Summary
This study investigates an alternative method to the Langley plot, a widely used but complex calibration method for sunphotometers. A sunphotometer has been calibrated using two different methods: the Langley method, a calibration to the extraterrestrial irradiance, and second by comparison to a standard instrument. The standard instrument used for these studies is spectrophotometer. The relative difference between the calibration factors obtained by the two methods is between 0.13% for the channel with the greatest sensitivity (500 nm) and 2% for the channel with the lowest signal (368 nm). The accuracy of both calibrations is of the same order of magnitude with relative errors between 1.2 and 7% for the Langley method and 2.9 to 5.3% for the standard instrument method. Analyses of the origin of possible errors show the sensitivity of the Langley method to less than ideal weather conditions, which could cause an error in calibration of up to 45% under extreme conditions and when too few measurements are made. This studies are made only for the UV and the visible range, investigations about the application of this technique in the near IR have still to be done and would also require spectrometers with a wider sensitivity range.
These investigations do not alter the fact that frequent calibrations are still needed due to sensitivity changes like filter degradation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chai, A. T., Green, A. E. S., 1976: Ratio Measurement of diffuse to direct solar irradiance in the middle ultraviolet.Appl. Opt. 15(5), 1182–1187.
Dirmhirn, I., 1984: Spektrale UV-Strahlung im Gebrige. Proceedings Rauris ITAM 1986, 400–405.
Dirmhirn, I., Sreedharan, C. R., Venugopal, G., 1993: Spectral ultraviolet radiation instrument and preliminary measurements in mountainous terrain.Theor. Appl. Climatol. 46(4), 219–228.
Dunkelman, L., Scolnik, R. 1959: Solar spectral irradiance and vertical atmospheric attenuation in the visible and ultraviolet.J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 49, 356–367.
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., 1990: Precipitable water in the Sahel measured using sun photometry.Agric. Forest Met. 52, 95–107.
Kremser, K., Koepke, P., Quenzel, H., 1984: Aersol optical thickness from direct solar radiation improved Langley method applied to measured data. In: Fieco, G. (ed.)I.R.S. 84 Current problems in Atmospheric Radiation. Hampton Virginia U.S.A.: A. Deepak.
Krüger, O., 1989: Atmosphärenkorrektur von Thematic Mapper-Messungen über Wattengebieten der Deutschen Bucht, Bericht GKSS-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmBH.
Neckel, H., Labs, D., 1984: The solar radiation between 330 and 12500 A.Solar Physics. 90, 205–258.
Shaw, G. E., 1976: Error analysis of multi-wavelength sun photometry.Pure Appl. Geophys. 114, 1–14.
Thome, K. J., Herman, B. M., Reagan, J. A., 1992: Determination of precipitable water from solar transmission.J. Appl. Meteor. 31, 157–165.
Walker, J. H., Saunders, R. D., Jackson, J. H., McSparron, D. A., 1987: Spectral irradiance calibrations. NBS Spec. Publ. 250-20.
Wobrock, W., Eiden, R., 1988: Direct solar radiation: spectrum and irradiance derived from sunphotometer measurements.Appl. Opt. 27(11), 2253–2260.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
With 6 Figures
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weihs, P., Dirmhirn, I. & Czerwenka-Wenkstetten, I.M. Calibration of sunphotometer for measurements of turbidity. Theor Appl Climatol 51, 97–104 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00865544
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00865544