Skip to main content
Log in

Farmers' irrigation practices in a high rainfall area

Effects on soil moisture

  • Published:
Irrigation and Drainage Systems

Abstract

Recent droughts in the humid southeastern United States have focused attention on the need for and use of supplemental irrigation. Total annual rainfall amounts are sufficient for most crops in the region. However, erratic distribution of rainfall and the low water-holding capacities of most soils in the region cause frequent drought stresses in many crops. An on-farm study was conducted in southeastern Alabama to evaluate the effects of farmers' irrigation scheduling decisions on soil moisture variations in peanut fields irrigated with center-pivot irrigation systems. The study showed that the way irrigation was practiced in this high rainfall area often caused soil moisture deficit (SMD) level higher than the desired SMD limit during over 20% of the 140-day growing season. This is partially due to farmers' tendency to delay irrigation in anticipation of rainfall which may or may not occur, as rainfall during the growing season is often erratic and local. In contrast SMD in non-irrigated fields was higher than the SMD limit for half of the growing season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SMD:

soil moisture deficit

ET:

evapotranspiration

Reff :

effective rainfall

WHC:

water holding capacity

References

  • Bruce R.R., Chesness J.L., Keisling T.C., Pallas, Jr J.E., Smittle D.A., Stansell J.R. & Thomas A.W. 1980. Irrigation of Crops in the Southeastern United States: Principles and Practices. USDA-ARS. New Orleans, La. ARM-S-9.

  • Camp C.R. & Campbell R.B. 1988. Scheduling Irrigation for Corn in the Southeast. ARS Series No. 65. Agr. Res. Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp C.R., Sadler E.J., Sneed R.E., Hook J.E. & Ligetvari F. 1990. Irrigation for humid areas. In: Hoffman G.J., Howell T.A. & Soloman K.H. (Eds) Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. Chapter 15. ASAE, Monograph. St. Joseph, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty C.W., Camp C.R. & Christenbury G.D. 1982. Scheduling irrigation in the southeast with a screened evaporation pan. In: Proc. Specialty Conf. on Environmentally Sound Water and Soil Management, ASCE (pp 475–483). New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert J.R. 1980. Irrigation management — humid areas. In: Proc. of the 2nd Natl. Irrigation Symposium. Irrigation Challenge of the 80's. ASAE, Pub. 6-81 (pp 175–184). St. Joseph, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert J.R., Israel I. & Meirson I. 1988 Computer program for scheduling irrigation by water budget. In: Scheduling Irrigation for Corn in the Southeast. Camp C.R. & Campbell R.B., Coordinators. Chapter 2. ARS Series No. 65. Agr. Res. Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom D.R., Stegman E.C. & Werner H.D. 1981. Irrigation scheduling by the checkbook method. Proc. Irrigation Scheduling for Water and Energy Conservation in the 80's. ASAE Spec. Pub. 23-81 (pp 187–193). St. Joseph, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin D.L., Stegman E.C. & Fereres E. 1990. Irrigation scheduling principles. In: Hoffman G.J., Howell T.A. & Soloman K.H. (Eds) Management of Farm Irrigation Systems Chapter 7. ASAE, Monograph. St. Joseph, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads F.M. & Stanley, Jr R.L. 1978. Effect of population and fertility on nutrient uptake and yield components of irrigated corn. Soil and Crop Soc. (Florida) 38: 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochester E.W. & Busch C.D. 1972. Scheduling model which incorporates rainfall predictions. Water Resour. Bull. 8(3): 608–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochester E.W., Backman P.A., Mcguire J.A., Curtis L.M., Starling J. & Ivey H. 1984. Irrigation schedules for peanut productio. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University. Bulletin 556. Auburn, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansell J.R., Shepherd J.L., Pallas J.E. & Bruce R.R. 1976. Peanut response to soil water variables in the Southeast. Peanut Science 3(1): 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockle C.O. & Dugas W.A. 1989. Effect of weather variability and precipitation uncertainty on grain sorghum irrigation scheduling. Transactions of the ASAE 32(6): 1939–1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson T.W. & Curtis L.M. 1990. Scheduling irrigation in the Southeast with minimum inputs. In: Proc. The Third National Irrigation Symposium: Visions of the Future. ASAE, Pub. 04-90 (pp 688–691). St. Joseph, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Soil Conservation Service. 1974. Chapter 1. Soil-plant-water relationship. In: SCS National Engineering Hand Book. Section 15 Irrigation. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalobos F.J. & Fereres E. 1989. A simulation model for irrigation scheduling under variable rainfall. Transactions of the ASAE 32(1): 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bernuth R.D., Martin D.L., Gilley J.R. & Watts D.G. 1984. Irrigation system capacities for corn production in Nebraska. Transactions of the ASAE 27(2): 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westesen G.L. & Hanson T.L. 1981. Irrigation scheduling using washtub evaporation pans. In: Proc. Irrigation Scheduling for Water and Energy Conservation in the 80's. ASAE Spec. Pub. 23-81 (pp 144–149). St. Joseph, MI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, K.S., Yoo, K.H., Tyson, T.W. et al. Farmers' irrigation practices in a high rainfall area. Irrig Drainage Syst 7, 221–229 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881281

Key words

Navigation