Skip to main content
Log in

Vocal cues to deception: A comparative channel approach

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated the leakage potential of different voice and speech cues using a cue isolation and masking design. Speech samples taken from an earlier experiment were used in which 15 female students of nursing dissimulated negative affect produced by an unpleasant movie or told the truth about positive affect following a pleasant movie. Several groups of judges rated these speech samples in five conditions: (1) forward or clear, (2) electronic filtering, (3) random splicing, (4) backwards, (5) pitch inversion, (6) tone-silence sequences. The results show that vocal cues do indeed carry leakage information and that, as reflected in the differences among the conditions masking different types of cues respectively, voice quality cues may be centrally implicated. In addition, gender differences in decoding ability are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armor, D. J. (1974). Theta reliability and factor scaling. In H. L. Costner (Ed.),Sociological methodology, 1973–1974. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Ambivalence, discrepancy, and deception in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Zuckerman, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1980). Detecting deception: Modality effects. In L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of personality and social psychology: I. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and cues to deception.Psychiatry, 32, 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. F. (1974). Detecting deception from body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., O'Sullivan, M., & Scherer, K. (1980). Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgments of personality and affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. (1976). Body movement and voice pitch in deceptive interaction.Semiotica, 16, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1954).Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1979). Gender, gender-roles, and nonverbal communication skills. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984).Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, J., & Feldstein, S. (1970).Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1980).The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry.American Psychologist, 29, 725–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orne, M. T., Thackray, R. I., & Paskewitz, D. A. (1972). On the detection of deception, In N. S. Greenfield & R. A. Sternback (Eds.),Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 743–785). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1977). Psychological measures and the detection of deception.Psychological Bulletin, 84, 782–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1982). Conducting judgment studies. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. M. (1979). Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1971). Randomized splicing: A note on a simple technique for masking speech content.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1979). Nonlinguistic indicators of emotion and psychopathology. In C. E. Izard (Ed.),Emotions in personality and psychopathology (pp. 495–529). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1981). Vocal indicators of stress: In J. Darby (Ed.),Speech evaluation in psychiatry (pp. 171–187). New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1982). Methods of research on vocal communication: Paradigms and parameters. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 136–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., & Scherer, U. (1982). Nonverbal behavior and impression formation in naturalistic situations. In H. Hiebsch, H. Brandstätter, & H. H. Kelley (Eds.),Proceedings of the XXIInd International Congress of Psychology, Leipzig (GDR), 1980. Social Psychology. Amsterdam: VEB Deutscher Verlag de Wissenschaften Berlin, and North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., Scherer, U., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1977). Differential attribution of personality based on multichannel presentation of verbal and nonverbal cues.Psychological Research, 39, 221–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkweather, J. A. (1956). Content-free speech as a source of information about the speaker.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 394–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, L. A., Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., Olson, C., I Apple, W. (1977). Pitch changes during attempted deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldert-Lauth, M., & Scherer, K. R. (1983). Interpersonale Kommunikation von Machiavellismus: Zur Bedeutung von Kommunikationskanälen und Situationsfaktoren.Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 30, 311–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of decettion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 14). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scherer, K.R., Feldstein, S., Bond, R.N. et al. Vocal cues to deception: A comparative channel approach. J Psycholinguist Res 14, 409–425 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067884

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067884

Keywords

Navigation