) Théorie des jeux et genèse des institutions. Recherches Economiques de Louvain 55: 339–364

    Google Scholar 

  • White M, Trevor M (1983) Under Japanese Management: The Experience of British Workers. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyer, R., Orléan, A. How do conventions evolve?. J Evol Econ 2, 165–177 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202416

Key words

Navigation