Skip to main content
Log in

On criteria for measures of compositional difference

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simple perceptions about the nature of compositions lead through logical necessity to certain forms of analysis of compositional data. In this paper the consequences of essential requirements of scale, perturbation and permutation invariance, together with that of subcompositional dominance, are applied to the problem of characterizing change and measures of difference between two compositions. It will be shown that one strongly advocated scalar measure of difference fails these tests of logical necessity, and that one particular form of scalar measure of difference (the sum of the squares of all possible logratio differences in the components of the two compositions), although not unique, emerges as the simplest and most tractable satisfying the criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J., 1986a, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 1986b, CODA: A Microcomputer Package for the Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 1990, Comment on “Measures of Variability for Geological Data” by D. F. Watson and G. M. Philip: Math. Geol., v. 22, p. 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 1991, Delusions of Uniqueness and Ineluctability: Math. Geol., v. 23, p. 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 1992, Principles of Compositional Data Analysis, in Anderson, T. W., Olkin, I. and Fang, K. T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium of Multivariate Analysis and its Applications, Institute of Mathematical Statistics. To appear.

  • Lehmann, E. L., 1959, Testing Statistical Hypotheses: New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. F., 1990, Reply to Comment on “Measures of Variability for Geological Data” by D. F. Watson and G. M. Philip: Math. Geol., v. 22, p. 227–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. F., 1991, Reply to “Delusions of Uniqueness and Ineluctability” by J. Aitchison: Math. Geol., v. 23, p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. F., and Philip, G. M., 1989, Measures of Variability for Geological Data: Math. Geol., v. 21, p. 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woronow, A., and Love, K. M., 1990, Quantifying and Testing Differences Among Means of Compositional Data Suites: Math. Geol., v. 22, p. 837–852.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aitchison, J. On criteria for measures of compositional difference. Math Geol 24, 365–379 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891269

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891269

Key words

Navigation