Abstract
Wild and domestic Norway rats (Rattus norvegiens) were compared in regard to their tendency to investigate the odors of fresh vs. aged rat urine and to urine-mark metal rods and wooden blocks placed in their home cages. Castration, sex, and domestication had no effect on the tendency to investigate sources of fresh vs. aged urine odors, but the odor of aged urine was more attractive than fresh urine for most subjects tested. The frequency of urine marking was lower for females and castrated males but generally did not differ between wild and domestic stocks. The implications of these findings for the ecology of the species are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, S.A. 1958. Experiments on “neophobia” in wild and laboratory rats.Br. J. Psychol. 49:195–201.
Barnett, S.A. 1975. The Rat. A Study in Behavior, 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 310 pp.
Boice, R. 1973. Domestication.Psychol. Bull. 80:215–230.
Bronson, F.H., andCaroom, D. 1971. Preputial gland of the male mouse; attractant function.J. Reprod. Fertil. 25:279–282.
Bronson, F.H., andDesjardins, C. 1974. Relationships between scent marking by male mice and the pheromone-induced secretion of the gonadotropic and ovarian hormones that accompany puberty in female mice,in W. Montagna and W. A. Sadler (eds.). Reproductive Behavior, Advances in Behavioral Biology No. 11, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 157–178.
Brown, R.E. 1975a. A common scale for conspeciflc odour preferences of rats. Paper pre- sented at NE Regional Animal Behavior Society Meeting, Halifax, Nova Scotia, October 10–13, 1975.
Brown, R.E. 1975b. Object-directed urine-marking by male rats (Rattus norvegiens). Behav. Biol. 15:251–254.
Calhoun, J.B. 1962. The Ecology and Sociology of the Norway Rat. United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland, 288 pp.
Carr, W.J., Loeb, L.S., andDissinger, M.L. 1965. Responses of rats to sex odors.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 59:370–377.
Cowan, P.E., andBarnett, S.A. 1975. The new-object and new-place reactionsof Rattus rattus L.Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 56:219–234.
Desjardins, C., Maruniak, J.A., andBronson, F.H. 1973. Social rank in house mice: Differentiation revealed by ultraviolet visualization of urinary marking patterns.Science 182:939–941.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1950. Beitrage zur Biologie der Haus-und Ährenmaus nebst einigen Beobachtungen an anderen Nagern.Z. Tierpsychol. 7:558–587.
Eisenberg, J.F., andKleiman, D.G. 1972. Olfactory communication in mammals.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:1–32.
Grant, E.C. 1963. An analysis of the social behaviour of the male laboratory rat.Behaviour 21:260–281.
Grant, E.C., andMackintosh, J.H. 1963. A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents.Behaviour 21:246–259.
Jones, R.B., andNowell, N.W. 1973. The effect of urine on the investigatory behaviour of male albino mice.Physiol. Behav. 11:35–38.
Krames, L., Carr, W.J., andBergman, B. 1969. A pheromone associated with social dominance among male rats.Psychon. Sci. 16:11–12.
Lydell, K., andDoty, R.L. 1972. Male rat odor preferences for female urine as a function of sexual experience, urine age and urine source.Horm. Behav. 3:205–212.
Mitchell, D. 1976. Experiments on neophobia in wild and laboratory rats: A reevaluation.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 90:190–197.
Mykytowycz, R. 1973. Reproduction of mammals in relation to environmental odours.J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 19:431–444.
Mykytowycz, R. 1974. Odor in the spacing behaviour of mammals,in M. C. Birch (ed.), Pheromones, Frontiers of Biology No. 32, American Elsevier, New York, pp. 327–343.
Pfaff, D., andPfaffman, C. 1969. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of male rats to female rat urine odors,in C. Pfaffman (ed.), Olfaction and Taste: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, Rockefeller University Press, New York, pp. 258–267.
Price, E.O. 1975. Hormonal control of urine-marking in wild and domestic Norway rats.Horm. Behav. 6:393–397.
Price, E.O., andKing, J.A. 1968. Domestication and adaptation,in E.S.E. Hafez (ed.), Adaptation of Domestic Animals, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 34–45.
Reiff, M. 1956. Untersuchungen über natürliche und synthetische Geruchsstoffe die bei Ratten und Mausen eine stimulierende Wirkung auslosen.Acta Trop. 13:289–318.
Richards, D.B., andStevens, D.A. 1974. Evidence for marking with urine by rats.Behav. Biol. 12:517–523.
Schultz, E.F., andTapp, J.T. 1973. Olfactory control of behavior in rodents.Psychol. Bull. 79:21–44.
Scott, J.W., andPfaff, D.W. 1970. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of female mice to male urine odors.Physiol. Behav. 5:407–411.
Steiniger, F. 1950. Über Duftmarkierung bei der Wanderratte.Z. Angew. Zool. 38:357–361.
Stoddart, D.M. 1974. The role of odor in the social biology of small mammals,in M. C. Birch (ed.), Pheromones, Frontiers of Biology No. 32, American Elsevier, New York, pp. 297–315.
Telle, H.-J. 1966. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Verhaltensweise von Ratten, vergleichend dargestellt beiRattus norvegiens undRattus rattus.Z. Angew. Zool. 53:129–196. (Available in English as Technical Translation 1608, Translation Section, National Science Library, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario).
Welch, J.F. 1953. Formation of urinating “posts” by house mice (Mus) held under restricted conditions.J. Mammal. 34:502–503.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, E.O. Urine-marking and the response to fresh vs. aged urine in wild and domestic Norway rats. J Chem Ecol 3, 9–25 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988130
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988130