Skip to main content
Log in

Accounting for organizational misconduct

  • Behavioral Aspects Of Business Ethics
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizational misconduct (white collar, corporate and occupational crime, unethical behavior, rule violations, etc.) is an increasingly important social concern. This paper proposes that a necessary step toward preventing and treating such misconduct is the understanding of the explanations, called accounts, given by the actor. We argue that the theorizing and findings in the literature on accounts can be organized into a 2×2 matrix framework. The first dimension centers on whether or not the actor admits that some net harm is done by the act, and the second consists of whether or not the actor admits responsibility. When both are admitted (cell 1), the account is a concession, while denial of both constitutes a refusal (cell 4). Admitting responsibility but not harm equates to a justification (cell 2), and the opposite condition is an excuse (cell 3). Building on this matrix, we specify a typology of explanations within each cell which will highlight inter-cell differences. Finally, we explore the implications of this analysis for managers, regulators, and the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J. L.: 1961, ‘A Plea for Excuses’, in J. D. Urmson and G. Warnock (eds.),Philosophical Papers (Clarendon Press, Oxford), pp. 123–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S.: 1988, ‘Who Commits Corporate Wrongdoing: Predicting Illegal Corporate Behavior Using Event History Analysis’, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.

  • Blank, S. J.: 1986a, ‘Taking A Byte Out of Crime: Some Guidelines on Computer Theft Prevention’,Management Review 75 (January), pp. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. J.: 1986b, ‘Fighting Employee Theft: Guidelines’,Management Review 75 (January), pp. 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P. W.: 1974, ‘The Honoring of Accounts’,American Sociological Review 39, pp. 551–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J.: 1985, ‘White Collar Crime’,Annual Review of Sociology 11, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, M. B. and Yeager, P. C.: 1980,Corporate Crime (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A.: 1985, ‘On Slipping When You Thought You Had Put Your Best Foot Forward: Self-Promotion, Self-Destruction, and Entitlements’,Group and Organization Studies 10, pp. 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A.: 1988, ‘The Effect of Administrative Accounts and Gender on the Perception of Leadership’,Group and Organization Studies 13(2), pp. 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A. and Knouse, S. B.: 1990, ‘Justifying Wrongful Employee Behavior: The Role of Personality in Organizational Sabotage’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, pp. 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A. and Payne, S. L.: 1987, ‘Are Business Leaders Staging a Morality Play?’,Business and Society Review 62 (Summer), pp. 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A. and Pollard, H. G.: 1987, ‘The Efficacy of Accounts for a Breach of Confidentiality by Management’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: 1971,Relations in Public: Micro Studies of the Public Order (Penguin, Harmondsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. P. and Stokes, R.: 1975, ‘Disclaimers’,American Sociological Review 40, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C. and Clark, J. P.: 1982, ‘Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance’,The Sociological Quarterly 23, pp. 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C. and Clark, J. P.: 1983,Theft by Employees (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. and Nisbett, R. E.: 1971, ‘The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior’, in E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, and B. Weiner (eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ), pp. 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A. and Jaster, F.: 1989, ‘“Blaming the Victim” and Other Ways Business Men and Women Account for Questionable Behavior’,Journal of Business Ethics 8, pp. 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W. D.: 1983, ‘Corporate Doublespeak: Making Bad News Look Good’,Business and Society Review 44 (Winter), pp. 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, R. F. and Short, J. F., Jr.: 1982, ‘The Consequences of White-Collar Crime’, in H. Edelhertz and T. D. Overcast (eds.),White-Collar Crime: An Agenda for Research (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), pp. 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olasky, M. N: 1985, ‘Inside the Amoral World of Public Relations: Truth Molded for Corporate Gain’,Business and Society Review 52 (Winter), pp. 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, C. A., Marlin, N. A. and Gidwani C.: 1985, ‘Accounts Offered for Unethical Research Practices: Effects on the Evaluations of Acts and Actors’, unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri-Rolla.

  • Schlenker, B. R.: 1980,Impression Management (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönbach, P.: 1980, ‘A Category System for Account Phases’,European Journal of Social Psychology 10, pp. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönbach, P.: 1990,Account Episodes: The Management or Escalation of Conflict (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. B. and Lyman, S. M.: 1968, ‘Accounts’,American Sociological Review 33, pp. 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G. R. and Manstead, A. S. R.: 1983,The Accountability of Conduct: A Social Psychological Analysis (Academic Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. S.: 1986, ‘The Decomposition of Antitrust: Testing a Multi-Level, Longitudinal Model of Profit-Squeeze’,American Sociological Review 51, pp. 859–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. S.: 1987, ‘Cycles of Illegality: Antitrust Violations in Corporate America’,Social Forces 65, pp. 943–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L. and Stucky, R. J.: 1983,Excuses: Masquerades in Search of Grace (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. and Szwajkowski, E. W.: 1975, ‘The Scarcity-Munificence Component of Organizational Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts’,Administrative Science Quarterly 20, pp. 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinyard, W. R., Rinne, H. and Kau, A. K.: 1990, ‘The Morality of Software Piracy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, pp. 655–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwajkowski, E. W.: 1981, ‘The Shadow of Effectiveness: An Investigation of Illegal Corporate Activity’, unpublished dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Szwajkowski, E. W.: 1986, ‘The Myths and Realities of Research on Organizational Misconduct’, in J. E. Post (ed.),Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI, Greenwich, CT), pp. 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwajkowski, E. W.: 1989, ‘Lessons for the Consultant from Research on Employee Misconduct’,Consultation 9(3), pp. 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwajkowski, E. W. and Larwood, L.: 1985, ‘Determinants of Organizational Misconduct’, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego, August.

  • Tedeschi, J. T. and Reiss, M.: 1981, ‘Verbal Strategies in Impression Management’, in C. Antaki (ed.),The Psychology of Ordinary Explanations of Social Behavior (Academic Press, London), pp. 271–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J.: 1989, ‘Employee Theft as Social Control’,Deviant Behavior 10, pp. 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waegel, W. B., Ermann, M. D. and Horowitz, A. M.: 1981, ‘Organizational Responses to Imputations of Deviance’,The Sociological Quarterly 22 (Winter), pp. 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R.: 1986, ‘White-Collar Crime: The Threat from Within’,Management Review 75 (January), pp. 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Eugene Szwajkowski has taught in the Department of Management of the University of Illinois at Chicago since 1978, and as a visiting professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and at the University of Notre Dame. For the past fifteen years, Dr. Szwajkowski has been engaged in research on various aspects of illegal and unethical behavior within and on behalf of organizations. His research has investigated such practices as price-fixing and anti-competitive acquisitions, employee theft and sabotage, sex and race discrimination, and deceptive advertising.

The author gratefully acknowledges the generous contributions of Drs. Laurie Larwood and Darold Barnum, and of two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szwajkowski, E. Accounting for organizational misconduct. J Bus Ethics 11, 401–411 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00870552

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00870552

Keywords

Navigation