Skip to main content
Log in

Development of models of optimal complexity using self-organization theory

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An organized approach is considered for determining the best functional (usually polynomial) form of a mathematical model for a complex system using the minimum ofa priori information. It is necessary to know only the list of the variables that may possibly take part in the model, the corresponding table of data, and the general criterion that the model is to satisfy (e.g., “the prediction is to be accurate” or “the model is to be unbiassed”). The computer, with the help of a special organized sifting of models, uses the self-organization principle to find a unique model of optimal complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. G. Ivakhnenko, “Polynomial theory of complex systems,”IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. SMC-1:364–376 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. V. Koppa, “AnA 3 Go 3-Bésm 6 programme for interpolation using the GMDH algorithm with polynomials of first and second degree,”Sov. Autom. Control 4(1):69–71 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. G. Ivakhnenko, Yu. V. Koppa, N. N. Todua, and G. Petracne, “Mathematical simulation of complex ecological systems,”Sov. Autom. Control 4:(1):15, 626 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. G. Ivakhnenko, “Problems of simulation of complex systems and of applied mathematical statistics,”Sov. Autom. Control 4(6):1–6 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. G. Ivakhnenko and Yu. V. Chukin, “Purposeful regularization in short and medium term prediction problems by finding the trend of optimum complexity,”Sov. Autom. Control 5(1):43–49;6:55–58 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Gabor, “Summary of ‘Perspective of Planning’, ”Sov. Autom. Control 5:58–67 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Shankar, “The Group Method of Data Handling,” MA thesis, University of Delaware, College Park, Md. (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. G. Ivakhnenko, “Structural identification of differential equations by small number of observations using self-organization methods,”Sov. Autom. Control 5:31–54;5(6):6–12 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. G. Ivakhnenko, and N. N. Todua, “Prediction of random processes using self-organization at the prediction equations,”Sov. Autom. Control, Part 15(3):31–51; Part u6(2):32–47; Part III6(3): 11–28 (1972).

  10. N. A. Ivakhnenko and M. Z. Kvasko, “Combination-generating GMDH algorithm in which the regularity of both ‘symmetrical’ and ‘nonsymetrical’ polynomials is checked,”Sov. Autom. Control 5(5):33–38 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. G. Ivakhnenko, N. N. Todua, and A. A. Fomichev, “Structural synthesis of filters for indirect measurement of variables and the generalized GMDH algorithm,”Sov. Autom. Control 6(1):37–46 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. G. Ivakhnenko and V. A. Toloknyanenko, “Control with prediction optimization: simple continuous plant model,”Sov. Autom. Control 6(2):48–55 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. G. Ivakhnenko, G. Petrache, N. V. Gulyan, and V. A. Ovchinnikov, “Control of complex systems with prediction optimization based on self-organization,”Sov. Autom. Control 6(4):24–40 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Ivakhnenko, V. V. Shervashidze, O. I. Sheludko, S. G. Patereu, and N. A. Ivakhnenko, “Discovery of physical laws with the absence-of-bias criteria,”Sov. Autom. Control 6(6):32–44 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. G. Ivakhnenko and N. A. Ivakhnenko, “Long term prediction of random processes by the GMDH algorithms with the unbiassedness and variable balance criteria,”Sov. Autom. Control 7(4):40–45 (1974);8(4):50–60 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. I. Duffy, “Identification at Soil Nitrogen Transformations in Agricultural Ecosystem,” PhD thesis, Washington University, Sever Institute of Technology, St. Louis, Mo. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Parks and A. Ivakhnenko, “Self-organization of the Britain economic system model (by balance-of-variable criterion) for the prediction optimization control,”Sov. Autom. Control (6) (1974).

  18. “The developing of GMDH in the USA,” Summary, Part II,Sov. Autom. Control 7(2):50–68 (1974).

  19. H. S. Witsenhausen, “On the uncertainty of future preferences,”Ann. Econ. Soc. Meas. 3:91–94 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Bar-Shalom and E. Tse, “Dual effect, certainty equivalence and separation in stochastic control,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 494–500 (October 1974).

  21. S. K. Kasperovich, “Modeling Complex Systems with Multipolynomial Networks,” IEEE Region Six Conference, US Western Region, Minicomputers and Their Applications, Honolulu, Hawaii, (May 2–4, 1973).

  22. D. F. Scott and C. Hutchison, “Modelling of Economic Systems,” National Science Foundation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (March 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Duffy and M. A. Franklin, “Case Study of Environmental System Modeling with the Group Method of Data Handling,Proceedings of the 1973 JACC, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivakhnenko, A.G. Development of models of optimal complexity using self-organization theory. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 8, 111–127 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989666

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989666

Key words

Navigation