Skip to main content
Log in

The consequent-entailment problem foreven if

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

A comprehensive theory ofeven if needs to account for consequent ‘entailing’even ifs and in particular those of theif-focused variety. This is where the theory ofeven if ceases to be neutral between conditional theories. I have argued thatif-focusedeven ifs,especially if andonly if can only be accounted for through the suppositional theory ofif. Furthermore, a particular interpretation of this theory — the conditional assertion theory — is needed to account foronly if and a type of metalinguistic negation ofQ if P. We therefore have evidence that the currently accepted approaches to conditionals are basically wrong about the semantic forms they attribute toif P, Q.11

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, S. J.: 1991, ‘Even, Still and Counterfactuals’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, S. J.: 1993, ‘Conditional Excluded Middle, Conditional Assertion andOnly If’,Analysis 53, 254–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, S. J.: 1994, ‘Towards a Pragmatic Theory of ‘if’’, forthcoming inPhilosophical Studies.

  • Bennett, J.: 1982, ‘Even if'’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 403–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudman, V. H.: 1989, ‘Vive la Révolution!’,Mind 98, 591–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, M.: 1973, ‘If and Unless’,Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renee Kahane (Urbana), pp. 231–251.

  • Geis, M. and Zwicky, A.: 1971, ‘On Invited Inferences’,Linguistic Inquiry 2, 561–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiman, J.: 1978, ‘Conditionals are Topics’,Language 54, 564–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.: 1969, ‘A Presuppositional Theory of ‘Only’ and ‘Even’’, in Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R.: 1989,A Natural History of Negation, The University of Chicago Press.

  • Jackson, F.: 1987,Conditionals, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, E.: 1986, ‘Conditionals, Concessive Conditionals and Concessives: Areas of Contact, Overlap and Neutralization’, in E. Traugottet al. (eds.),On Conditionals, Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–246.

  • Kratzer, A.: 1986, ‘Conditionals’,Chicago Linguistics Society 22(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G.: 1991, ‘Even and Even if’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 115–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1981, ‘A Defence of Conditional Excluded Middle’, in W. Harperet al. (eds.),Ifs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance andTime, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Stechow, A. von and Uhman, S.: 1986, ‘Some Remarks on Focus Projection’, in Abraham W.,et al. (eds.),Topic, Focus, and Configurationality, Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barker, S.J. The consequent-entailment problem foreven if . Linguist Philos 17, 249–260 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985037

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985037

Keywords

Navigation