Skip to main content
Log in

The productivity effects of the liberalization of Japanese telecommunication policy

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the early 1980s, the Japanese government decided to pursue policies of liberalization that opened Japan's telecommunication market to competition and moved toward the privatization of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT), the dominant domestic telecommunication service provider. The purpose of this paper is to assess the effects of liberalization on the productive performance of NTT. To assess the productive consequences of liberalization, we first provide basic productivity measures for NTT. The Total Factor Productivity (TFP) measures are then decomposed to separate out the effects of liberalization from other factors such as scale, technology, and capacity utilization. The TFP decomposition is based on the parameter estimates of a dynamic cost model.

During the 1958–87 period, NTT's TFP level increased at an average annual rate of 3.4%. However, TFP improved at a significantly faster rate following the decision to adopt policies of liberalization. The NTT's average annual TFP growth rate was 5.12% for the 1982–87 period as compared to a 0.26% per year growth rate for the previous five year (1977–82) period. The decomposition of TFP growth appears to indicate that liberalization was a major source of productivity improvement for NTT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berndt, E.R. and M.A. Fuss. (1986). Productivity Measurement with Adjustments for Variations in Capacity Utilization and Other Forms of Temporary Equilibrium.Journal of Econometrics vol. 33, pp. 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M. and J. Kay. (1988).Does Privatization Work?: Lessons from the U.K. Centre for Business Strategy Report Series, London Business School, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L.R., and D.W. Jorgenson. (1969). The measurement of U.S. Real Capital Input, 1929–1967.The Review of Income and Wealth, Series 15, 1, pp. 19–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, Robert W. (1989). Efficiency Gains From Divestiture: A Five-Year Assessment. A Brookings Institution paper presented at Columbia University Conference, Washington, D.C. March 2–3, 1989.

  • Denny, M., M. Fuss and L. Waverman. (1981). The Measurement and Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regulated Industries, with an Application to Canadian Telecommunications. In Cowing, T.G. and R.E. Stevenson (eds.)Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industry, Reading, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, M., and L. Waverman. (1985). Productivity Growth in the Automobile Industry, 1970–1980: A Comparison of Canada, Japan and the United States. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Working Paper 1735.

  • Gillen, D.W., T.H. Oum and M.W. Tretheway. (1985).Airline Cost and Performance: Implication for Public and Industry Policies. Centre for Transportation Studies, The University of British Columbia.

  • Hall, R.E., and D.W. Jorgenson. (1967). Tax Policy and Investment Behavior.American Economic Review, 57, pp. 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W., F.M. Gollop and B.M. Fraumeni. (1987). Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C. (1985). Primal and Dual Capacity Utilization: An Application to Productivity Measurement in the U.S. Automobile Industry.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 3, pp. 312–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C. (1986). Productivity Measurement with Nonstatic Expectations and Varying Capacity Utilization: An Integrated Approach.Journal of Econometrics 33, pp. 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, I.M., and M.A. Schankerman. (1981). The Structure of Production, Technological Change, and the Rate of Growth of TFP in the U.S. Bell System. In Cowing and Stevenson (eds),Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industry, Reading, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oum, T.H., and M.W. Tretheway. (1991). A Comparison of Productivity Performance of the Canadian and U.S. Pulp and Paper Industries.Journal of Business Administration vol. 20, 1–2, 212–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oum, T.H., and Y. Zhang. (1993). Competition and Allocative Efficiency: The Case of the U.S. Telephone Industry. Faculty of Commerce Working Paper #93-TRA-004, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R.S. and J.J. Rotemberg. (1983). Dynamic factor demands and effects of energy price shocks.American Economic Review, 73, pp. 1066–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Haramasu and Rodney Stevenson. (1989). Japanese Telecommunication Policy After Privatization and Liberalization.Columbia Journal of World Business, 24, No. 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oniki, H., Oum, T.H., Stevenson, R. et al. The productivity effects of the liberalization of Japanese telecommunication policy. J Prod Anal 5, 63–79 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073598

Keywords

Navigation