Skip to main content
Log in

Spouse similarities in personality items: Changes over years of marriage and implications for mate selection

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the variation in similarity between spouses in personality, as assessed by selected items of the Comrey Personality Scales (CPS), over 22 years of marriage. The sample consisted of 138 professional couples in Jerusalem. An analysis of 57 CPS items showed mild convergence for five out of the seven Comrey dimensions over the marriage span investigated and divergence for one Comrey dimension. Convergence and divergence were identified as reduction and increase, respectively, in extreme differences between spouses with length of marriage. These findings underline the necessity of considering the actual scattergrams with marriage length when dealing with assortative mating estimates, in addition to calculating correlation coefficients or comparing means over time. A detailed analysis of spouse correlations for Comrey items in the most recently married subgroup suggests possible mate selection for “self-other centeredness.” Implications for such selection are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research.Psychol. Bull. 66:423–437. [Reprinted in Bakan, D. (1966).On Method Toward a Reconstruction of Psychological Investigation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, R. F. (1981). Factor stability of the Comrey Personality Scales.Educ. Psychol. Measure.41:309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1984). Marital assortment for personality dispositions: Assessment with three different data sources.Behav. Genet. 14:111–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection.Am. Sci. 73:47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing.Harvard Educ. Rev. 48:378–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L. (1970).Manual for the Comrey Personality Scales, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowger, Ch. D. (1984). Statistical significance tests: Scientific ritualism or scientific method? InSocial Service Review, University of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckland, B. K. (1968). Theories of mate selection.Eugen. Q. 15:71–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E., and Guttman, R. (1984). Mate selection in man: evidence, theory, and outcome.Soc. Biol. 31:243–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika 10:255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1977). What is not what in statistics.Statistician 26:81–107. [Reprinted in Borg, I. (ed.) (1981).Multidimensional Data Representations: When and Why, Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1981). Efficacy coefficients for differences among averages. In Borg, I. (ed.),Multidimensional Data Representations: When and Why, Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor, Mich., pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1985). The illogic of statistical inference for cumulative science.Appl. Stochast. Models Data Anal. 1:3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, R. (1970). Parent-offspring correlations in the judgment of visual number.Hum. Hered. 20:57–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Israel Bureau of Statistics (1981a). Demographical survey for 1981.

  • Israel Bureau of Statistics (1981b). Survey of manpower in the Israel economy.

  • Jensen, A. R. (1978). Genetic and behavioral effect of non-random mating. In Noble, C. E., Osborne, R. T., and Weyle, N. (eds.),Human Variation: Biogenetics of Age, Race and Sex, Academic Press, New York, pp. 51–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. A., and Vandenberg, S. G. (1980). Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples.Behav. Genet. 10:59–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaie, K. W., and Parham, I. A. (1976). Stability of adult personality traits: Fact or fable?J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 34:146–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. P., and Truss, C. V. (1985). Stabilityand change in adult personality over 12 and 20 years.Dev. Psychol. 21:568–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, D., and Gregg, B. (1980). Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionary perspective.Ethol. Sociobiol. 1:153–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G. (1972). Assortative mating, or who marries whom?Behav. Genet. 2:127–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. P., and Meredith, W. (1981). Spouse similarity in newlyweds with respect to specific cognitive abilities, socioeconomic status, and education.Behav. Genet. 11:1–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zonderman, A. B., Vandenberg, S. G., Spuhler, K. P., and Fein, P. R. (1977). Assortative marriage of cognitive abilities.Behav. Genet. 7:261–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guttman, R., Zohar, A. Spouse similarities in personality items: Changes over years of marriage and implications for mate selection. Behav Genet 17, 179–189 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065996

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065996

Key Words

Navigation