Abstract
This paper provides an empirical study of energy taxes for achieving environmental and fiscal policy objectives. Based on an energy tax structured like Clinton's 1993 BTU tax proposal, we demonstrate that the optimal tax will be higher the greater the environmental costs associated with energy consumption and the larger the economic distortions associated with alternative revenue-raising policies. Greater environmental damages and higher revenue-raising costs also have a fiscal policy implication; they shift the least-cost tax mix for raising additional revenue toward energy taxes and away from conventional tax alternatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballard, C.L., D. Fullerton, J.B. Shoven, and J. Whalley. 1985a.General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ballard, C.L., D. Fullerton, J.G. Shoven, and J. Whalley. 1985b. “General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States.”American Economic Review 75(1): 128–138.
Ballard, C.L. and S.G. Medema. 1993. “The Marginal Efficiency Effects of Taxes and Subsidies in the Presence of Externalities: A Computational General Equilibrium Approach.”Journal of Public Economics 52: 199–216.
Barnett, A.J. 1980. “The Pigouvian Tax Rule under Monopoly.”American Economic Review 70: 1037–1041.
Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates. 1988.The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bergman, L. 1993. “General Equilibrium Effects of Environmental Policy: A CGE-modeling Approach.”Environmental and Resource Economics 1: 43–61.
Borgess, A.M. and L.H. Goulder. 1984. “Decomposing the Impact of Higher Energy Prices on Long-term Growth.” InApplied General Equilibrium Analysis, edited by H.E. Scarf and J.B. Shoven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boyd, R. and K. Krutilla. 1992. “Controlling Acid Deposition: A General Equilibrium Assessment.”Environmental and Resource Economics 1: 43–61.
Boyd, R., K. Krutilla, and W. Kip Viscusi. 1994. “Energy Taxation as a Policy Instrument to Reduce CO2 Emissions: A Net Benefit Analysis.” ForthcomingJournal of Environmental Economics and Mangement.
Carlton, Dennis and Glenn Loury. 1980. “The Limitation of Pigouvian Taxes as a Long-Run Remedy for Externalities.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 95(3): 559–566.
Chung, C.K., K. Krutilla, and R. Boyd. 1993. “Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives.” Working Paper, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University.
Hazilla, M. and R. Kopp. 1990. “Social Cost of Environmental Quality Regulations: A General Equilibrium Analysis.”Journal of Political Economy 98: 853–873.
Jorgenson, D.W. and P.J. Wilcoxen. “Reducing U.S. Carbon Emissions: An Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment.”Resource and Energy Economics 15: 7–25.
Jung, C., K. Krutilla, and R.G. Boyd. 1994. “Industry-Level Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, in press.
Krutilla, K. 1991. “Environmental Regulation in an Open Economy.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20: 127–142.
Lee, D.R. 1975. “Efficiency of Pollution Taxation and Market Structure.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2: 69–72.
Lee, D.R. and W.S. Misiolek. 1986. “Substituting Pollution Taxation for General Taxation: Some Implications For Efficiency in Pollution Taxation.”Journal of Economics and Management 12: 338–347.
NAPAP (National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program). 1990. “National Acid Precipitation Program Report to the President and Congress.” Washington D.C.
Pezzey, J. 1992. “Some Interactions between Environmental Policy and Public Finance.” Paper delivered at the 3rd Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Cracow, Poland.
Piggot, J., J. Whalley, and R. Wigle. 1992. “International Linkages and Carbon Reduction Initiatives.” InThe Greening of World Trade Issues, edited by K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
RFF (Resources for the Future). December 1988. “The Health and Agricultural Benefits of Reduction in Ambient Ozone in the United States.”
Shoven J.B. and J. Whalley. 1984. “Applied General Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International Trade: an Introduction and Survey.”Journal of Economic Literature 22: 281–322.
Terkla, D. 1984. “The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11: 107–123.
U.S. EPA. December 1986. “Strategies and Air Standards Division, Regulatory Impact Analysis of the NAAQS for PM, Second Addendum.”
U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation. 1988. “Regulatory Impact Analysis of NAAQS for Sulfur Oxide (Sulfur Dioxide).” Draft Report.
U.S. EPA, Office of Policy Analysis. February 1985. “Cost and Benefits of Reducing Lead in Gasoline, Final RIA.”
U.S. EPA, Office Mobile Sources. 1987. “Air Toxic Emissions from Motor Vehicles.”
Viscusi, W.K. and W.A. Magat, A. Carlin, and M.K. Dreyfus. 1994. “Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing.”The Energy Journal 15: 23–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of two anonymous referees, who provided very helpful feedback. We also wish to acknowledge outstanding research assistance from Tracy Terry of the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University Bloomington. Of course, the results and conclusions of the paper are the authors' exclusively.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krutilla, K., Viscusi, W.K. & Boyd, R. Environmental taxation for environmental regulation and fiscal policy: An analysis of a Clinton-type BTU tax. J Regul Econ 8, 5–22 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066596
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066596