Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of shot peening on the fatigue and fracture behaviour of two titanium alloys

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fatigue and fracture behaviour of two titanium alloys, the near-alpha IMI-685 and alpha-beta IMI-318, were studied in the machined and polished (MP) as well as the machined, polished and shot (glass-bead) peened (MPS) conditions. Glass-bead peening reduced the room-temperature as well as the high-temperature (450°C) fatigue life of alloy IMI-685 at high stress amplitudes, σa, approaching the proof stress, σps, of the material (LCF region). When the applied stress amplitude (0–770 MPa, HCF region) was comparable to the peen-induced peak longitudinal residual stress, σLP, i.e. (σLP/σa)=0.92, an improvement in the room-temperature fatigue life of IMI-685 was observed. When the (σLP/σa) ratio was less than this value, decreases in the fatigue life were seen. The room-temperature fatigue behaviour of IMI-318 at high stress amplitudes was similar to that of IMI-685. The decrease in the fatigue life of this alloy, at a stress amplitude (770 MPa) where improvement was observed for IMI-685, could be attributed to the higher relaxation of peen-induced residual stresses in IMI-318 compared with IMI-685. Glass-bead peening improved the hightemperature (450°C) fatigue life of IMI-685 at a low stress amplitude (465 MPa; (σa/σPS)=0.87). The crack-initiation sites in the MP and the MPS conditions were at the surface for both the alloys. However, fracture in the surface layers of the alloys appeared more brittle in the peened (MPS) rather than in the unpeened (MP) condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. R. Sridhar, W. G. Nafde andK. A. Padmanabhan J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 5783.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. E. Deiter, “Mechanical Metallurgy” (McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1986) p. 392.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. R. Sridhar, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. T. K. Assadi, H. M. Flower andD. R. F. West,Metals Technol. 6 (1979) 8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Krishna Mohana Rao andC. Ramachandra, personal communication (1992).

  6. P. Rama Rao, personal communication (1992).

  7. M. N. Stepnov, M. G. Veitsman, E. V. Giatsinou, L. V. Agamisou andL. N. Guskova,Probl. Prochn. 3 (1985) 20–23; cited inMet. Abs. (31–339) Vol. 18, October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. O'Hara, in “Impact Surface Treatment”, Second International Conference on Impact Treatment Processes, edited by S. A. Meguid (Eisevier Applied Science, London, New York, 1986) pp. 115–26.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Hirsch, O. Vohringer andE. Macherauch, in “Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shot Peening” (ICSP-2, Chicago, IL), edited by H.O. Fuchs (American Shot Peening Society, NJ, 1984), pp. 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Skalli andJ. F. Flavnot,Journees Int. Pring. S. F. M. (1984) pp. 98–117, cited in “Impact Surface Treatment”, Second International Conference on Impact Treatment Processes, edited by S. A. Meguid (Elsevier Applied Science, London, New York, 1986) pp. 45–56.

  11. S. Kondama, in “Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Behaviour of Materials”, Kyoto, Vol. 2 (1971) pp. 111–118, cited in “Impact Surface Treatment”, Second International Conference on Impact Treatment Processes, edited by S. A. Meguid (Elsevier Applied Science, London, New York, 1986) pp. 45–56.

  12. M. Desvignes, B. Gentil andL. Castex, in “Impact Surface Treatment”, Second International Conference on Impact Treatment Processes, edited by S. A. Meguid (Elsevier Applied Science, London, New York, 1986) pp. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Bergstrom andT. Ericsson, in “Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shot Peening” (ICSP-2, Chicago, IL), edited by H. O. Fuchs (American Shot Peening Society, NJ, 1984), pp. 241–18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Bergstrom, “Advances in Surface Treatment Technology Applications”, Vol. 3, “Effects” (Pergamon Press, London, 1986) pp. 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Q. Qiu, X. Li, andR. Wang, in “Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Materials”, Vol. II (Conference Proceedings, China, October 1985) pp. 733–40, cited inMet. Abs. (31-4854) Vol. 20, November 1987, p. 48.

  16. M. Tiktinsky, in “The Science, Technology and Applications of Titanium”, edited by R. I. Jaffee and N. V. Promisel (Pergamon Press, London, 1970) p. 1013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. S. Was andR. M. Pelloux,Metall. Trans. 10A (1978) 1339.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Margolin, M. A. Greenfield andI. Greenhut, in “Titanium science and Technology”, Vol. 3 (Conference Proceedings), edited by R. I. Jaffee and H. M. Burte (Plenum Press, New York, London, 1973) p. 1709.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Eylon, J. A. Hall, C. M. Pierce andD. L. Ruckle,Metall. Trans. 7A (1976) 1817.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Marrisen, M. Peters, K. Schulte, K. H. Trautman andH. Nowack, in “Titanium Science and Technology”, Vol. 4, Fifth International Conference on Titanium, edited by G. Luetjering, W. Zwicker and W. Bunk (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Metallkunde, Oberursel, 1984) pp. 2289–96.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Marrisen, M. Peters, K. Schulte, K. H. Trautman andK. Mull, Deutsche Forchungs Versuchsanstalt Luft Raumfahrt (FRG) N87-11885/7/GAR, May 1986, p. 42, cited inMet. Abs. (31-3978) Vol. 20, September 1987, p. 62.

  22. L. F. Impellizzeri, “Cumulative Damage Analysis in Structural Fatigue”, Effects of Environment and Complex Load History on Fatigue Life, ASTM Special Technical Publication 462 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1970) pp. 40–68.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Gillespe, “Titanium-1986, Products and Applications”, Vol. I, Proceedings of the Technical Programme from 1986 International Conference (Titanium Development Association, Dayton, USA, 1987), pp. 154–64.

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. J. Erdeman andR. D. Radcliffe, Effects of Shot Peening on the Cyclic Behaviour of Thermally Exposed and Non-thermally Exposed Titanium Alloys, in “Canadian Materials and Processing Technology Conference and Exposition”, September 1969.

  25. Titanium Alloy IMI-685, Technical Data bulletin from Imperial Metal Industries (Birmingham, UK, 1983).

  26. O. Vohringer, T. Hirsch andE. Macherauch, in “Titanium Science and Technology”, Vol. 4, Fifth International Conference on Titanium, edited by G. Luetjering, W. Zwicker and W. Bunk (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Metallkunde, Oberursel, 1984) pp. 2203–10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Gerdes andG. Luetjering, in “Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shot Peening” (ICSP-2, Chicago, IL), edited by H. O. Fuchs (American Shot Peening Society, NJ, 1984) pp. 175–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Wagner andG. Luetjering, in “First International Conference on Shot Peening”, edited by Nicku-Lari (Pergamon Press, New York, 1981) p. 453.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Idem, in “Second International Conference on Shot Peening (ICSP-2, Chicago, IL), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shot Peening” (ICSP-2), edited by H. O. Fuchs (American Shot Peening Society, NJ, 1984) pp. 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Idem, ibid, pp. 201–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Titanium Alloy IMI-318, Technical Data Bulletin from Imperial Industries, (Birmingham, UK, 1971).

  32. P. Lehr, in “Titanium Science and Technology”, Vol. 3, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Titanium, edited by H. Kimura and O. Izumi (Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1980) p. 1617.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sridhar, B.R., Ramachandra, K. & Padmanabhan, K.A. Effect of shot peening on the fatigue and fracture behaviour of two titanium alloys. J Mater Sci 31, 5953–5960 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01152145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01152145

Keywords

Navigation