Fasciculations: Clinical, electromyographic, and ultrasonographic assessment

Abstract

Widespread fasciculations are an important clinical sign in, for example, degenerative lower motor neuron diseases (LMND). Usually they are detected by clinical inspection and electromyography. Recently myosonography has been proposed for the detection of fasciculations. This prospective study compares the value of these three modes of examination in patients with degenerative LMND. Seventy healthy control persons and 34 patients (11 women, 23 men; aged 43–78 years; median age 60.5) with LMND were included in the study. All participants were subjected to thorough visual screening for the presence of fasciculations. Fourteen muscles were examined bilaterally by myosonography and a median of 8 muscles were screened electromyographically (only in the patients); the investigators were blinded to the other findings. Clinical inspection and ultrasonography exhibited fasciculations in up to 5 and 8 muscles, respectively, in 8 healthy persons. Ultrasonography demonstrated fasciculations in all patients, clinical inspection in all but 2, and electromyography in 26 of 33 patients (1 patient was not examined electromyographically). Comparing the three methods, clinical observation revealed fasciculations in 42%, electromyography in 39%, and ultrasonography in 67% of all muscles. Thus, ultrasonography was significantly more sensitive than the other techniques (P < 0.001). The interrater agreement (correlation coefficient)r in respect of the presence or absence of fasciculation was 0.71 for the clinical, 0.85 for the electromyographic and 0.84 for the myosonographic examinations. Ultrasonography and electromyography were more reliable than the clinical examination (P < 0.001 andP < 0.01, respectively). Our study indicates that ultrasonography is more sensitive than clinical and electromyographic examination in visualizing fasciculations in patients with LMND. Additionally, it is more reliable than clinical examination.