Abstract
Recently, it has been suggested that lateral (LAT) spine bone mass measurements by absorptiometry may be more sensitive for detecting bone loss than the standard anteroposterior (AP) projection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of LAT spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and its diagnostic sensitivity. A group of 1554 subjects with no risk factors that might affect bone metabolism and 185 osteoporotic patients with vertebral fractures were studied. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lumbar spine (standard AP and LAT projections) and proximal femur with a DEXA absorptiometer. The precision of the measurements was assessed in 15 volunteers. Diagnostic sensitivity was evaluated by the Z-score method. Comparing young people and the elderly, spine bone loss in the latter was similar for AP and LAT projections, when it was evaluated in absolute values (glcm2). However, when it was evaluated in percentage terms, bone loss was about twice as high in the LAT projection. LAT spine BMD correlated significantly with all the other areas assessed. The best correlation was found with the standard AP projection (r=0.67,P<0.0001). The precision in the LAT projection was found to be within an acceptable range (1.6% in normal subjects, 2% in osteoporotic patients), even though it was about twice that obtained in the AP projection. Diagnostic sensitivity was also better with the AP projection. It is concluded that LAT spine BMD measurements can be assessed with acceptable precision although it is about twice as high as for AP spine measurements. The percentage decrease in BMD in the elderly is greater for measurements made in the LAT projection than for measurements made in the AP projection. However, there is no enhancement of diagnostic sensitivity in osteoporosis. BMD measurements in the LAT projection are not as good as in the AP projection but they may offer complementary information of the regional evolution of spine bone mass.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gluer CC, Genant HK. Impact of marrow fat on accuracy of quantitative CT.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989; 13:1023–1035.
Rupich R, Pacifici R, Griffin M, Vered I, Susman N, Avioli LV. Lateral dual energy radiography: a new method for measuring vertebral bone density: a preliminary study.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 70:1768–1770.
Slosman DO, Rizzoli R, Donath A, Bonjour J-P. Vertebral bone mineral density measured laterally by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.Osteoporosis Int 1990; 1:23–29.
Finkelstein JS, Cleary RL, Butler JP, et al. A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia.J. Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994; 78:724–730.
Reid IR, Evans MC, Stapleton J. Lateral spine densitometry is a more sensitive indicator of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss.J Bone Miner Res 1992; 7:1221–1225.
Mazzes RB, Gifford CA, Bisek JP, Barden HS, Hanson JA. DEXA measurement of spine density in the lateral projection. I. Methodology.Calcif Tissue Int 1991; 49:235–239.
Del Rio L, Romera M, Pavfa J, et al. Bone mineral density in two different socioeconomic population groups.Bone Miner 1992; 18:159–168.
Lauritzen JB, McNair PA, Lund B. Risk factors for hip fractures.Dan Med Bull 1993; 40:479–485.
Johansson C, Mellstrom D, Milson I. Reproductive factors as predictors of bone density and fractures in women at the age of 70.Maturitas 1993; 17:39–50.
Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL. Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites.J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:1227–1233.
Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures.Lancet 1993; 341:72–75.
Wasnich R. Bone mass measurement: prediction of risk.Am J Med 1993; 95:6S-10S.
Eastell R, Mosekilde L, Hodgson SF, Riggs BL. Proportion of human vertebral body bone that is cancellous.J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5:1237–1241.
Genant HK, Block JE, Steiger P, Glueer CC, Smith R. Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis.Semin Nucl Med 1987; 316–333.
Sambrook PN, Bartlett C, Evans R, et al. Measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral: a comparison of dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.Br J Radiol 1985; 58:621–624.
Uebelhart D, Duboeuf F, Meunier P, Delmas P. Vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) measurement assessed by lateral dualphoton absorptiometry (DPA).J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5:525–531.
Larnach TA, Boyd SJ, Smart RC, Butler SP, Rohl PG, Diamond TH. Reproducibility of lateral spine scans using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.Calcif Tissue Int 1992; 51:255–258.
Raymakers JA, Hoeskstra O, van Putten J. Osteoporotic fracture prevalence and bone mineral mass measured with CT and DPA.Skeletal Radiol 1986; 15:191–197.
Duboeuf F, Pommet R, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections.Osteoporosis Int 1994; 4:110–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Del Rio, L., Pons, F., Huguet, M. et al. Anteroposterior versus lateral bone mineral density of spine assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Eur J Nucl Med 22, 407–412 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00839054
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00839054