Skip to main content
Log in

Upgrading automation for nuclear fuel in-core management: From the symbolic generation of configurations, to the neural adaptation of heuristics

  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

FUELCON is an expert system in nuclear engineering. Its task is optimized refueling-design, which is crucial to keep down operation costs at a plant. FUELCON proposes sets of alternative configurations of fuel-allocation; the fuel is positioned in a grid representing the core of a reactor. The practitioner of in-core fuel management uses FUELCON to generate a reasonably good configuration for the situation at hand. The domain expert, on the other hand, resorts to the system to test heuristics and discover new ones, for the task described above. Expert use involves a manual phase of revising the ruleset, based on performance during previous iterations in the same session. This paper is concerned with a new phase: the design of a neural component to carry out the revision automatically. Such an automated revision considers previous performance of the system and uses it for adaptation and learning better rules. The neural component is based on a particular schema for a symbolic to recurrent-analogue bridge, called NIPPL, and on the reinforcement learning of neural networks for the adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galperin, A.; Kimhi, Y.; Nissan, E. (1993). FUELCON: an expert system for assisting the practice and research of in-core fuel management and optimal design in nuclear engineering, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 12, 369–415

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kimhi, Y. (1992) A non-algorithmic approach to the in-core fuel management problem of a PWR core, PhD dissertation, Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (Beer-Sheva, Israel) (in Hebrew; English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galperin, A.; Kimhi, Y. (1991) Application of knowledge-based methods to in-core fuel management. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 109, 103–110

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galperin, A.; Yimhi, Y.; Segev, M. (1989) A knowledge-based system for optimization of fuel reload configurations, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 102, 43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galperin, A.; Nissan, E. (1988) Application of a heuristic search method for generation of fuel reload configurations, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 99 (4), 343–352

    Google Scholar 

  6. Siegelmann, H.T. (1994) Neural programming language, Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, Washington.

  7. Cochran, R.G.; Tsoulfanidis, N. (1990) The Nuclear Reactor Cycle: Analysis and Management, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parks, G.T.; Lewins, J.D. (1992) In-core fuel management and optimization: the state of the art, Nuclear Europe Worldscan, 12 (3/4), 41

    Google Scholar 

  9. Petschhat, G.R.; Rothleder, B.M.; Faught, W.S.; Eich, W.J. (1986) Interactive fuel shuffle assistant graphics interface and automation for nuclear fuel shuffle with PDQ7, Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society Topical Meeting on Advances in Fuel Management, Pinehurst, NC

  10. Faught, W.S. (1987) Prototype fuel shuffling system using a knowledge-based toolkit, Technical Report, IntelliCorp, Mountain View, CA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rothleder, B.M.; Petschhat, G.R.; Faught, W.S.; Eich, W.J. (1988) The potential for expert system support in solving the Pressurized Water Reactor fuel shuffling problem, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 100, 400

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kropaczek, D.J.; Turinski, P.J. (1991) In-core nuclear fuel optimization for Pressurized Water Reactors using simulated annealing. Nuclear Technology, 95, 9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sontag, E.D. (1992) Neural nets as systems models and controllers, Proceedings of the Seventh Yale Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Systems, Yale University, New Haven, CN, pp. 73–79

  14. Matthews, M. (1992) On the uniform approximation of nonlinear discrete-time fading-memory systems using neural network models, PhD dissertation, ETH No. 9635, E.T.H., Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  15. Polycarpou, M.M.; Ioannou, P.A. (1991) Identification and control of nonlinear systems using neural network models: design and stability analysis, Report 91-09-01, Department of EE/Systems, University of South California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cleeremans, A.; Servan-Schreiber, D.; McClelland, J. (1989) Finite state automata and simple recurrent networks, Neural Computation, 1, 372

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elman, J. L. (1990) Finding structure in time, Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giles, C.L.; Miller, C.B.; Chen, D.; Chen, H.H.; Sun, G.Z.; Lee, Y.C. (1992) Learning and extracting finite state automata with second-order recurrent neural networks,Neural Computation, 4 (3), 393–405

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pollack, J.B. (1990) The induction of dynamical recognizers, Report 90-JP-Automata, Department of Computer and Information Science, Ohio State University

  20. Williams, R.J.; Zipser, D. (1989) A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks, Neural Computation, 1, 270–280

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barto, A. G.; Singh, S. P. (1990) On the computational economics of reinforcement learning, Proceedings of the 1990 Connectionist Models Summer School, D. S. Touretzky, J. L. Elman, T. I. Sejnowski, and G. E. Hinton (Editors), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Narendra, K.; Thathacar, M. A. L. (1989)Learning Automata: An Introduction, Prentice-Hallm, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barto, A. G.; Anandan, P. (1985) Pattern recognizing stochastic learning Aatomata,IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics,15, 360–375

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barto, A.G.; Jordan, M.I. (1987) Gradient following without back-propagation in layered networks, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, Vol. 2, pp. 629–636

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hertz, J.; Krogh, A.; Palmer, R.G. (1991) Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barto, A.G.; Sutton, R.S.; Watkins, C.J.C.H. (1991) Learning and sequential decision making, In Learning and Computational Neuroscience, M. Gabriel and J.W. Moore (Editors), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jordan, M.I. (1992) Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher, Cognitive Science, 16, 307–354

    Google Scholar 

  28. Siegelmann, H.T. (1993) Foundations of recurrent neural networks, PhD Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gallant, S.I. (1988) Connectionist expert systems, Communications of the ACM, 31 (2), 152–169

    Google Scholar 

  30. Medsker, L.R. Editor (1991) The Synergism of Expert System and Neural Network Technologies, special issue of Expert Systems with Applications, 2 (1)

  31. Medsker, L.R. (1994) Hybrid Neural Network and Expert Systems, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bhogal, A.S.; Seviora, R.E.; Elmasry, M.I. (1991) Towards connectionist expert systems, Expert Systems with Applications, 2 (1), 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  33. Silverman, B.G. (1992) Survey of expert critiquing systems: practical and theoretical frontiers, Communications of the ACM, 35 (4), 106–127

    Google Scholar 

  34. Towell, G.G.; Shavlik, J.; Noordewier, M.O. (1990) Refinement of approximately correct domain theories by knowledge-based neural networks, Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificaial Intelligence, p. 861

  35. Maclin, R.; Shavlik, J.W. Incorporating advice into agents that learn from reinforcement (journal submission)

  36. Nissan, E.; Siegelmann, H.; Galperin, A.; Kimhi, S. (1994) Towards full automation of the discovery of heuristics in a nuclear engineering project, by combining symbolic and subsymbolic Computation, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS'94), Charlotte, N.C., Springer-Verlag, New York (Lecture Noter in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 869), pp. 427–436

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nissan, E.; Siegelmann, H.; Galperin, A. (1994) An integrated symbolic and neural network architecture for machine learning in the domain of nuclear engineering, Proceedings of the Conference on Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, within the 12th ICPR: International Conferences on Pattern Recognition, Jerusalem, IEEE, Computer Society Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Galperin, A.; Kimhi, S.; Nissan, E.; Siegelmann, H.; Zhao, J. (1995)Symbolic and subsymbolic integration in prediction and rule-revision tasks for fuel allocation in nuclear reactors. Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT'95), Aachen, Germany, (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ephraim Nissan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nissan, E., Siegelmann, H., Galperin, A. et al. Upgrading automation for nuclear fuel in-core management: From the symbolic generation of configurations, to the neural adaptation of heuristics. Engineering with Computers 13, 1–19 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201857

Keywords

Navigation