Skip to main content
Log in

“Distribution-free” estimates of efficiency in the U.S. banking industry and tests of the standard distributional assumptions

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of efficiency in banking and elsewhere often impose arbitrary assumptions on the distributions of efficiency and random error in order to separate one from the other. In this study, we impose much less structure on these distributions and only assume that efficiencies are stable over time while random error tends to average out. We are able to do so by estimating firm-specific effects on costs using panel data sets of over 28,000 observations on U.S. banks from 1980 to 1989. We find results similar to the literature—X-efficiencies or managerial differences in efficiency are important in banking, while scale-efficiency differences are not. However, we also find that the distributional assumptions usually imposed in the literature are not very consistent with these data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aly, Hassan Y., Richard Grabowski, Carl Pasurka, and Nanda Rangan. (1990). “Technical, Scale, and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S. Banking: An Empirical Investigation.”Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Paul W., Allen N. Berger, and David B. Humphrey. (1993). “Efficiency and Productivity Growth in U.S. Banking.” In H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, and S.S. Schmidt (eds.),The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 386–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen N. (1991). “The Profit-Concentration Relationship in Banking.” Finance and Econmics Discussion Series (FEDS) No. 176, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

  • Berger, Allen N. (1992). “‘Distribution-Free’ Estimates of Efficiency in the U.S. Banking Industry and Tests of the Standard Distributional Assumptions.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS) No. 188, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

  • Berger, Allen N., Diana Hancock, and David Humphrey. (1993). “Bank Efficiency Derived from the Profit Function.”Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 317–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen, N., and Timothy H. Hannan. (1989). “The Price-Concentration Relationship in Banking.”Review of Economics and Statistics 71, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen N., Gerald A. Hanweck, and David B. Humphrey. (1987). “Competitive Viability in Banking: Scale, Scope and Product Mix Economies.”Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 501–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen N., and David B. Humphrey. (1991). “The Dominance of Inefficiencies over Scale and Product Mix Economies in Banking.”Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 117–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen N. and David B. Humphrey. (1992a). “Megamergers in Banking and the Use of Cost Efficiency as an Antitrust Defense.”Antitrust Bulletin 37, 541–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Allen N., and David B. Humphrey. (1992b). “Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking.” In Zvi Griliches (ed.),Output Measurement in the Service Sectors. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press, 245–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,Reports of Condition and Income. Washington, DC, various years.

  • Elyasiani, Elyas, and Seyed M. Mehdian. (1990). “A Non-Parametric Aproach to Measurement of Efficiency and Technological Change: The Case of Large U.S. Commercial Banks.”Journal of Financial Services Research 4, 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evanoff, Douglas D. and Philip R. Israilevich. (1990). “Cost Economies and the Efficiency of Large U.S. Commerical Banks.” Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

  • Evanoff, Douglas D., and Philip R. Israilevich. (1991). “Scale Elasticity and Efficiency for U.S. Banks.” InIssues in Financial Regulation. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

  • Ferrier, Gary D., Shawna Grosskopf, Kathy Hayes, and Suthathip Yaisawarng. (1991). “Economies of Diversification in the Banking Industry: A Frontier Approach.” Working Paper, Southern Methodist University.

  • Ferrier, Gary D., and C. A. Knox Lovell. (1990). “Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking: Econometric and Linear Programming Evidence.”Journal of Econometrics 46, 229–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixler, Dennis J., and Kimberly D. Zieschang. (1991). “Pricing Imputation Problems in Commercial Banking: A Production Function Approach. “Working Paper, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

  • Flannery, Mark J. (1984). “The Social Costs of Unit Banking Restrictions.”Journal of Monetary Economics 13, 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William, H. (1990). “A Gamma Distributed Stochastic Frontier Model.”Journal of Econometrics 46, 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, William C., Stephen G. Timme, and Won Keun Yang. (1990). “An Examination of Cost Subadditivity and Multiproduct Production in Large U.S. Banks.”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 22, 504–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, Harvey. (1996). “Allocative Efficiency vs. ‘X-Efficiency‘.”American Economic Review 56, 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Gordon. (1992). “Merger Boom of 1991 Will Test Wisdom of In-Market Marriages.”American Banker January 14, 1.

  • Noulas, Athanasios G., Subhash C. Ray, and Stephen M. Miller. (1990). “Returns to Scale and Input Substitution for Large U.S. Banks.”Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 22, 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, Nanda, Richard Grabowski, Hassan Aly, and Carl Pasurka. (1988). “The Technical Efficiency of U.S. Banks.”Economics Letters 28, 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Peter, and Robin C. Sickles. (1984). “Production Frontiers and Panel Data.”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timme, Stephen G., and Won Keun Yang. (1991). “On the Use of a Direct Measure of Efficiency in Testing Structure-Performance Relationships.” Working Paper, Georgia State University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, A.N. “Distribution-free” estimates of efficiency in the U.S. banking industry and tests of the standard distributional assumptions. J Prod Anal 4, 261–292 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073413

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073413

Keywords

Navigation