Skip to main content
Log in

Employment demographics and attitudes that predict preferences for alternative pay increase policies

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of 942 university staff employees shows that performance and cost of living are preferred over seniority as criteria upon which to base pay increases. Multiple regression analysis reveals that preferences for performance-based pay increases are most strongly related to perceptions that merit pay does not decrease co-worker cooperation, perceptions that performance differences exist among co-workers, employment in white collar jobs, and never having belonged to a union. Preferences for seniority-based and cost of living-based pay increases are most strongly related to the perceived need for a union, perceptions that merit pay reduces cooperation, education level, and gender. In addition, preferences for seniority-based pay increases are related to years of service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 272–283). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. E. and Keaveny, T. J. (1981). Correlates of university faculty interest in unionization: A replication and extension.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 582–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. E. and Keaveny, T. J. (1988).Contemporary labor relations, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkin, D. B. and Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1987). Merit pay. In D. B. Balkin and L. R. Gomez-Mejia (Eds.),New perspectives on compensation (pp. 159–160). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basic patterns in union contracts (1986). Washington D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.

  • Child, D. (1970).The essentials of factor analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1975).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, L., Schwab, D. P. and Theriault, R. D. (1976). Managerial perceptions regarding salary increase criteria.Personnel Psychology, 29, 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, J. A. and Fitch, M. K. (1985). The effects of individual and contextual attributes on the sizes of recommended salary increases.Personnel Psychology, 38, 587–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. I. (1989).Compensation management: Rewarding performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koys, D. J. (1988). Human resource management and a culture of respect: Effects on employees' organizational commitment.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krefting, L. A., Newman, J. M. and Krzystofiak, F. (1987). What is a meaningful pay increase? In D. B. Balkin & L. R. Gomez-Mejia (Eds.),New perspectives on compensation (pp. 135–140). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III (1971).Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view (pp. 159–162). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1988). Gender, justice and the psychology of entitlement.Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 124–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1972). The role of money in managing motivation. In H. L. Tosi, R. J. House and M. D. Dunnette (Eds.),Managerial motivation and compensation (pp. 523–539). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Business Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H. H. (1987). How we can implement a pay-for-performance plan successfully? In D. B. Balkin and L. R. Gomez-Mejia (Eds.),New perspectives on compensation (pp. 179–186). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihal, W. L. (1983). More research is needed: Goals may motivate better.Personnel Administrator, October, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich, G. T. and Newman, J. M. (1987).Compensation. Plano, TX: Business Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, P. D., Schwab, D. P., and Heneman, H. G. (1987). Managerial salary raise decisions: A policy-capturing approach.Personnel Psychology, 40, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. J. and Fay, C. H. (1988).Compensation theory and practice. Boston: Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, D. A. (1976).Compensating employees: Lessons of the 1970s (p. 21). New York: The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1955).Money and motivation. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koys, D.J., Keaveny, T.J. & Allen, R.E. Employment demographics and attitudes that predict preferences for alternative pay increase policies. J Bus Psychol 4, 27–47 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023037

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023037

Keywords

Navigation