Abstract
The emergence of local feminist policy networks is set within the context of the New Federalism of the Reagan-Bush administrations and the transformation of the U.S. interest group system over the past three decades. A case study of policymaking in a single urban setting focuses on changes in four policy areas of special interest to women: sexual assault, domestic violence, child care, and displaced homemakers. Single-issue feminist policy networks, composed of feminist advocacy groups, women-run services, local elected officials, and urban bureaucrats responsible for delivering, funding or regulating each policy, have formed around these issues. Each is characterized by: responsive policy changes; frequent interactions between local legislators, bureaucrats, and feminists; interlocking directorates; a symbiotic support system; diverse strategies and funding sources; and a federal-type organization. Local feminists have been incorporated in a new group universe embedded within a complex system of intergovernmental grants, contracts, and mandates. These networks help to sustain feminism and its public policy agenda through crises and challenges.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abney, Glenn and Thomas P. Lauth (1986).The Politics of State and City Administration. Albany: SUNY Press.
Anton, Thomas J. (1989).American Federalism and Public Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Barfield, Claude E. (1981).Rethinking Federalism: Block Grants and Federal, State, and Local Responsibilities. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Berry, Jeffrey (1981). ‘Beyond citizen participation: Effective advocacy before administrative agencies,’Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17: 463–77.
Berry, Jeffrey (1989).The Interest Group Society. New York: HarperCollins, 2nd ed.
Boles, Janet K. (1991). ‘Local elected women and policymaking: Movement delegates or feminist trustees?’ a paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., August 29–September 1.
Boles, Janet K. (1992). ‘Local feminist coalitional strategies: Three models' a paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 3–6.
Boneparth, Ellen (1984). ‘Resources and constraints on women in the policymaking process: State and local arenas,’ in Janet A. Flammang, ed.,Political Women. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 277–90.
Browne, William P. (1990). ‘Organized interests and their issue niches: A search for pluralism in a policy domain,’Journal of Politics 52: 477–509.
Browne, William P. (1991). ‘Issue niches and the limits of interest group influence,’ in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, pp. 345–70.
Buechler, Steven (1990).Women's Movements in the United States: Woman Saffrage, Equal Rights and Beyond. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Burns, Ruth Ann (1979).Women in Municipal Management: Choice, Challenge, and Change. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics.
Center for the American Woman and Politics (1993). ‘Women in Elective Office 1993.’ National Information Bank on Women in Public Office, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
Colman, William C. (1989).State and Local Government and Public-Private Partnerships: A Policy Issues Handbook. New York: Greenwood.
Conlan, Timothy (1988).New Federalism. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Costain, Anne N. and W. Douglas Costain (1983). ‘The women's lobby: Impact of a movement on Congress,’ in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, pp. 191–216.
Costain, Anne N. (1988). ‘Women's claims as a special interest,’ in Carol M. Mueller, ed.,The Politics of the Gender Gap. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 150–72.
Costain, Anne N. (1992).Inviting Women's Rebellion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Directory of Milwaukee Area Women's Organizations (1992). Milwaukee: Center for Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 9th ed.
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia (1989). ‘The government's role in building the women's movement,’Political Science Quarterly 104: 249–68.
Dye, Thomas R. (1990).American Federalism: Competition Among Governments. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Eisenstein, Hester (1991).Gender Shock: Practicing Feminism on Two Continents. Boston: Beacon Press.
Faye, Howard A., Allen Cigler and Paul Schumaker (1986). ‘The municipal group universe: Changes in agency penetration by political groups, 1975–1986,’ a paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., August 28–31.
Flammang, Janet A. (1987). ‘Women made a difference: Comparable worth in San Jose,’ in Mary Fainsod Katzenstein and Carol McClurg Mueller, eds.,The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 290–309.
Franzway, Suzanne et al. (1989).Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy and the State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Freeman, Jo (1983). ‘A model for analyzing the strategic options of social movement organizations,’ in herSocial Movements of the Sixties and Seventies. New York: Longman. pp. 193–210.
Galaskiewicz, Joseph (1989). ‘Interorganizational networks mobilizing action at the metropolitan level,’ in Robert Perucci and Harry R. Potter, eds.,Networks of Power. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 81–96.
Gelb, Joyce and Marian Lief Palley (1987).Women and Public Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, rev. ed.
Glendening, Parris N. and Mavis Mann Reeves (1977).Pragmatic Federalism. Pacific Palisades, CA: Palisades.
Greene, Kenneth R. (1982). ‘Municipal administrators' receptivity to citizens' and elected officials' contacts,’Public Administration Review 42: 346–353.
Hale, Mary M., Rita Mae Kelly and Jayne Burgess (1989). ‘Women in the Arizona Executive branch of government,’ in Mary Hale and Rita Mae Kelly, eds.,Gender, Bureaucracy and Democracy. New York: Greenwood.
Hamilton, Christopher and Donald T. Wells (1990).Federalism, Power, and Political Economy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hayes, Michael T. (1986). ‘The new group universe,’ in Allen J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2nd ed., pp. 133–45.
Heclo, Hugh (1978). ‘Issue networks and the executive establishment,’ in Anthony King, ed.,The New American Political System. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, pp. 87–124.
Heinz, John P. et al. (1990). ‘Inner circles or hollow cores? Elite networks in national policy systems,’Journal of Politics 52: 356–90.
Jordan, A. Grant (1981). ‘Iron triangles, woolly corporatism and elastic nets: Images of the policy process,’Journal of Public Policy 1: 95–123.
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod (1990). ‘Feminism within American institutions’,Signs 16: 27–54.
King, Lauriston R. and W. Wayne Shannon (1986). ‘Political networks in the policy process: The case of the national sea grant college program,’Polity 19: 213–31.
Knoke, David (1990). ‘The mobilization of members in women's associations’, in Louise A. Tilly and Patricia Gurin, eds.,Women, Politics, and Change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 383–410.
Levine, Charles H. and James A. Thurber (1986). ‘Reagan and the intergovernmental lobby: Iron triangles, cozy subsystems, and political conflict,’ in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2nd ed., pp. 202–20.
Loomis, Burdett A. (1986). ‘Coalitions of interests: Building bridges in the balkanized state,’ in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2nd. ed., pp. 258–74.
Milward, H. Brinton and Gary L. Wamsley (1984). ‘Policy subsystems, networks and the tools of public management,’ in Robert Eyestone, ed.,Public Policy Formation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 3–25.
Oliver, Pamela and Mark Furman (1989). ‘Contradictions between national and local organizational strength: The case of the John Birch Society,’ in Bert Klandermans, ed.,Organizing for Change: Social Movement Organizations in Europe and the United States. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 155–77.
Osborne, David and Ted A. Gaebler (1992).Reinventing Government. Redding, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Peterson, Paul E. (1981).City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Salisbury, Robert H. et al. (1987). ‘Who works with whom? Interest group alliances and opposition,’American Political Science Review 81: 1217–34.
Salisbury, Robert H. (1991). ‘Putting interests back into interest groups,’ in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 3rd ed., pp. 371–84.
Schumaker, Paul (1991).Critical Pluralism, Democratic Performance and Community Power. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Shaiko, Ronald G. (1991). ‘More bang for the buck: The new era of full-service public interest organizations,’ in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 3rd ed., pp. 109–29.
Thomas, Clive S. and Ronald J. Hrebenar (1991). ‘Nationalization of interest groups and lobbying in the states,’ in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, pp. 63–80, 3rd ed.
Thurber, James A. (1991). ‘Dynamics of policy subsystems in American politics,’ in Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds.,Interest Group Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, pp. 319–43, 3rd ed.
U.s. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1986).The Transformation in American Politics: Implications for Federalism. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Labor, Women's Bureau (1990).Commissions, Committees, and Councils on the Status of Women. Washington, D.C.: mimeographed.
Walker, Jack L. (1981). ‘The diffusion of knowledge, policy communities and agenda setting: The relationship of knowledge and power,’ in John E. Tropman, Milan J. Dluhy, and Roger M. Lind, eds.,New Strategic Perspectives on Social Policy. New York: Pergaman, pp. 75–96.
Walker, Jack L. (1983). ‘The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America,’American Political Science Review 77: 390–406.
Walker, Jack L. (1991).Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Wolman, Harold and Fred Teitelbaum (1985). ‘Interest groups and the Reagan Presidency,’ in Lester M. Salamon and Michael S. Lund, eds.,The Reagan Presidency and the Governing of America. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, pp. 297–329.
Wright, Deil S. and Harley L. White (1984). ‘Introduction,’ in theirFederalism and Intergovernmental Relations. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Public Administration, pp. 1–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boles, J.K. Local feminist policy networks in the contemporary American interest group system. Policy Sci 27, 161–178 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999886
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999886